Trump eliminates Obama-era climate policies

[DennisPTate]

I believe that it was an extremely good thing that President Donald J. Trump has eliminated the "Obama- Era Climate Policies."

I personally believe that the Obama-Era Climate Policies were intellectually dishonest and basically set up the theme for the Bill Gates lecture "Innovating to zero" that was one of the worst ideas that I have ever heard elaborated on in a major political lecture by a famous and influential person during my sixty six years.

I have reason to believe that Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" was intellectually dishonest. Mr. Al Gore left us with the impression that a Carbon Tax could be useful in preventing a potentially catastrophic rise in ocean levels but I believe that powerful evidence exists that Mr. Al Gore was incorrect in leaving us with that impression.

Trump eliminates Obama-era climate policies​

559,831 views Streamed live on Feb 12, 2026 #foxnews #news #us

President Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin are expected to announce plans to repeal climate change policy and environmental regulations. #foxnews #news #us #foxSubscribe to Fox News: https://bit.ly/2vBUvASWatch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.comWatch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/Download the Fox News app: https://foxnews.onelink.me/xLDS/cd5yhg3oBecome a Fox News Patriot member! / @foxnews FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Here is a question related to the world's most extreme tidal waters?

"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters where I live.

So... could high tide levels near TRuro, N. S. to Moncton, N. B. be up by a meter or more if average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters?" [Dennis Tate, March 7, 2021]

Thread 'The Geography of the Bay of Fundy and a proverbial Climate Change "Canary in the coal mine?"'

Jan 17, 2026

Am I wrong to believe that rising ocean levels will happen first and foremost along the Bay of Fundy between the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and the USA State of Maine?


"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 13
• Forum: Science and Technology

Is it true that the ADDITION of H2O to Antarctica has kept ocean levels relatively stable not only for the past decades but actually for many centuries?

"At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie!" (Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory, Gershom Gale, Expanded Discussion on the HAB Theory.)

I feel that the entire article by Mr. Gershom Gale is relevant to the truth on this question?

Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory
Gershom Gale gershon1
@netvision.net.il


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geophysical science offers rather thin explanations for the periods of history during which great glaciers advanced and retreated from the polar regions, leaving a great deal of physical evidence.

The more one delves into the actual evidence, the more skeptical one becomes of the existing theories. The truth, according to the HAB Theory, is that periodically - at intervals ranging from 3,000 to 7000 years but averaging around 5,500 years apart - great global cataclysms have occurred which destroyed virtually all of whatever life forms or civilizations had developed on the Earth to that point.

The cataclysms occur when the Earth is thrown off balance due to a massive, unbalanced accumulation of ice at the polar regions. As these polar ice caps grow, their enormous weight, accumulating unevenly as it does, creates an imbalance, and a wobble begins to develop in the rotation of the Earth on its axis. Year by year, as the ice caps grow, this eccentricity increases until, with devastating suddenness, the polar masses are thrown toward the point of greatest spin, which is the equator. Quite abruptly, the areas which were polar now become equatorial, and vice versa.

The resultant cataclysm is, of course monumental across the entire face of the Earth, except at the two points which become pivotal when the capsizing effect occurs.


An Analogy:

Picture the Earth as a round ball spinning in place on a glass table top. Imagine then, that on the uppermost part of this spinning ball, you drop a tiny glob of molten metal, just slightly off center. The ball immediately begins to wobble...

Add more weight and that wobble becomes more pronounced. Add still more and the eccentricity becomes so great the centrifugal force of the spinning ball grips the weight and turns the entire ball so that the weighted portion is thrown to the imaginary line encircling the ball where the speed is greatest - which is coincident with the imaginary line on Earth known to us as the equator.

That is precisely what happens periodically to the Earth. The buildup of ice at the poles increases until its weight is suddenly thrown some 90 degrees from pole to equator. Yes, the Earth is 26 miles greater in diameter when measured around the equator than when measured around the poles, and one might argue that this bulge provides a stability that would make such a sudden tipping unlikely. But consider: such a variance, considering the size of the planet, is far less than the manufacturing tolerances of an ivory billiard ball.

As the sun evaporates the oceans, the moisture thus released precipitates as rain or snow all over the Earth. But the snows that fall on the polar caps do not melt or flow off at anything like the rate at which they evaporate elsewhere. Snow at the poles piles up and gradually turns into glacial ice. As this process continues, the ice caps increase in size.

At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie! That's enough= ice to form a layer one mile wide and two miles high from New York to Chicago. And this is the buildup of only one year!

These figures were confirmed by Franz Loewe of France and Malcolm Mellors of Australia. There is no mistake.

The present ice mass is considerably over 5.5 million square miles. If the South Pole were over Chicago, that would make a two-mile thick slab of ice extending from Hudson's Bay to Key West, Florida.

Even this wouldn't be a threat if the ice were perfectly centered over the Earth's axis of spin, but it is not. The wobble was discovered by astronomers in 1885. It amounted to only a fraction over an inch. By the mid 1930s, this had increased to just over six feet. In 1970, the radial movement was close to 80 yards. And right now (197, the wobble is approaching a half-mile in radius.

There is no known means of calculating the point at which rollover will occur, though the summer equinox is the most dangerous time each year. It could conceivably happen with another fraction of an inch of added eccentricity. Or the system may remain more or less stable even if the wobble worsened by another mile or more.

Eventually, though, it'll reach the point of no return and the capsizing effect will occur, with essentially no warning. Overcoming the gyroscopic stabilizing effect of the Earth's equatorial bulge, and in obedience to the laws of centrifugal force, the weight of the ice will be thrown toward the equator. The Earth will continue spinning on it's axis as before, but with some dramatic differences: The ice caps will be riding on the equator, and practically all life - Man included - will have been extinguished.

This is not just a one-time occurrence; it has happened over and over again=! There have been thousands of such rollovers, perhaps even millions, during the 4.5-billion year history of the Earth.

How much time have we got before the next capsizing occurs?

The interval between each occurrence in the past has ranged between 3,000 and 7,000 years. The longest period between tilts was just about 7,000 years, give or take 50. The physical evidence indicates that our present epoch has lasted approximately 7,500 years; we've been living on borrowed time for quite a while."

[Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory
Gershom Gale gershon1
@netvision.net.il]

 

[JGalt]

I believe that it was an extremely good thing that President Donald J. Trump has eliminated the "Obama- Era Climate Policies."

I personally believe that the Obama-Era Climate Policies were intellectually dishonest and basically set up the theme for the Bill Gates lecture "Innovating to zero" that was one of the worst ideas that I have ever heard elaborated on in a major political lecture by a famous and influential person during my sixty six years.

I have reason to believe that Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" was intellectually dishonest. Mr. Al Gore left us with the impression that a Carbon Tax could be useful in preventing a potentially catastrophic rise in ocean levels but I believe that powerful evidence exists that Mr. Al Gore was incorrect in leaving us with that impression.

Trump eliminates Obama-era climate policies​

Here is a question related to the world's most extreme tidal waters?

"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters where I live.

So... could high tide levels near TRuro, N. S. to Moncton, N. B. be up by a meter or more if average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters?" [Dennis Tate, March 7, 2021]

Thread 'The Geography of the Bay of Fundy and a proverbial Climate Change "Canary in the coal mine?"'

Jan 17, 2026

Am I wrong to believe that rising ocean levels will happen first and foremost along the Bay of Fundy between the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and the USA State of Maine?


"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 13
• Forum: Science and Technology

Is it true that the ADDITION of H2O to Antarctica has kept ocean levels relatively stable not only for the past decades but actually for many centuries?





I feel that the entire article by Mr. Gershom Gale is relevant to the truth on this question?

Great! It's time we put an end to this Obama-era "climate change" nonsense.

 

[DennisPTate]

Great! It's time we put an end to this Obama-era "climate change" nonsense.

I totally agree with you JGalt!

And I personally think that a better answer may fit perfectly with President Donald J. Trump's obvious desire to convince ten million Israelis and their one billion mostly Islamic neighbours to cooperate economically on what I believe is a much more down to earth and practical answer to how best to stabilize the climate?

"Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur."

Book 005, Number 2208:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (way peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour will not come before wealth becomes abundant and overflowing, so much so that a man takes Zakat out of his property and cannot find anyone to accept it from him and till the land of Arabia becomes meadows and rivers."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 25: The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab)

Assisting nine point four million Israelis and a billion of their mostly Islamic neighbours to divert investment away from warfare and instead into large scale desalination of ocean water for
agriculture, reforestation projects and to make life better for everybody who lives in the Middle East will lead to
the fulfillment of Isaiah chapter thirty five. This fits with the Jewish concept of Tikkun Olam.

... "The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose.
It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice even with joyand singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it, the
excellency of Carmel and Sharon, they shall see the glory of the LORD, and the excellency of our God.

....
Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongueof the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out,
and streams in the desert.
And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water: in the habitation of dragons,where
each lay, shall be grass with reeds and rushes." (Isaiah 35 : 1, 2, 6, 7 ).

A New Mexico biologist and coach wrote up an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate that fits well with these ancient Islamic and Jewish predictions for the last decades and centuries of human history before our Creator gives us a utopian world where the Holy Spirit is poured out on all flesh.

New Mexico biologist and coach Carl Cantrell.....

[Carl Cantrell]
"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breath, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere, carried away by running surface water such as rain fall, is carried away to other areas by our winds, and diffuses down into the soil towards the earth's crust. All of this warms our planet increasing its average temperature.

Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes. This is very critical because warmer and dryer winds dry out other land areas faster decreasing the vegetation on those land areas. Less humidity in the air also reflects less sun light back out into space so that more sun light strikes the earth and more heat is generated.

The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the Sahara Desert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave.

So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive.

Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds

This will do a number of things. First, it will increase the moisture in the desert soil so that it will develop water tables and water will begin to run in the streams. This water will increase the amount of vegetation in the area and decrease the amount of heat being generated by sun light cooling the watered area and all areas down wind of the watered area. As more available water evaporates, it will cool the air and reflect more sun light back out into space cooling the area even more. Cooler and more humid air will have less of a heating effect on areas down wind and will reflect more sun light back into space in those areas cooling areas we won't be watering yet. Cooler and more humid air will also have less of a warming effect on our seas and oceans.

Rain water running off of cooler soil will decrease the heating effect on our oceans and our planet crusts which will decrease catastrophic storm activities for other areas and seismic activity for the entire planet. Also, returning more ocean water to the surface and aquifers of our continents will lower the sea levels providing more usable land for us to farm and build on.

With cooler desert areas and increasing vegetation, less water will evaporate from our deserts increasing the amount of surface water even more and increasing the amount of vegetation and animal life by huge amounts because deserts currently take up more than 20% of our land surface. Populations will be able to spread out and there will be less competition for existing land areas.

This strategy has to be done in steps with the first step being to begin slowing the rate at which our global warming is increasing. We need to focus on that until we have brought it to a point to where the temperature is not increasing any more and is reasonably stable. While we are doing this, we need to come to a global consensus of just how cool we want to cool our planet down to. If we cool it down too much, we will begin to have devastatingly harsh winters in large populated areas and even cause an ice age to set in.

Then we begin cooling the planet down to a point which will be most beneficial for all countries or the planet as a whole. We need to gradually bring the temperature down because there may be a lag effect in which the planet will continue cooling after we stop increasing our efforts to cool it off more. We may even want to stop cooling the planet once or twice before we reach our targeted temperatures to see if there is a lag effect


We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time. (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell).

 

[ColonelAngus]

The Green movement sure was about Green.

MONEY

That is all.

It is a grift.

Only a ******* dipshit would watch the globalist elitists buy oceanfront property for many millions of dollars while simultaneously claiming the seas are rising and NYC will be underwater.

IT IS A LIE.

 

[DennisPTate]

The Green movement sure was about Green.

MONEY

That is all.

It is a grift.

Only a ******* dipshit would watch the globalist elitists buy oceanfront property for many millions of dollars while simultaneously claiming the seas are rising and NYC will be underwater.

IT IS A LIE.

Basically I think that you are correct ColonelAngus but there is more to this topic. In the documentary "Why Big Oil Conquered The World" you will find out that one of Mr. Al Gore's professors was once part of a group of influential people dedicated to linking the fiat currencies of the world's biggest economies to the price and supply of oil.

Strangely enough, a Carbon Tax accomplishes exactly that but it APPEARS ON THE SURFACE to go against the goals of Big Oil.

Now that is what can be thought of as Brilliant Marketing Strategy!

Why Big Oil Conquered the World - Top Documentary Films

Environmental advocates have long protested the role that oil companies play in exacerbating the climate change crisis. Their voices have rattled some of the

topdocumentaryfilms.com

Why Big Oil Conquered the World

 

[EMH]

I have reason to believe that Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" was intellectually dishonest

So did the British Court in 2007...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

 

[EMH]

Is it true that the ADDITION of H2O to Antarctica has kept ocean levels relatively stable not only for the past decades but actually for many centuries?

What is an ice core?

"Ice cores are cylinder-shaped samples drilled from deep within glaciers and ice sheets—primarily in Antarctica and Greenland—that serve as vital archives of Earth's past climate. By analyzing trapped air bubbles, isotopes, and dust, scientists reconstruct atmospheric conditions and temperatures dating back over 800,000 years (actually 2.9 million years is the deepest one from AA)


What does the Antarctic ice core prove?

It proves Antarctica has added a new layer of ice every year for way way more than 3 million years, since the ice core doesn't get close to the bottom. That 100% refutes the concept of an "interglacial" which is and always was CO2 FRAUD bs. It proves Antarctic ice continues to grow. It disproves that Antarctica is "melting."


So, yeah, your quote should be

"ice cores from Antarctica prove Antarctic ice, 90% of Earth's ice, has grown every year for more than the past 3 million years and will continue to do so until AA moves off South Pole"

 

[DennisPTate]

So did the British Court in 2007...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Wow!!!!!

Although I have been making an effort to keep somewhat up to date on all of this I did not know about this decision in a British Court. Wow!!!

 

[EMH]

But let's be serious. To end CO2 FRAUD, you must prosecute it. Trump and Zeldin have done their jobs. Pam Bondi has not. If the Dems win in 2028, all CO2 FRAUD stuff will go right back on and continue.


This is a GDF embarrassment. This case has been out there for 15 years. Pam Bondi is either running an incompetent DOJ or she herself is a corrupt treasonous card carrying member of Alliance for Treason.


WTF??

Google Search

 

[EMH]

Wow!!!!!

Although I have been making an effort to keep somewhat up to date on all of this I did not know about this decision in a British Court. Wow!!!

and the media ignored it, CO2 FRAUD never appealed, and the lie-a-thon continued...

 

[DennisPTate]

What is an ice core?

"Ice cores are cylinder-shaped samples drilled from deep within glaciers and ice sheets—primarily in Antarctica and Greenland—that serve as vital archives of Earth's past climate. By analyzing trapped air bubbles, isotopes, and dust, scientists reconstruct atmospheric conditions and temperatures dating back over 800,000 years (actually 2.9 million years is the deepest one from AA)


What does the Antarctic ice core prove?

It proves Antarctica has added a new layer of ice every year for way way more than 3 million years, since the ice core doesn't get close to the bottom. That 100% refutes the concept of an "interglacial" which is and always was CO2 FRAUD bs. It proves Antarctic ice continues to grow. It disproves that Antarctica is "melting."


So, yeah, your quote should be

"ice cores from Antarctica prove Antarctic ice, 90% of Earth's ice, has grown every year for more than the past 3 million years and will continue to do so until AA moves off South Pole"

Wow!!!!

EMH, have you personally heard about potential health benefits from Antarctic ice that is several thousand years old but is melted and fish is grown in that water. I have heard that fish grown in several thousand year old melted ice from Antarctica grow about four hundred percent faster than fish grown in modern H2O?

The idea is that the type of solar radiation that was absorbed by that water several millennia ago, was different and had health benefits. [What I am thinking about is tankers going to the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and taking ice to nations where the people would be interested in drinking this potentially exceptionally beneficial, several thousand year old ice?

Apparently several thousand year old ice from Greenland would also have health benefits but due to what has been happening in the Arctic I think that it would be better if ancient ice from Antarctica were used for the improvement of human health vs the ice from Greenland, [that I assume is providing a useful counterbalance to the massive growth of ice in Antarctica?

Did I understand you correctly in some of your other messages, that the North Pole has been moving toward Siberia for some time?

Is this the primary reason for the obvious warming in Alaska and in Canada's Arctic region?

 

[EMH]

Wow!!!!

EMH, have you personally heard about potential health benefits from Antarctic ice that is several thousand years old but is melted and fish is grown in that water. I have heard that fish grown in several thousand year old melted ice from Antarctica grow about four hundred percent faster than fish grown in modern H2O?

The idea is that the type of solar radiation that was absorbed by that water several millennia ago, was different and had health benefits. [What I am thinking about is tankers going to the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and taking ice to nations where the people would be interested in drinking this potentially exceptionally beneficial, several thousand year old ice?

Apparently several thousand year old ice from Greenland would also have health benefits but due to what has been happening in the Arctic I think that it would be better if ancient ice from Antarctica were used for the improvement of human health vs the ice from Greenland, [that I assume is providing a useful counterbalance to the massive growth of ice in Antarctica?

Did I understand you correctly in some of your other messages, that the North Pole has been moving toward Siberia for some time?

Is this the primary reason for the obvious warming in Alaska and in Canada's Arctic region?

Haven't heard that claim. But it kinda makes sense, in that ice a thousand years old has none of the modern human pollutants in it.

Of course, when an Antarctic iceberg calves, the ice on the bottom of it is millions of years old...

 

[DennisPTate]

But let's be serious. To end CO2 FRAUD, you must prosecute it. Trump and Zeldin have done their jobs. Pam Bondi has not. If the Dems win in 2028, all CO2 FRAUD stuff will go right back on and continue.


This is a GDF embarrassment. This case has been out there for 15 years. Pam Bondi is either running an incompetent DOJ or she herself is a corrupt treasonous card carrying member of Alliance for Treason.


WTF??

Google Search

Or could it be that the recent releases of video footage from the Epstein Island files has been perfectly timed?

Could it be that the legal troubles that Prince Andrew is in is the perfect opening gambit to lead to the taking down of a high percentage of the worst of the worst of the worst who were most involved in what happened on Epstein Island? [And rumour has it that there were vastly worse Islands than Epstein Island]?

In my opinion if the worst of the worst of the predators from the Epstein Island Files are prosecuted you will also be dealing with the leaders behind the modern concept of "Neo-Malthusian Economic Philosophy" that a Carbon Tax set the stage for? Bill Gates in his lecture, "Innovating to zero", was reading a script that was likely passed to him by leaders of Neo-Malthusian Economic Philosophy. They really do believe in depopulation.

Neo-Malthusianism is a modern, 19th-20th century extension of Thomas Malthus’s population theories, advocating for artificial contraception, family planning, and education to curb rapid population growth. Unlike original Malthusianism, which focused on food shortages, this approach highlights the environmental, economic, and social dangers of overpopulation, including ecological collapse and resource exhaustion.

Key Aspects of Neo-Malthusianism

• Core Philosophy: Proponents argue that population growth, if unchecked, will outstrip natural resources (such as oil, water, and minerals) and lead to environmental degradation.
• Preventive Measures:
  Unlike Malthus, who suggested "moral restraint," Neo-Malthusians advocate for proactive measures, including access to contraception, education, and, in some cases, government-led population control initiatives
  .
• • Environmental Impact: The ideology is closely linked with the concept that high population density combined with high consumption patterns causes significant ecological damage.
  • Origin: The term was coined in 1877 by Dr. Samuel Van Horton to describe the shift towards advocating for artificial means of limiting population.
  • Influence: It was a significant force behind the Zero Population Growth movement in the 1960s.

Criticisms and Contrast

• Discredited Theory: Critics argue that agricultural advancements and technological innovation have consistently outpaced population growth, disproving the inevitability of a Malthusian catastrophe.
• Anti-Poor/Human Rights Concerns: Many critics find the approach to be pessimistic or Malthusian policies (such as forced sterilization) to be unethical.
• Alternative Views: Some, like economist Julian Simon, argue that humans are "ultimate resources" who create solutions rather than just consume resources.

 

[Crepitus]

I believe that it was an extremely good thing that President Donald J. Trump has eliminated the "Obama- Era Climate Policies."

I personally believe that the Obama-Era Climate Policies were intellectually dishonest and basically set up the theme for the Bill Gates lecture "Innovating to zero" that was one of the worst ideas that I have ever heard elaborated on in a major political lecture by a famous and influential person during my sixty six years.

I have reason to believe that Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" was intellectually dishonest. Mr. Al Gore left us with the impression that a Carbon Tax could be useful in preventing a potentially catastrophic rise in ocean levels but I believe that powerful evidence exists that Mr. Al Gore was incorrect in leaving us with that impression.

Trump eliminates Obama-era climate policies​

Here is a question related to the world's most extreme tidal waters?

"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters where I live.

So... could high tide levels near TRuro, N. S. to Moncton, N. B. be up by a meter or more if average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters?" [Dennis Tate, March 7, 2021]

Thread 'The Geography of the Bay of Fundy and a proverbial Climate Change "Canary in the coal mine?"'

Jan 17, 2026

Am I wrong to believe that rising ocean levels will happen first and foremost along the Bay of Fundy between the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and the USA State of Maine?


"Physics question related to the geography of the Bay of Fundy?"

"If average ocean levels were to rise by ten centimeters.... .would
the multiplier effect of the geography of the Bay of Fundy continue?

The fact that the Bay of Fundy funnels tidal waters plus......
it is over 170 miles long, (274 kms), it produces high tide level that are tenX to fifteenX over the difference in tidal waters...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 13
• Forum: Science and Technology

Is it true that the ADDITION of H2O to Antarctica has kept ocean levels relatively stable not only for the past decades but actually for many centuries?





I feel that the entire article by Mr. Gershom Gale is relevant to the truth on this question?

It's an incredibly stupid idea.

He is trading short term gains for long tern tragedies.

Dooming tens of thousands of people to early deaths.

Destroying wildlife habitats and biodiversity.

And eventually costing every American more instead of less.

But hey, it does give the billionaires more pocket money so it's all good, right?

 

[DennisPTate]

It's an incredibly stupid idea.

He is trading short term gains for long tern tragedies.

Dooming tens of thousands of people to early deaths.

Destroying wildlife habitats and biodiversity.

And eventually costing every American more instead of less.

But hey, it does give the billionaires more pocket money so it's all good, right?

So then do you mean by this that I personally am an idiot or terribly misguided to suggest deliberately turning deserts green as a more effective way to stabilize the climate than a Carbon Tax?

Thread 'My 2007 submission for $25 million "Virgin Earth Challenge?"'

Nov 10, 2025

I have been told that my 2007 submission for the twenty five million dollar "Virgin Earth Challenge" was quite funny.

I have to plead guilty that that was one of my major objectives. I felt a duty at that time to get people to think outside of the little green, or red, or orange or blue political box that BigMedia seemed to be cramming all of us Canadians down into?

I believe that fairly good humour can be fairly serious all at the same time. That was indeed my objective. Do you think that this writing is both funny as well as basically serious or accurate?

"Today, Sir Richard...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 10
• Forum: Humor

• 

About​

The Sorek desalination plant is one of a kind and the largest seawater desalination plant operating with 16’’ elements in a unique vertical arrangement.

It provides potable water for millions of people, comprising 20% of the municipal water demand in Israel, thus greatly contributing to the country’s water system resilience (while minimizing the environmental impact).

In 2018 IDE sold Sorek 1 desalination plant to Dan Capital. The sale was required under a deal agreed by IDE with antitrust (competition) authorities allowing IDE to bid on a BOT tender for a second SWRO desalination plant at Soreq.

• Capacity: 640,000 m³/day
• Technology: Reverse Osmosis (RO)
• Water Source: Seawater
• Contract type: BOT For 25 years
• Usage: Potable Water
• Location: Rishon Le Zion, Israel
• Customer: Israel Water Authority
• Commissioning date: 2013

Sorek I Desalination Plant (Israel) | IDE Tech

The Sorek desalination plant is one of the world's largest SWRO facilities. It sets global standards in seawater reverse osmosis.

ide-tech.com

 

[EMH]

Or could it be that the recent releases of video footage from the Epstein Island files has been perfectly timed?

Could it be that the legal troubles that Prince Andrew is in is the perfect opening gambit to lead to the taking down of a high percentage of the worst of the worst of the worst who were most involved in what happened on Epstein Island? [And rumour has it that there were vastly worse Islands than Epstein Island]?

In my opinion if the worst of the worst of the predators from the Epstein Island Files are prosecuted you will also be dealing with the leaders behind the modern concept of "Neo-Malthusian Economic Philosophy" that a Carbon Tax set the stage for? Bill Gates in his lecture, "Innovating to zero", was reading a script that was likely passed to him by leaders of Neo-Malthusian Economic Philosophy. They really do believe in depopulation.

When Trump picked Pam Bondi, many of us were hopeful.

Then the clash with Dan and Kash, Pam forced both to get on TV and lie about Epstein, Dan called for Pam to be fired, and about 6 months later it appears Dan was 100% spot on.

Pam Bondi showed her true colors with Epstein, a knee jerk cover it up instinct that is present in every GOP state AG in America.... if the pals of Jeff Epstein can be prosecuted, THEY WON'T PROSECUTE... and that's not all. There is reason to believe Pam Bondi thinks the W and homO Administrations should be ABOVE THE LAW. That's what Fox News has pushed for a quarter century.

While there are undoubtedly fake Trump files in Epstein files, the redactions are way way beyond that. There is huge evidence in Epstein files of something


W/Mukasey
homO/Holder and Lynch
Sessions
Barr
Garland

and now Bondi


all want covered up...

Thread 'Epstein and 911, why so many "redactions..."'

Feb 4, 2026

Prince Andrew's Ex Lady Victoria Hervey Believes Jeffrey Epstein Had A Role In 9/11

Prince Andrew's ex-lover Lady Victoria Hervey also claimed on Instagram that 9/11 was not possible, and that the Russians are fighting Ukrainian Nazis.

radaronline.com

"Prince Andrew’s ex-lover Lady Victoria Hervey recently took to social media to reveal a whole slew of different conspiracy theories, including her claim that the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein knew about 9/11 before it happened, and even suggests that the attacks on 9/11 were an inside job."



obvious all along, since Epstein made 90% of his $2 bil net worth on 911 investing in gold, oil, the long bond, and defense stocks, the ONLY time Epstein...

• EMH
• Replies: 63
• Forum: Conspiracy Theories

• 
• 

 

[DennisPTate]

and the media ignored it, CO2 FRAUD never appealed, and the lie-a-thon continued...

Here in Canada the CBC is arguably even more intellectually dishonest than CNN is in regards to what is happening in the USA.

Canada's Liberal Party has used the CBC as something like the official State Ran Propaganda Machine for decades.

Canada's Pierre Poilievre has courageous stated that the CBC should be privatized. Poilievre is of course correct but it is not easy to go up against BigMedia.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lefties,

Explain how you are going to stop the Yellowstone Super Volcano from exploding and covering the USA in ash and lava.

That will be serious climate change. What are you going to do about it?

 

[Darkwind]

Lefties,

Explain how you are going to stop the Yellowstone Super Volcano from exploding and covering the USA in ash and lava.

That will be serious climate change. What are you going to do about it?

They are going to go take selfies with very dangerous brown bears or even a bull moose. They are that stupid.

 

[DennisPTate]

When Trump picked Pam Bondi, many of us were hopeful.

Then the clash with Dan and Kash, Pam forced both to get on TV and lie about Epstein, Dan called for Pam to be fired, and about 6 months later it appears Dan was 100% spot on.

Pam Bondi showed her true colors with Epstein, a knee jerk cover it up instinct that is present in every GOP state AG in America.... if the pals of Jeff Epstein can be prosecuted, THEY WON'T PROSECUTE... and that's not all. There is reason to believe Pam Bondi thinks the W and homO Administrations should be ABOVE THE LAW. That's what Fox News has pushed for a quarter century.

While there are undoubtedly fake Trump files in Epstein files, the redactions are way way beyond that. There is huge evidence in Epstein files of something


W/Mukasey
homO/Holder and Lynch
Sessions
Barr
Garland

and now Bondi


all want covered up...

Thread 'Epstein and 911, why so many "redactions..."'

Feb 4, 2026

Prince Andrew's Ex Lady Victoria Hervey Believes Jeffrey Epstein Had A Role In 9/11

Prince Andrew's ex-lover Lady Victoria Hervey also claimed on Instagram that 9/11 was not possible, and that the Russians are fighting Ukrainian Nazis.

radaronline.com

"Prince Andrew’s ex-lover Lady Victoria Hervey recently took to social media to reveal a whole slew of different conspiracy theories, including her claim that the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein knew about 9/11 before it happened, and even suggests that the attacks on 9/11 were an inside job."



obvious all along, since Epstein made 90% of his $2 bil net worth on 911 investing in gold, oil, the long bond, and defense stocks, the ONLY time Epstein...

• EMH
• Replies: 63
• Forum: Conspiracy Theories

• 
• 

But just a couple of days ago my wife told me about some serious video footage from the Epstein Files that is certain to increase the political will within a majority of Americans that even the biggest names on the Epstein Island List will be dealt with?

It is brilliant that the USA Dems are calling for this and they may soon get exactly what they have been calling for. The arrests of big names from Washington and Hollywood, [and hopefully a few from Ottawa as well]?