Trump: Economic Traitor. Trump Supporters. Economic Traitors!

[Highlight]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.



@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-



PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

 

[Harry Dresden]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

View attachment 1115746

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.


@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-


PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

who lowered it?....

 

[Darkwind]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

View attachment 1115746

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.


@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-


PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

Two things.

Taxes were not cut. They were just not allowed to return to Communist levels.

The other thing is, do you work at being this stupid? Or is it natural?

 

[Oddball]

Nobody is cutting dick....The rates are remaining the same.

 

[80zephyr]

Nobody paid that rate.

3.​

• 1950s: The top 1% paid roughly 30-35% of all federal income taxes.
• Today: The top 1% pays about 40% of all federal income taxes in the U.S. (data as of 2020).

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

View attachment 1115746

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.


@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-


PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

How much money was raised by taxing millionaires at 90%?

 

[Man With A Plan]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

View attachment 1115746

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.


@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-


PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

John F. Kennedy cut taxes. He's NOT a Republican! He's a Democratic ICON!

 

[Highlight]

who lowered it?....

Probably both democrats and republicans. But that isn't the point. The point is that Trump wanting to cut taxes for the wealthy (even more) has been proven to be the wrong way to go.

 

[BackAgain]

Halfbright overstates the intelligence of the OP.

 

[Highlight]

Nobody paid that rate.

3.​

• 1950s: The top 1% paid roughly 30-35% of all federal income taxes.
• Today: The top 1% pays about 40% of all federal income taxes in the U.S. (data as of 2020).

Well, I posted a link that says otherwise. A link about FACTS.

 

[Crepitus]

John F. Kennedy cut taxes. He's NOT a Republican! He's a Democratic ICON!

His biggest claim to fame is being shot to death. He really didn't have time to accomplish much, other than nearly botching the Cuban missile crisis

 

[Highlight]

How much money was raised by taxing millionaires at 90%?

Maybe you should ask Eisenhower. But at any rate, a lot more money was raised than is saved by taking away food stamps from the poor. For example, Eisenhower had enough money to build the U.S. highway system.

 

[Oddball]

Well, I posted a link that says otherwise. A link about FACTS.

Acquaint yourself with the concept of "marginal rates", sub-moron.

How could it be that the tax code of the 1950s had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent, but resulted in an effective tax rate of only 42 percent on the wealthiest taxpayers? In fact, the situation is even stranger. The 42.0 percent tax rate on the top 1 percent takes into account all taxes levied by federal, state, and local governments, including: income, payroll, corporate, excise, property, and estate taxes. When we look at income taxes specifically, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid an average effective rate of only 16.9 percent in income taxes during the 1950s.

Taxes on the Rich Were Not That Much Higher in the 1950s

Despite high marginal income tax rates, the top 1% of taxpayers in the 1950s only paid about 42% of their income in taxes. See more about taxes on the rich.

taxfoundation.org

 

[Zincwarrior]

It's that simple. Because Trump is all about cutting taxes for the wealthy. And the wealthier they are, the more he wants to cut their taxes. I have a republican meme on that point. Here it is.

View attachment 1115746

Though if you don't like memes, try this website on for size.


@politifact
politifact.com › factchecks › 2015 › nov › 15 › bernie-sanders › income-tax-rates-were-90-percent-under-eisenhower-


PolitiFact | Income tax rates were 90 percent under Eisenhower, Sanders says

Trump is not a Republican. He is a MAGA WHO Sucks Russian dick.

 

[Highlight]

John F. Kennedy cut taxes. He's NOT a Republican! He's a Democratic ICON!

Yeah, from what my AI search said, he wanted it cut from 91% to 65%. But I'm not saying that they all aren't corrupt. It's just that republicans are far more corrupt in that regard. Though Kennedy was assassinated. After Johnson took office, that tax cut was lowered to 70%.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Maybe you should ask Eisenhower. But at any rate, a lot more money was raised than is saved by taking away food stamps from the poor. For example, Eisenhower had enough money to build the U.S. highway system.

Ike isn't available.
And you can't answer, moron.

 

[Highlight]

His biggest claim to fame is being shot to death. He really didn't have time to accomplish much, other than nearly botching the Cuban missile crisis

Kennedy saved the world in that regard. From what I have read, Kennedy was surrounded by war hawks who wanted to invade Cuba. What the U.S. didn't know at the time was that those nuclear missiles in Cuba had Cubans ready to push the buttons to launch. Not Russians. Which if we invaded Cuba is just what would have happened. You know where that would have led.

 

[Highlight]

Acquaint yourself with the concept of "marginal rates", sub-moron.

How could it be that the tax code of the 1950s had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent, but resulted in an effective tax rate of only 42 percent on the wealthiest taxpayers? In fact, the situation is even stranger. The 42.0 percent tax rate on the top 1 percent takes into account all taxes levied by federal, state, and local governments, including: income, payroll, corporate, excise, property, and estate taxes. When we look at income taxes specifically, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid an average effective rate of only 16.9 percent in income taxes during the 1950s.

Taxes on the Rich Were Not That Much Higher in the 1950s

Despite high marginal income tax rates, the top 1% of taxpayers in the 1950s only paid about 42% of their income in taxes. See more about taxes on the rich.

taxfoundation.org

Yeah, I saw that one already, moron. But what kind of tax break does Trump want to give the wealthy. (Apart from what he already gave them) A tax cut, or a "marginal" tax cut.

 

[Highlight]

Ike isn't available.
And you can't answer, moron.

Can't answer? Ever drive down one of the many interstate highways?

 

[BackAgain]

Acquaint yourself with the concept of "marginal rates", sub-moron.

How could it be that the tax code of the 1950s had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent, but resulted in an effective tax rate of only 42 percent on the wealthiest taxpayers? In fact, the situation is even stranger. The 42.0 percent tax rate on the top 1 percent takes into account all taxes levied by federal, state, and local governments, including: income, payroll, corporate, excise, property, and estate taxes. When we look at income taxes specifically, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid an average effective rate of only 16.9 percent in income taxes during the 1950s.

Taxes on the Rich Were Not That Much Higher in the 1950s

Despite high marginal income tax rates, the top 1% of taxpayers in the 1950s only paid about 42% of their income in taxes. See more about taxes on the rich.

taxfoundation.org

You’re embarrassing the schmuck. Facts do that to the sub morons.

Well played.