Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

[BertramN]

.



Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

According to legal analysts, trump's lawsuit over the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago property could backfire.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said in a post on X that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ. As a civil case, it would involve the discovery process and trump would be deposed under oath. And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

So, we know trump will drop the lawsuit when discovery begins, after all, this is “‘a predictable Trump litigation strategy.’” It’s more likely the lawsuit will be dismissed because there's no evidence to prove trump's claims that the raid was part of a “‘political prosecution’”.

Suing the DOJ is just more trump bullsh!t.

MSN

.

 

[Lastamender]

.



Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

According to legal analysts, trump's lawsuit over the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago property could backfire.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said in a post on X that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ. As a civil case, it would involve the discovery process and trump would be deposed under oath. And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

So, we know trump will drop the lawsuit when discovery begins, after all, this is “‘a predictable Trump litigation strategy.’” It’s more likely the lawsuit will be dismissed because there's no evidence to prove trump's claims that the raid was part of a “‘political prosecution’”.

Suing the DOJ is just more trump bullsh!t.

MSN

.

Backfire like the lawfare waged against Trump for 8 years? Like that?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

.



Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

According to legal analysts, trump's lawsuit over the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago property could backfire.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said in a post on X that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ. As a civil case, it would involve the discovery process and trump would be deposed under oath. And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

So, we know trump will drop the lawsuit when discovery begins, after all, this is “‘a predictable Trump litigation strategy.’” It’s more likely the lawsuit will be dismissed because there's no evidence to prove trump's claims that the raid was part of a “‘political prosecution’”.

Suing the DOJ is just more trump bullsh!t.

MSN

.

that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ.

Of course she is not at the DOJ, so being an armchair quarterback, just isnt going to fly. The FIB tampered with evidence, that right there is against the law.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

 

[Marener]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

Delusional.

 

[westwall]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

Smith SHOULD be in prison. He's a criminal.

 

[JLW]

The lawsuit was idiotic.

The trouble with Trump is that he thinks with his head.

The problem is it’s not the one on top of his neck.

 

[rampart]

.



Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

According to legal analysts, trump's lawsuit over the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago property could backfire.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said in a post on X that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ. As a civil case, it would involve the discovery process and trump would be deposed under oath. And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

So, we know trump will drop the lawsuit when discovery begins, after all, this is “‘a predictable Trump litigation strategy.’” It’s more likely the lawsuit will be dismissed because there's no evidence to prove trump's claims that the raid was part of a “‘political prosecution’”.

Suing the DOJ is just more trump bullsh!t.

MSN

.

according to marc elias, the dems election litigator, they have so many lawyers and unlimited funding. the good guys are preparing to be buried in frivolous lawsuits before unfriendly courts.

no link but its "democracy docket dot com" or something.

as for trump under oath? there are a few examples. it does not seem to slow him down.

 

[toobfreak]

And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

You tards sure must be running scared to need to blow smoke up your asses so much!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course she is not at the DOJ, so being an armchair quarterback, just isnt going to fly. The FIB tampered with evidence, that right there is against the law.

But this has no bearing on the case against Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump would have to sit for a deposition that would include questions about his own criminal activity.

Then, tell the truth. Or plead the 5th

Neither is good for him. Trump's.lawyers know this. Trump knows this.

This is all just theater for the rubes.

 

[two_iron]

Gosh, yeah, what's he gonna do with another $100 Million? Right?

Do you pathetic cocksuckers ever question the stupid shit your thought leaders make you post?

Wow.... just ******* wow.

 

[skye]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

Hope and pray he goes to jail!

He is corrupt to the bone a POS

 

[jc456]

.



Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

According to legal analysts, trump's lawsuit over the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago property could backfire.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said in a post on X that she would “‘welcome’” the lawsuit if she were at the DOJ. As a civil case, it would involve the discovery process and trump would be deposed under oath. And trump avoids any activity that requires telling the truth.

So, we know trump will drop the lawsuit when discovery begins, after all, this is “‘a predictable Trump litigation strategy.’” It’s more likely the lawsuit will be dismissed because there's no evidence to prove trump's claims that the raid was part of a “‘political prosecution’”.

Suing the DOJ is just more trump bullsh!t.

MSN

.

Fbi is above the law? Since when?

 

[jknowgood]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

He deserves to.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump would have to sit for a deposition that would include questions about his own criminal activity.

Then, tell the truth. Or plead the 5th

Neither is good for him. Trump's.lawyers know this. Trump knows this.

This is all just theater for the rubes.

The theater here is Kamala's campaign and the fake polls.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Gosh, yeah, what's he gonna do with another $100 Million? Right?

Fix the damage at Mar A Lago.

Are you implying that the fat slob is gasp LYING, and those damages to his property don't exist?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They staged evidence.

Lie.

 

[Edgetho]

They staged evidence.
That is a major crime.
Jack Smith might go to prison.

He should be executed

 

[two_iron]

He should be executed

He's on suicide watch.... (as if anyone would care)....