Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is Mar Lago a deed private deed restricted club or not?Omg, now you're questioning real estate experts.... You're hilarious...
Make sure you're up to date with all of Eggmoron's opinions before you form any new ones about the case. He's the real expert on everything.
Do you have a link the bank knew Trump was being fraudulent yet?
Is Mar Lago a deed private deed restricted club or not?
It's in the report. It's the assessor's value.Sure, when you prove Mara Lago is worth 18 mil.
It's in the report. It's the assessor's value.
Trump said a 26 million valuation was too high...oh but you won't read the report so never mind.
From like 2010.
It's the tax assessors value.
Yes.Do you own any property?
I know. Trump thought he assessed to high.
Yes.
What's the current tax assessment? Why is it assessed at that value? How does the tax assessment differ from market value?
So you don't believe the area's professional real estate brokers on their assessment of the value of Mara Lago?
And based on your comments here, I don't believe you do.
Bullshit....Trump said a 26 million valuation was too high...oh but you won't read the report so never mind.
Look it up. I'm don't being your researcher.
Not if he is basing it on the incorrect fact that Mar Lago is a private residence.
From the same document.Bullshit.
Q. In light of your expertise in real estate, do you recall ever
thinking that the values were off in your Statements of
Financial Condition?
A. Yeah, on occasion.
Q. What were some of those occasions?
A. Both high and low; both high and low.
Q. Which occasions do you recall?
A. I thought that Mar-a-Lago was very underestimated, but I
didn’t do anything about it. I just left it be. It didn’t matter,
I didn’t care, because the numbers you are talking about here
is, you know, they are very big numbers, very, very big. Far
bigger – the values are far bigger than what is on the
financial statement. I thought Mar-a-Lago was
underestimated.
I'm asking to see if you know, apparently you don't and are arguing out of ignorance.
So you think they'd make a professional opinion without knowing the facts about the property? Of course you would. I'm sure they haven't read that at all, nor about the deed restrictions.
I'm not an expert. It's in the court document.Out of curiosity, what effect do the deed restrictions have, what percentage would they lower the value and why? Since you're the expert on this.
That is obviously regarding the tax assessment, not what Trump valued MAL on his SFC's.From the same document.
It's the same document I thought...the ruling? Unless you got it from an outside source then my bad.That is obviously regarding the tax assessment, not what Trump valued MAL on his SFC's.
It is not from the same document. I was quoting Engoron's ruling.
Please post the doc you are citing.
www.pbs.org
I never asserted thatNo, I equates cases that used 63 (12) despite the assertion that the law had never been used.
What about Trump University and his charity scam?I never asserted that
What I others have said is that the indictments against trump are political
He was never a target of the DA in new york till every other attempt to keep him out of politics failed
Trump had nothing to do with that other than lend his nameWhat about Trump University and his charity scam?
Seriously?Trump had nothing to do with that other than lend his name
www.google.com
Okay,same doc. For some reason the text isn't searchable.It's the same document I thought...the ruling? Unless you got it from an outside source then my bad.
Here is the ruling.
Read the full civil fraud trial ruling imposing penalty of over $350 million against Trump
Judge Arthur Engoron issued his decision after a 2½-month trial that saw the Republican presidential front-runner bristling under oath that he was the victim of a rigged legal system.
Page 41. About half way down.
