Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

[gipper]

That's what they said about Reagan....and Goldwater.

Don't you guys have anything new?

Trump would start a war because he cannot control his mouth.

Since when to mouths start wars?

I'm certain Trump could insult the wrong person bad enough for them to react with aggression.

Please cite recent historical examples of a nation's leader insulting another nation's leader that resulted in war.

Over the weekend the South Koreans were blaring insults at the North Korean's leader. The North seemed willing to risk a war with the South over these insults.

There was no war...so you are wrong.

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

 

[Papageorgio]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

Why would Obama use the term teagbagger for the Tea Party? Why do people use the term Teabagger, a notable sexual term for the Tea Party. It is used as a pejorative for a group of people. It is to demean and minimize them with a sexual term.

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

Why would Obama use the term teagbagger for the Tea Party? Why do people use the term Teabagger, a notable sexual term for the Tea Party. It is used as a pejorative for a group of people. It is to demean and minimize them with a sexual term.

I have never heard that the term has sexual connotations. I don't think the vast majority of people on the planet have heard such a thing, including Obama. It is not a 'notable' sexual term except, perhaps, to a specific lower class of people who have sexual issues.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

Teabagger to me is someone who sucks on a hairy ballsack.

That's worse than Bimbo. Bimbo means a good looking woman with a lack of intelligence. You wouldn't call Rosie O'Donnell a Bimbo because she doesn't have the looks for it.

 

[Papageorgio]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

Why would Obama use the term teagbagger for the Tea Party? Why do people use the term Teabagger, a notable sexual term for the Tea Party. It is used as a pejorative for a group of people. It is to demean and minimize them with a sexual term.

I have never heard that the term has sexual connotations. I don't think the vast majority of people on the planet have heard such a thing, including Obama. It is not a 'notable' sexual term except, perhaps, to a specific lower class of people who have sexual issues.

BS! Why would you call them teabaggers and not the Tea Party?

It was touted by several lefties on this board and knew the meaning as they used it. Also many righties on this board explained it.

It's in the urban dictionary. Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean a damn thing.

I do agree with you though that politicians need to have a filter, including Trump and Obama.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

Why would Obama use the term teagbagger for the Tea Party? Why do people use the term Teabagger, a notable sexual term for the Tea Party. It is used as a pejorative for a group of people. It is to demean and minimize them with a sexual term.

I have never heard that the term has sexual connotations. I don't think the vast majority of people on the planet have heard such a thing, including Obama. It is not a 'notable' sexual term except, perhaps, to a specific lower class of people who have sexual issues.

Anyone so closely attuned to the gay community knows what Teabagging is. Obama knows. He called millions of American ballsucking faggots....and attempted to hide it buy acting like the insult was innocent. That's the primary difference between Trump and Obama. Trump loves America and it's people, and Obama obviously doesn't.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump calls one woman a bimbo.......Obama called millions of us Teabaggers.

And you don't see the difference? How funny.

Actually, Trump wasn't the one calling her a bimbo. The post that said that was a retweet, not his tweet. So basically, he didn't call her that.
However, we all saw Obama call us, essentially, a bunch of ball-sucking faggots.

Call you 'essentially'? Call you 'essentially' a something bad? Did he name call? Did he act like an adolescent and use a bad word?

You really don't understand the difference between using no control name calling and using some diplomacy and indirect commentary do you?

Someone like Trump can never be the US president because he does not know how to behave. He blurts out whatever is on his lips and in his mind without regard to how it will be perceived by the multitudes of people here and around the world.

People in all walks of life use diplomacy to tell people what they think--if your mother-in-law bothers you, you don't (hopefully) call her a fat ugly pig. You may imply you think that, but you use different terminology in order to avoid a really bad reaction. That's what adults do.

Trump does not behave like an adult. He shows no restraint. That characteristic alone would cause him to be a disaster as a president.

As opposed to a ideologue who needs a teleprompter keep from saying what's on his demented mind.

 

[HUGGY]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened. Bush never happened.

 

[Papageorgio]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

 

[HUGGY]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

 

[Papageorgio]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

 

[HUGGY]

Trump calls Megyn Kelly a "bimbo"...again

Well...she can refute that claim by posting her I Q publicly.

Ha Ha Ha First she must figure out what I Q means.

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

It's too complicated to say any one individual is responsible for the disasters that occurred and were manufactured when Bush was president. But one thing we cannot dismiss is that Bush was in charge of a lot of it.

Bush was in charge of rushing to war with scant and false evidence. Being the CIC and throwing your hands up in disbelief and saying it wasn't his fault because so and so turned out to be a liar is too flimsy to be believed by Americans. I'm sorry but THAT just isn't good enough.

The activities that were generated down on "K" street in DC had a lot to do with the financial disaster. Truth be told Bush is too stupid to have been involved with the "derivative" scheme. But his reaction to the 9/11 attack was like a scared little girl. He failed miserably because he has huge character flaws and it showed time and time again as he screwed the pooch over and over dealing with what was in reality a very spectacular and successful terror plot. In truth it was just a crime. There were just a handful of people involved, mostly Saudis, and Bush just went into full retard in his failed attempt to make those still alive pay for their crime. Bush USED it to become the war president he had been talking about for a long time before he even got elected. Cheney on the other hand used the attack to make his then failing company and their executives wealthy. Their hubris was STUNNING.

 

[Papageorgio]

That isn't the point. The point is that someone who aspires to be the president of the US should not be calling anyone such names. He needs to have more class, more dignity, and more diplomacy.

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

It's too complicated to say any one individual is responsible for the disasters that occurred and were manufactured when Bush was president. But one thing we cannot dismiss is that Bush was in charge of a lot of it.

Bush was in charge of rushing to war with scant and false evidence. Being the CIC and throwing your hands up in disbelief and saying it wasn't his fault because so and so turned out to be a liar is too flimsy to be believed by Americans. I'm sorry but THAT just isn't good enough.

The activities that were generated down on "K" street in DC had a lot to do with the financial disaster. Truth be told Bush is too stupid to have been involved with the "derivative" scheme. But his reaction to the 9/11 attack was like a scared little girl. He failed miserably because he has huge character flaws and it showed time and time again as he screwed the pooch over and over dealing with what was in reality a very spectacular and successful terror plot. In truth it was just a crime. There were just a handful of people involved, mostly Saudis, and Bush just went into full retard in his failed attempt to make those still alive pay for their crime. Bush USED it to become the war president he had been talking about for a long time before he even got elected. Cheney on the other hand used the attack to make his then failing company and their executives wealthy. Their hubris was STUNNING.

It's not that complicated, Clinton when he deregulated had a large part in the recession. The credit boom that started in the 80s and increased for decades unfettered. It didn't matter who was President, that recession was going to hit. I can't believe it didn't start in 2001 but somehow it was staved off until 2008.

The rest of your rant is biased BS that I refuse to rehash.

 

[HUGGY]

Trump has never had to answer to anyone in his whole privileged life. I bet none of you RWers are willing to remember that the Donald almost ran his company into total bankruptcy a few years back. He not only is the above mentioned adjectives he is also reckless. We cannot afford another reckless president. But of course Bush never happened.

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

It's too complicated to say any one individual is responsible for the disasters that occurred and were manufactured when Bush was president. But one thing we cannot dismiss is that Bush was in charge of a lot of it.

Bush was in charge of rushing to war with scant and false evidence. Being the CIC and throwing your hands up in disbelief and saying it wasn't his fault because so and so turned out to be a liar is too flimsy to be believed by Americans. I'm sorry but THAT just isn't good enough.

The activities that were generated down on "K" street in DC had a lot to do with the financial disaster. Truth be told Bush is too stupid to have been involved with the "derivative" scheme. But his reaction to the 9/11 attack was like a scared little girl. He failed miserably because he has huge character flaws and it showed time and time again as he screwed the pooch over and over dealing with what was in reality a very spectacular and successful terror plot. In truth it was just a crime. There were just a handful of people involved, mostly Saudis, and Bush just went into full retard in his failed attempt to make those still alive pay for their crime. Bush USED it to become the war president he had been talking about for a long time before he even got elected. Cheney on the other hand used the attack to make his then failing company and their executives wealthy. Their hubris was STUNNING.

It's not that complicated, Clinton when he deregulated had a large part in the recession. The credit boom that started in the 80s and increased for decades unfettered. It didn't matter who was President, that recession was going to hit. I can't believe it didn't start in 2001 but somehow it was staved off until 2008.

The rest of your rant is biased BS that I refuse to rehash.

No one asked or need ask YOUR permission to "rehash" the events of the previous two presidents. I agree fully that Clinton succumbed to the attacks on his personal failings and rolled over with his legs up in the air and took it in the ass to make the BJ in the white house go away. Clinton himself agrees with you about the deregulation's he was a party to. My personal beef with him was the tv/radio ownership deregulation which put the power of the airways into the hands of a very few. Most of the progressive radio shows were taken off the air as a result. They were replaced by religious and unnecessary sports shows in markets that were doing well with the progressive shows. The conglomerates were happy to lose money just to shut up the political enemies of the right. I will never forgive Clinton for caving in just to have the right stop the impeachment. Again an example of a president's character flaws leading to a worse America.

Since the takeover of the major tv/radio markets there has been a 24/7 non stop hate program run against Obama. It is no wonder many Americans believe this BS as that is all they see and hear. With no public access over the free airways that would gladly offer other perspectives those venues do not exist other than a small handful on the pay for access channels like Sirus.

I don't care if you say "I rant". Someone has to offer the truth against the lies that are common on this message board. I know that you and people like you will do anything to try to prevent the truth from seeing the light of day. If it bothers you so much just don't read my posts.

 

[Papageorgio]

Status Quo has gotten us nowhere. Corporate influence is stronger than ever , let just let it continue.

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

It's too complicated to say any one individual is responsible for the disasters that occurred and were manufactured when Bush was president. But one thing we cannot dismiss is that Bush was in charge of a lot of it.

Bush was in charge of rushing to war with scant and false evidence. Being the CIC and throwing your hands up in disbelief and saying it wasn't his fault because so and so turned out to be a liar is too flimsy to be believed by Americans. I'm sorry but THAT just isn't good enough.

The activities that were generated down on "K" street in DC had a lot to do with the financial disaster. Truth be told Bush is too stupid to have been involved with the "derivative" scheme. But his reaction to the 9/11 attack was like a scared little girl. He failed miserably because he has huge character flaws and it showed time and time again as he screwed the pooch over and over dealing with what was in reality a very spectacular and successful terror plot. In truth it was just a crime. There were just a handful of people involved, mostly Saudis, and Bush just went into full retard in his failed attempt to make those still alive pay for their crime. Bush USED it to become the war president he had been talking about for a long time before he even got elected. Cheney on the other hand used the attack to make his then failing company and their executives wealthy. Their hubris was STUNNING.

It's not that complicated, Clinton when he deregulated had a large part in the recession. The credit boom that started in the 80s and increased for decades unfettered. It didn't matter who was President, that recession was going to hit. I can't believe it didn't start in 2001 but somehow it was staved off until 2008.

The rest of your rant is biased BS that I refuse to rehash.

No one asked or need ask YOUR permission to "rehash" the events of the previous two presidents. I agree fully that Clinton succumbed to the attacks on his personal failings and rolled over with his legs up in the air and took it in the ass to make the BJ in the white house go away. Clinton himself agrees with you about the deregulation's he was a party to. My personal beef with him was the tv/radio ownership deregulation which put the power of the airways into the hands of a very few. Most of the progressive radio shows were taken off the air as a result. They were replaced by religious and unnecessary sports shows in markets that were doing well with the progressive shows. The conglomerates were happy to lose money just to shut up the political enemies of the right. I will never forgive Clinton for caving in just to have the right stop the impeachment. Again an example of a president's character flaws leading to a worse America.

Since the takeover of the major tv/radio markets there has been a 24/7 non stop hate program run against Obama. It is no wonder many Americans believe this BS as that is all they see and hear. With no public access over the free airways that would gladly offer other perspectives those venues do not exist other than a small handful on the pay for access channels like Sirus.

I don't care if you say "I rant". Someone has to offer the truth against the lies that are common on this message board. I know that you and people like you will do anything to try to prevent the truth from seeing the light of day. If it bothers you so much just don't read my posts.

Yeah, truth. Lol! Funny a lot of what you call the truth is really just one mans opinion.

Yeah and all those high rated progressive shows. Lol!

 

[HUGGY]

I guess you have forgotten the state of ours and the world's economies at the end of Bush's "corporate driven" administration.

How silly of you to be so forgetful. Don't fret. It's just like misplacing your car keys and allowing someone to borrow your car when you find the keys and drive it off the road into a ravine. Except that your car was worth several trillion dollars. Ya that "corporate" influence really did well for the world and us. How many of those corporate pirates went to prison? None? No way! None? Really?

Oh YA!!! Lets have another serving of THAT!

If I were to believe the liberal bullshit that it was all Bush's fault. I forecasted 2008 in the mid 90's, I was actually surprised the economy rebounded after 2001. And it matters not what one President did, it was a series of events that started and the end of the Great Depression.

It matters not who the President or who is in Congress, the corporations are in control and have been for decades. Both parties are in their pockets. That is where change needs to be made in Congress.

It's too complicated to say any one individual is responsible for the disasters that occurred and were manufactured when Bush was president. But one thing we cannot dismiss is that Bush was in charge of a lot of it.

Bush was in charge of rushing to war with scant and false evidence. Being the CIC and throwing your hands up in disbelief and saying it wasn't his fault because so and so turned out to be a liar is too flimsy to be believed by Americans. I'm sorry but THAT just isn't good enough.

The activities that were generated down on "K" street in DC had a lot to do with the financial disaster. Truth be told Bush is too stupid to have been involved with the "derivative" scheme. But his reaction to the 9/11 attack was like a scared little girl. He failed miserably because he has huge character flaws and it showed time and time again as he screwed the pooch over and over dealing with what was in reality a very spectacular and successful terror plot. In truth it was just a crime. There were just a handful of people involved, mostly Saudis, and Bush just went into full retard in his failed attempt to make those still alive pay for their crime. Bush USED it to become the war president he had been talking about for a long time before he even got elected. Cheney on the other hand used the attack to make his then failing company and their executives wealthy. Their hubris was STUNNING.

It's not that complicated, Clinton when he deregulated had a large part in the recession. The credit boom that started in the 80s and increased for decades unfettered. It didn't matter who was President, that recession was going to hit. I can't believe it didn't start in 2001 but somehow it was staved off until 2008.

The rest of your rant is biased BS that I refuse to rehash.

No one asked or need ask YOUR permission to "rehash" the events of the previous two presidents. I agree fully that Clinton succumbed to the attacks on his personal failings and rolled over with his legs up in the air and took it in the ass to make the BJ in the white house go away. Clinton himself agrees with you about the deregulation's he was a party to. My personal beef with him was the tv/radio ownership deregulation which put the power of the airways into the hands of a very few. Most of the progressive radio shows were taken off the air as a result. They were replaced by religious and unnecessary sports shows in markets that were doing well with the progressive shows. The conglomerates were happy to lose money just to shut up the political enemies of the right. I will never forgive Clinton for caving in just to have the right stop the impeachment. Again an example of a president's character flaws leading to a worse America.

Since the takeover of the major tv/radio markets there has been a 24/7 non stop hate program run against Obama. It is no wonder many Americans believe this BS as that is all they see and hear. With no public access over the free airways that would gladly offer other perspectives those venues do not exist other than a small handful on the pay for access channels like Sirus.

I don't care if you say "I rant". Someone has to offer the truth against the lies that are common on this message board. I know that you and people like you will do anything to try to prevent the truth from seeing the light of day. If it bothers you so much just don't read my posts.

Yeah, truth. Lol! Funny a lot of what you call the truth is really just one mans opinion.
Yeah and all those high rated progressive shows. Lol!

That's right...just snuff out all opinion and fact that doesn't suit your agenda. Perfect. That makes America FREE to only hear and see YOUR opinion. Reminds me of a certain German's idea of freedom around 70 years ago.

I guess that's why you think you can make up history to suit your opinions. When you have such a low opinion of truth and facts I can see you believe everyone gets to make up their own version of events.

How convenient.