Trump calls Elizabeth Warren 'Pocahontas' at event honoring Native Americans

[Postmodernism Sux]

Bwahaha, yet another Googly Image plopped as if it makes a point.

Unfortunately what it says in the caption never happened. If it had --- you could document it. You know, with something more credible that a Googly Image or a Photoshop or a sterotype slur.

But it does speak volumes that that's the well y'all go to, doesn't it.

She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees.

The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”


Elizabeth Warren, Progressive Fraud

The Boston Globe article in the first link is behind a pay wall but you can read the title for a second before it comes up and somebody fortunately copy/pasted it to freerepublic:

Records shed more light on Elizabeth Warren’s minority status

 

[Roudy]

Blah blah blah. If she takes the DNA test and proves she's from one or more regions in Europe, there is no ******* way she's a "Native American", and she knows it. She lied and rigged the system to advance her career, like a typical entitled Leftard. Case closed.

How can you be this degree of ******* stupid. Seriously did you take a mail order course or what?

NOBODY around here is exclusively "from Europe". And that isn't even how the test works. There is no "exclusive" in it,capice? It doesn't "rule out" a ******* thing. It renders relative probabilities, not absolutes.

And again this isn't her issue --- IT'S YOURS.

YOURS is the ass-sertion "she lied" , therefore YOURS is the burden of proof. There is just no way you can weasel out of that. It's part and parcel of the deal when you make an assertion in the first place.

Holy SHIT

Yes, you ignorant dickhead, a Somali immgrant testing his / her DNA will trace their DNA to Africa, a WASP like Elizabeth Warren will trace her DNA to Europe, like ALL WASP's. That's why there is so much money in DNA testing now, people want to see where their ancestors are from.

This from one of the companies that do this. Note the use of the word "may" and that it does not say "will".

For the extremely ignorant. that means the test is not accurate enough to determine lack of native American heritage

"The AncestryDNA test may predict if you are at least partly Native American, which includes some tribes that are indigenous to North America, including the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The results do not currently provide a specific tribal affiliation. (Please note that your AncestryDNA ethnicity results cannot be used as a substitute for legal documentation.)"

There ya go proving my point. If the results only show various Western or Eastern European ethnicities such as Poland, England, Romania, then Native American is definitely out of the question.

So, you can't ******* read. The test may predict does not mean it will or can.

If the test would identify Native American then that sentence would say so. Instead it said it might.

Again dipweed, if there's only European in her DNA, then Native American, Chinese, and Eskimo are out, RealDumb. The fact that she refuses the test is evidence that she wilingly defrauded those organizations In essence she's a charlatan.

 

[Roudy]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

 

[Pogo]

How can you be this degree of ******* stupid. Seriously did you take a mail order course or what?

NOBODY around here is exclusively "from Europe". And that isn't even how the test works. There is no "exclusive" in it,capice? It doesn't "rule out" a ******* thing. It renders relative probabilities, not absolutes.

And again this isn't her issue --- IT'S YOURS.

YOURS is the ass-sertion "she lied" , therefore YOURS is the burden of proof. There is just no way you can weasel out of that. It's part and parcel of the deal when you make an assertion in the first place.

Holy SHIT

Yes, you ignorant dickhead, a Somali immgrant testing his / her DNA will trace their DNA to Africa, a WASP like Elizabeth Warren will trace her DNA to Europe, like ALL WASP's. That's why there is so much money in DNA testing now, people want to see where their ancestors are from.

This from one of the companies that do this. Note the use of the word "may" and that it does not say "will".

For the extremely ignorant. that means the test is not accurate enough to determine lack of native American heritage

"The AncestryDNA test may predict if you are at least partly Native American, which includes some tribes that are indigenous to North America, including the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The results do not currently provide a specific tribal affiliation. (Please note that your AncestryDNA ethnicity results cannot be used as a substitute for legal documentation.)"

There ya go proving my point. If the results only show various Western or Eastern European ethnicities such as Poland, England, Romania, then Native American is definitely out of the question.

So, you can't ******* read. The test may predict does not mean it will or can.

If the test would identify Native American then that sentence would say so. Instead it said it might.

Again dipweed, if there's only European in her DNA, then Native American, Chinese, and Eskimo are out, RealDumb. The fact that she refuses the test is evidence that she wilingly defrauded those organizations In essence she's a charlatan.

Once AGAIN --- (a) nothing is "out" in a DNA test, and (b) none of what Warren related about her own family lore was ever for your benefit in the first place.

File this under "Two things you don't get because you're obsessed with political message board "points".

 

[Pogo]

Bwahaha, yet another Googly Image plopped as if it makes a point.

Unfortunately what it says in the caption never happened. If it had --- you could document it. You know, with something more credible that a Googly Image or a Photoshop or a sterotype slur.

But it does speak volumes that that's the well y'all go to, doesn't it.

She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees.

The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”


Elizabeth Warren, Progressive Fraud

The Boston Globe article in the first link is behind a pay wall but you can read the title for a second before it comes up and somebody fortunately copy/pasted it to freerepublic:

Records shed more light on Elizabeth Warren’s minority status

From several years ago, Dippy --- and already exposed in previous threads that also went nowhere:

>> Even so, the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” << --- FactCheck​

Point proven, case closed. As I just said, if what's in the Googly Image ever actually happened, it could be documented. Just as "she lied" could. Whelp, I just documented the reverse, so it would appear the poster who trotted out the Googly Image (and then ran away) is the klown who "lied".

Hope that chair's comfy because that's what you're sitting in.

And by the way Stupid --- "Progressives" left the building a hundred years ago, Dumbass.

 

[Pogo]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Nobody claimed them as "evidence". Frank's playing with his strawman dolls again.

We just did this a few minutes ago but I understand the memory is the second thing to go.

 

[RealDave]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

It is a trait. Used in conjunction with family stories.

 

[RealDave]

How can you be this degree of ******* stupid. Seriously did you take a mail order course or what?

NOBODY around here is exclusively "from Europe". And that isn't even how the test works. There is no "exclusive" in it,capice? It doesn't "rule out" a ******* thing. It renders relative probabilities, not absolutes.

And again this isn't her issue --- IT'S YOURS.

YOURS is the ass-sertion "she lied" , therefore YOURS is the burden of proof. There is just no way you can weasel out of that. It's part and parcel of the deal when you make an assertion in the first place.

Holy SHIT

Yes, you ignorant dickhead, a Somali immgrant testing his / her DNA will trace their DNA to Africa, a WASP like Elizabeth Warren will trace her DNA to Europe, like ALL WASP's. That's why there is so much money in DNA testing now, people want to see where their ancestors are from.

This from one of the companies that do this. Note the use of the word "may" and that it does not say "will".

For the extremely ignorant. that means the test is not accurate enough to determine lack of native American heritage

"The AncestryDNA test may predict if you are at least partly Native American, which includes some tribes that are indigenous to North America, including the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The results do not currently provide a specific tribal affiliation. (Please note that your AncestryDNA ethnicity results cannot be used as a substitute for legal documentation.)"

There ya go proving my point. If the results only show various Western or Eastern European ethnicities such as Poland, England, Romania, then Native American is definitely out of the question.

So, you can't ******* read. The test may predict does not mean it will or can.

If the test would identify Native American then that sentence would say so. Instead it said it might.

Again dipweed, if there's only European in her DNA, then Native American, Chinese, and Eskimo are out, RealDumb. The fact that she refuses the test is evidence that she wilingly defrauded those organizations In essence she's a charlatan.

Jesus fick buddy. The site says that you can't use it to rule oput as they say it might reveal native american heritage.


You people are such ******* assholes having a fit about Warren while voting for Trump who claimed his father was from Sweden when he was from Germany. A lie (By Trump or his father) told purposefully to gain in business.
]
So shove this crap up your fat ignorant ass.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Bwahaha, yet another Googly Image plopped as if it makes a point.

Unfortunately what it says in the caption never happened. If it had --- you could document it. You know, with something more credible that a Googly Image or a Photoshop or a sterotype slur.

But it does speak volumes that that's the well y'all go to, doesn't it.

She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees.

The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”


Elizabeth Warren, Progressive Fraud

The Boston Globe article in the first link is behind a pay wall but you can read the title for a second before it comes up and somebody fortunately copy/pasted it to freerepublic:

Records shed more light on Elizabeth Warren’s minority status

From several years ago, Dippy --- and already exposed in previous threads that also went nowhere:

>> Even so, the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” << --- FactCheck​

Point proven, case closed. As I just said, if what's in the Googly Image ever actually happened, it could be documented. Just as "she lied" could. Whelp, I just documented the reverse, so it would appear the poster who trotted out the Googly Image (and then ran away) is the klown who "lied".

Hope that chair's comfy because that's what you're sitting in.

And by the way Stupid --- "Progressives" left the building a hundred years ago, Dumbass.

They can claim whatever the hell they want after the fact, but as demonstrated by the Globe Article she listed herself on a legal directory used by deans and hiring committees, she lied, that's a proven fact you stupid ****.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Nobody claimed them as "evidence".

Lying ******:

For weeks, Warren struggled to own the narrative, giving more fodder to her opponents. Our colleagues on The Fix wrote in detail the twists and turns of her response, including a reference to a relative’s “high cheekbones” at one point.

Why Donald Trump calls Elizabeth Warren ‘Pocahontas’

 

[Pogo]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Nobody claimed them as "evidence".

Lying ******:

For weeks, Warren struggled to own the narrative, giving more fodder to her opponents. Our colleagues on The Fix wrote in detail the twists and turns of her response, including a reference to a relative’s “high cheekbones” at one point.

Why Donald Trump calls Elizabeth Warren ‘Pocahontas’

Go **** yourself noob. I declared the Googly Image to be mendacious, and I just proved it. End of story, go suck moose cock.

 

[Pogo]

Bwahaha, yet another Googly Image plopped as if it makes a point.

Unfortunately what it says in the caption never happened. If it had --- you could document it. You know, with something more credible that a Googly Image or a Photoshop or a sterotype slur.

But it does speak volumes that that's the well y'all go to, doesn't it.

She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees.

The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”


Elizabeth Warren, Progressive Fraud

The Boston Globe article in the first link is behind a pay wall but you can read the title for a second before it comes up and somebody fortunately copy/pasted it to freerepublic:

Records shed more light on Elizabeth Warren’s minority status

From several years ago, Dippy --- and already exposed in previous threads that also went nowhere:

>> Even so, the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” << --- FactCheck​

Point proven, case closed. As I just said, if what's in the Googly Image ever actually happened, it could be documented. Just as "she lied" could. Whelp, I just documented the reverse, so it would appear the poster who trotted out the Googly Image (and then ran away) is the klown who "lied".

Hope that chair's comfy because that's what you're sitting in.

And by the way Stupid --- "Progressives" left the building a hundred years ago, Dumbass.

They can claim whatever the hell they want after the fact, but as demonstrated by the Globe Article she listed herself on a legal directory used by deans and hiring committees, she lied, that's a proven fact you stupid ****.

Oh look -- Stupid still hasn't learned to read. Guess I'll just repost what was already posted until it starts to sink in.

>> In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” <<​

And guess what. Next time that has to be reposted because you still didn't get it, it's gonna say the same thing. Stupid asshole.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Bwahaha, yet another Googly Image plopped as if it makes a point.

Unfortunately what it says in the caption never happened. If it had --- you could document it. You know, with something more credible that a Googly Image or a Photoshop or a sterotype slur.

But it does speak volumes that that's the well y'all go to, doesn't it.

She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees.

The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”


Elizabeth Warren, Progressive Fraud

The Boston Globe article in the first link is behind a pay wall but you can read the title for a second before it comes up and somebody fortunately copy/pasted it to freerepublic:

Records shed more light on Elizabeth Warren’s minority status

From several years ago, Dippy --- and already exposed in previous threads that also went nowhere:

>> Even so, the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” << --- FactCheck​

Point proven, case closed. As I just said, if what's in the Googly Image ever actually happened, it could be documented. Just as "she lied" could. Whelp, I just documented the reverse, so it would appear the poster who trotted out the Googly Image (and then ran away) is the klown who "lied".

Hope that chair's comfy because that's what you're sitting in.

And by the way Stupid --- "Progressives" left the building a hundred years ago, Dumbass.

They can claim whatever the hell they want after the fact, but as demonstrated by the Globe Article she listed herself on a legal directory used by deans and hiring committees, she lied, that's a proven fact you stupid ****.

Oh look -- Stupid still hasn't learned to read. Guess I'll just repost what was already posted until it starts to sink in.

>> In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.” <<​

And guess what. Next time that has to be reposted because you still didn't get it, it's gonna say the same thing. Stupid asshole.

Yes she was recruited from legal directory where she listed herself as Native American you stupid ******.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Nobody claimed them as "evidence".

Lying ******:

For weeks, Warren struggled to own the narrative, giving more fodder to her opponents. Our colleagues on The Fix wrote in detail the twists and turns of her response, including a reference to a relative’s “high cheekbones” at one point.

Why Donald Trump calls Elizabeth Warren ‘Pocahontas’

Go **** yourself noob. I declared the Googly Image to be mendacious, and I just proved it. End of story, go suck moose cock.

You didn't prove a ******* thing in fact I just proved she did reference high cheekbones as evidence.

 

[Political Junky]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

So they were invaders too, not natives. Interesting.

 

[Pogo]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

So they were invaders too, not natives. Interesting.

Who were they "invading"?

This oughta be good.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

So they were invaders too, not natives. Interesting.

Who were they "invading"?

This oughta be good.

They were invading the territory.

 

[Pogo]

Cheekbones are not evidence

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

So they were invaders too, not natives. Interesting.

Who were they "invading"?

This oughta be good.

They were invading the territory.

WHOSE territory?

I knew this would work....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Exactly, Asians have high cheekbones too.

Because Native Americans came from Asia.

So they were invaders too, not natives. Interesting.

Who were they "invading"?

This oughta be good.

They were invading the territory.

WHOSE territory?

I knew this would work....

They invaded empty territory.

You see, they weren't native to that territory.