Trump barred from running?

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Wrong. The 14th Amendment doesn't mention the presidency. Try harder.

Does not have to.

 

[konradv]

View attachment 830913

It’s there for a reason. If it were a one shot deal having to do with the Civil War, a law would have sufficed.

 

[konradv]

Wrong. The 14th Amendment doesn't mention the presidency. Try harder.

It mentions anyone that swore an oath to the US government. That means Trump.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Oh ... then you think the hundreds rioting on Jan 6th was lawful ... got it ... the minority can murder if they want to ... is that the New Conservative Platform? ...

No ... he's not charged with insurrection ... I never said he was ... does the 14th Amendment say anything about voting? ...

Yes, On January 6, Ashley Babbitt was murdered by a black BLM supporter and he did it without consequences.

What point are you trying to make, again?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yes, Trump is liable under the 14th. Yes, the President is the presiding officer of the US govenrment. NO way around that.

 

[Lastamender]

If J6 gets a conviction, then it is a possibility, yes.

If elected, Trump will be in remandment, and he will be unable to govern,

The 25th Amendment will be invoked by the VP, and according to the instructions of it, he will be removed permanently from office,

So Trump's VP is going to throw him out of office? Are you retarded?

 

[Mac1958]

It mentions anyone that swore an oath to the US government. That means Trump.

Yeah, but he was just kidding.

He kids. He's a kidder. He was kidding.

 

[konradv]

Some of these leftists are trying everything they can dream up to suppress the votes of half the country, aren’t they? And THAT is the threat to democracy.

Didn’t dream up the 14A and it doesn’t just apply to the Civil War.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Cheat or be beat is the Democracked's motto

 

[ozro]

So Trump's VP is going to throw him out of office? Are you retarded?

Yes, it is retarded.

 

[Lastamender]

Yeah, but he was just kidding.

He kids. He's a kidder. He was kidding.

I guess the Congress was kidding too when they refused to investigate the 2020 election. They violated their oath of office by siding with the alleged fraud.

 

[Independent thinker]

LOL. So, you want my opinion on 14A, eh? Sorry, bud. Doesn't work that way. Answer my question first and then we will get to yours.

Unless you are chicken? Admit it and I will give you my opinion on 14A. Deal?

Your opinion on 14A is irrelevant.

 

[Hellbilly]

Thoughts? Whines?

I guess your hero is safe....for now.

 

[Lastamender]

Didn’t dream up the 14A and it doesn’t just apply to the Civil War.

And your law degree is from?

 

[Lisa558]

Oh ... then you think the hundreds rioting on Jan 6th was lawful ... got it ... the minority can murder if they want to ... is that the New Conservative Platform? ...

It wasn’t lawful, but it sure wasn’t on the level we saw with the George Floyd riots. The latter saw 30 people killed!

No ... he's not charged with insurrection ... I never said he was ... does the 14th Amendment say anything about voting? ...

It says an Insurrectionist stays off the ballot. Since that doesn’t apply to Trump, it’s clear this is an unconstitutional attempt to deprive half the country of a vote for their preferred candidate.

 

[konradv]

Yeah, but he was just kidding.

He kids. He's a kidder. He was kidding.

Should we tell him we were just kidding about lifetime SS protection? I guess he wouldn’t need it, if he’s getting lifetime DOC protection.

 

[konradv]

And your law degree is from?

Same place you got yours.

 

[Lastamender]

Should we tell him we were just kidding about lifetime SS protection? I guess he wouldn’t need it, if he’s getting lifetime DOC protection.

You have told RFK Jr. that.

 

[Rawley]

It’s there for a reason. If it were a one shot deal having to do with the Civil War, a law would have sufficed.

Nope The law would be in conflict with the Appointments Clause

 

[ozro]

If Trump, or anyone else can be barred from being placed on the ballot prior from being convicted of any crime, then millions of voters will be able to be disenfranchised from voting based on who they previously voted for.
For example; That guy(and millions of others) voted for Trump, Trump is an insurrectionist and is banned, ergo that guy(and millions of others) are banned from voting. We win!
That looks like the plan, far-fetched has it sounds, that looks like the plan.