Trump approves major arms shipments to the Ukraine

JLW

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
18,302
Reaction score
20,188
Points
2,405
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?


 
Last edited:
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files.


This strikes a decent balance. Ukraine gets help defending its borders without triggering direct NATO involvement, and the U.S. avoids a ground war if things escalate. I’ve been clear I support Ukraine’s independence — and this helps them stand without handing Putin a propaganda win about NATO expansion.
 
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?


This has apparently caused Russia to move on to the final solution against the US and Nato countries.

The complete destruction of Kiev.

Peace was always so easy. Russia never wanted anything more than security against US aggression.

Does America even care if Kiev is burnt to the ground?
 
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?



Trump is a lying conman...


trump war toy soldiers.webp


+

Trump putin bunkers.webp
 
Ukraine is disappearing .

Stable door
Bolted
Horse
Shutting
etc etc



The situation in the Ukrainian SMO on July 13 2025

Ukraine in Shock: Two Major Cities Fall – Russia Cuts the Country in Half

Myrne has fallen | Russians advance east of Pokrovsk [13 July 2025]

Professor Dmitry Evstafiev says Trump is a wounded hog

The Russian Federation will agree to a meeting between Putin and Zelensky only after Kiev's surrender, stated Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kyslytsia in an interview with The Kiev Independent, citing the Russian delegation in Istanbul.
 
NATO will pilfer many of the weapons to replenish their own depleted stores. Then again, why not if they are going to pay for them.
 
Trump is doing a major betrayal of the voters by doing this. People didn't want this, now Trump is doing it. Trump is to not be trusted.
 
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?


Trump, being the transactionalist he is, gave Putin ample chances. This was predictable. Putin overplayed his hand.
 
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?



This is drastic change in policy by 47. He must angry Pooty after all.
 
15th post
If Trump plans anything that could cause Russia to consider their use of nuclear weapons, the Penagon will react to eliminate the danger he's promoting.

If he persists against the Pentagon and the advice of the Generals then he will become a threat to America that has to be dealt with definitively!

America's PNAC agenda doesn't die on the vine with Russia's complete destruction of the Ukraine. Collateral!

America is still not defeated by Russia and so nuclear weapons have to still be the last option. Trump will be coached to understand that! Or else!
 
Trump 2024 "I will end the war in 24 hours with a phone call"

Trump 2025 "Just kidding. I will continue the war"
 

Tulsi still persists in being the Trump ship's loose cannon.

Gabbard's remarks came after the Trump administration’s controversial decision not to release the ‘Epstein list’. Officials have denied the existence of any document naming alleged high-profile associates of the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The decision has drawn criticism from some commentators, who see it as evidence of the deep state’s enduring influence.

Cunter-intuitive? Read between the lines. This young lady is destined to do something great!
 
The plan works as follows: the weapons will go through NATO and NATO will ship the weapons to the Ukraine. NATO will pay for the weapons.

It is a win for the Ukraine and a win for the US.

Sending weapons to help the Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression is a thousand times more preferable than the US having to send its own troops if Russia attacks a NATO ally.

I seldom praise Trump, but I will on this deal.

I wonder how MAGAs feel who have so often said they have nothing but disdain for the Ukraine and wanted the US out of it altogether.

Was this another reversal by Trump, just like on the Epstein files?


It's not "the" Ukraine. No "the".
 
Back
Top Bottom