Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 47,211
- 20,481
- 2,173
Your deep seated partisan bias prevents you from understanding the story. That’s why you need to come up with baseless conspiracies.Not at all what the story says
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your deep seated partisan bias prevents you from understanding the story. That’s why you need to come up with baseless conspiracies.Not at all what the story says
Probably not. SCOTUS has decided that almost nothing is illegal for the president.Which is illegal!
All this techno talk. Its endless and yet you screw up everything you touch.Your post makes absolutely no sense. If he had knowledge of massive corruption he would used that evidence to reach a plea deal. The reason the charges were dropped was qui pro quo. Help us and we will help you….or else.
So much for prosecuting for crimes without fear or FAVOR!Probably not. SCOTUS has decided that almost nothing is illegal for the president.
There is no fine line here. What trump did is overtly corrupt. BTW, the only legacy trump has is one of illegality and corruption.It's a fine line and I hope Trump doesn't hurt his legacy by supporting the wrong situations and/or people. There is an immense challenge for him this term and there are going to be some errors or miscalculations though he might not view this pardon as one of them.
There is no fine line here. What trump did is overtly corrupt. BTW, the only legacy trump has is one of illegality and corruption.
A. The Government Does Not Have a Valid Basis To Seek Dismissal
Mr. Bove's memorandum identifies two grounds for the contemplated dismissal. I cannot advance either argument in good faith. As you know, the Government “may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment” under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a ). “The principal object of the 'leave of court' requirement is apparently to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment, e.g. , charging, dismissing, and recharging, when the Government moves to dismiss an indictment over the defendant's objection.” Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 30 n.15 ( 1977). “But the Rule has also been held to permit the court to deny a Government dismissal motion to which the defendant has consented if the motion is prompted by considerations clearly contrary to the public interest. ” Id.; see also JM § 9-2.050 (reflecting Department's position that a "court may decline leave to dismiss if the manifest public interest requires it”). The reasons advanced by Mr. Bove for dismissing the indictment are not ones I can in good faith defend as in the public interest and as consistent with the principles of impartiality and fairness that guide my decision-making.
First, Mr. Bove proposes dismissing the charges against Adams in return for his assistance in enforcing the federal immigration laws, analogizing to the prisoner exchange in which the United States freed notorious Russian arms dealer Victor Bout in return for an American prisoner in Russia. Such an exchange with Adams violates commonsense beliefs in the equal administration of justice, the Justice Manual, and the Rules of Professional Conduct. The "commitment to the rule of law is nowhere more profoundly manifest” than in criminal justice. Cheney v. United States Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 384 (2004) (alterations and citation omitted). Impartial enforcement of the law is the bedrock of federal prosecutions. See Robert H. Jackson, The Federal Prosecutor, 24 J. Am. Jud. Soc'y 18 (1940). As the Justice Manual has long recognized, “the rule of law depends upon the evenhanded administration of justice. The legal judgments of the Department of Justice must be impartial and insulated from political influence. ” JM § 1-8.100. But Adams has argued in substance and Mr. Bove appears prepared to concede that Adams should receive leniency for federal crimes solely because he occupies an important public position and can use that position to assist in the Administration's policy priorities.
https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/24535586a908999e/3801d435-full.pdf
At some point the DoJ is going to have to find someone willing to go in front of the presiding judge and explain why they requested the case be dropped. That's a problem for cucks like Bove because there is no justification for it.Which is illegal!
There is no reason for Bove to tell members of Sassoon's team to stop taking notes other than him not wanting a contemporaneous record of what was discussed during the meeting.
Great! Let the swamp drain themselves.Well....I don't think the "Deep State" got to Danielle Sassoon, since she is a conservative Federalist Society attorney and she was hired by the Trump Administration less than 3 weeks ago.
Here's the thing, MAGA acolytes -- all of this is going to end badly for Trump. The truth always wins in the end. DOJ attorneys are not going to disgrace themselves for Trump and his corruption.
If the swamp was self-draining Bove, trump, and Bondi would resign.Great! Let the swamp drain themselves.
These resignations are getting spicy.DOJ will need ‘fool,’ ‘coward’ to toss Eric Adams case, says seventh prosecutor to resign over order
A seventh federal prosecutor resigned Friday over the Department of Justice’s controversial order to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams.
The prosecutor, Hagan Scotten, in a blistering letter to top DOJ official Emil Bove, said “I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion” to dismiss the Adams case.
“But it was never going to be me,” wrote Scotten, who had been the lead prosecutor in Adams’ case for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.
On Thursday, Scotten’s boss, acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon resigned in protest over Bove’s order to toss the case.
Within hours of Sassoon quitting, five top prosecutors at the DOJ resigned, rather than execute Bove’s order.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/14/trump-eric-adams-doj-danielle-sassoon-resign.html
Here's another early test for the admin and Bondi. Obviously, Bove needs to be fired. The problem being she was likely complicit in trying to get the case against Adams dismissed. So they will try to sweep this under the rug quickly. Good luck with that.
You mean his OWN corruption
Later dudes and dudettesWell....I don't think the "Deep State" got to Danielle Sassoon, since she is a conservative Federalist Society attorney and she was hired by the Trump Administration less than 3 weeks ago.
Here's the thing, MAGA acolytes -- all of this is going to end badly for Trump. The truth always wins in the end. DOJ attorneys are not going to disgrace themselves for Trump and his corruption.
Let me bring it down for you.You keep saying shit with no support.
Face it nurse. You’re not just a troll — but you’re also not at all convincing.
You don't have to....but I speak the truth about you, whether you want to acknowledge that truth or not.I don't care what Dr. thinks.
Making excuses for Trump's corrupt behavior....like a good little MAGA fascist.Only because like Andy Cuomo, the Socialist democrats wanted to push him out for his Americans > Illegals Thought Crimes
Different issue, Kleetus. No quid pro quo involving Reno, Bill Clinton, and a corrupt mayor.But nary a peep from hacks like you when dems fired hundreds when they took over. Nobody listens to your lies.
"In 1993, Attorney General Janet Reno demanded the resignations of all 93 U.S. attorneys in the early days of the Clinton administration."
![]()
Biden's Justice Department to ask nearly all Trump-era U.S. attorneys to resign
John Durham of Connecticut will remain to lead the investigation of the origins of the Russia probe, and U.S. attorney for Delaware David Weiss will also remain.www.nbcnews.com
His AFSC Code was 3F1X1 , i.e. a cook , 20 years in KPLet me bring it down for you.
I spent 20 years in the Air Froce, protecting this country from Nazi trash such as yourself. I'm not going to pretend that your opinion matters. You are a disgusting, despicable human being.
You want Trump to "win" at all costs. You are a radicalized, dangerous adherent to the MAGA QAnon religion. Your moral compass fell down a black hole a long time ago.