- Jan 27, 2017
- 22,221
- 28,258
- 2,415
Already done.Impeach that bastard!!
A piss poor job of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already done.Impeach that bastard!!
Getting better all the time.Already done.Impeach that bastard!!
A piss poor job of it.
Getting better all the time.Already done.Impeach that bastard!!
A piss poor job of it.
That's the sort of service one can expect from the best IMPOTUS evah!Well huffy po did report potus also personally stops by and adds extra lead for kicks
Well I drink water straight out of the tap, but then I don't have Individual1 trying to poison me. Drink hearty.Yas all drink filtered or bottled water anyway
Well I drink water straight out of the tap, but then I don't have Individual1 trying to poison me. Drink hearty.Yas all drink filtered or bottled water anyway
It is very likely to end up in a water table.And if it's a puddle that is never connected to a waterway, the government should still have total control, because it's water.
I love how control of shit entering waterways becomes total control in paranoid daydreams.Good point, the government should have total control over my land to prevent any shit on it.
Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
Lol..Someone is triggered. Despite your lies, no one is more anti-environmental than you Trumpers. The more toxins industry dumps into your water supply, the more your type loves it no matter who it injures. You know why? Because that is how sheep act.Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
Lol they're so nazi gay and full of shit
Reason does not exactly have the biggest collection of trump supporters derp
Plus with socialisms abysmal record on the environment any one who ever actually gave a a shit about the environment could never honestly be a socialist..... in a million years
Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
Well I drink water straight out of the tap, but then I don't have Individual1 trying to poison me. Drink hearty.Yas all drink filtered or bottled water anyway
What exactly is it that you guys hate so much about record low unemployment, record growth, upwardly mobile middle and lower classes, and keeping more of what you earn in your pocket?
Is it just that the contrast between actual progress and the dreary soul sucking misery that you guys call progress is just to difficult for you to look at?
Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
Stupid post. Ephemeral waterways are not puddles and ditches. That ridiculous rule removes protections from something like 80% of waterways in semi-arid areas like the dessert Southwest.Trump Administration Repeals Federal Protections on Puddles, Dry Stream Beds, Some Ditches
Hysterical reactions greet the White House's modest changes to federal clean water rules.
CHRISTIAN BRITSCHGI | 1.24.2020 1:45 PM
(Marty Randall/Dreamstime.com)
Another day, another barrage of hysterical reactions to a marginal regulatory reform. The latest cause for concern is the White House's finalized clean water rule that renounces the federal government's ability to regulate ponds, puddles, and (some) ditches.
Yesterday's regulation replaces the prior Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule issued by the Obama administration in 2015. The Obama-era rule was controversial from the get-go, with multiple Red states filing legal challenges claiming it exceeded the federal government's authority to regulate water pollution. A slew of federal court rulings stayed the implementation of the rule in over half the states.
The new rule released yesterday is intended to pare back the federal government's regulatory powers to something closer to what Congress intended when it passed the 1972 Clean Water Act.
"All states have their own protections for waters within their borders, and many regulate more broadly than the federal government," said Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Andy Wheeler at a homebuilding conference in Las Vegas today. Wheeler's department, alongside the Army Corp of Engineers, is responsible for writing and implementing the new clean water rule. "Our new rule recognizes this relationship and strikes the proper balance between Washington, D.C., and the states."
Most media outlets reporting on the rule change went with a different framing.
View attachment 302710
Trump destroyer of worlds !
Read the rest
Trump Administration Repeals Federal Protections on Puddles, Dry Stream Beds, Some Ditches
Insanity.
Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
You do know that the 5 in the front are probably cooling towers, venting steam?
They probably were needed because environmental rules required cooling of cooling water prior to it being returned to whatever source it came from.
Trumpers love the smell of benzene in the morning so these Trumper anti-environmental posts do not surprise me in the least.
Trumper paradise:
View attachment 302723
You do know that the 5 in the front are probably cooling towers, venting steam?
They probably were needed because environmental rules required cooling of cooling water prior to it being returned to whatever source it came from.
The stacks are also venting water vapor.
Probably a Nat gas operation. The by products are CO2 and H2O.
Jo
Stupid post. Ephemeral waterways are not puddles and ditches. That ridiculous rule removes protections from something like 80% of waterways in semi-arid areas like the dessert Southwest.Trump Administration Repeals Federal Protections on Puddles, Dry Stream Beds, Some Ditches
Hysterical reactions greet the White House's modest changes to federal clean water rules.
CHRISTIAN BRITSCHGI | 1.24.2020 1:45 PM
(Marty Randall/Dreamstime.com)
Another day, another barrage of hysterical reactions to a marginal regulatory reform. The latest cause for concern is the White House's finalized clean water rule that renounces the federal government's ability to regulate ponds, puddles, and (some) ditches.
Yesterday's regulation replaces the prior Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule issued by the Obama administration in 2015. The Obama-era rule was controversial from the get-go, with multiple Red states filing legal challenges claiming it exceeded the federal government's authority to regulate water pollution. A slew of federal court rulings stayed the implementation of the rule in over half the states.
The new rule released yesterday is intended to pare back the federal government's regulatory powers to something closer to what Congress intended when it passed the 1972 Clean Water Act.
"All states have their own protections for waters within their borders, and many regulate more broadly than the federal government," said Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Andy Wheeler at a homebuilding conference in Las Vegas today. Wheeler's department, alongside the Army Corp of Engineers, is responsible for writing and implementing the new clean water rule. "Our new rule recognizes this relationship and strikes the proper balance between Washington, D.C., and the states."
Most media outlets reporting on the rule change went with a different framing.
View attachment 302710
Trump destroyer of worlds !
Read the rest
Trump Administration Repeals Federal Protections on Puddles, Dry Stream Beds, Some Ditches
Insanity.
You got proof for that?
The extension of Waters of the United States under the 2015 ruling was overreach. It had the potential to require federal permitting for miniscule water flows above and beyond the State level permits required.
Imagine having to have a federal permit to hose your lawn if the water ran off into a catch basin. That was the potential impact.
Landowners can still be held responsible if large quantities of chemicals from their properties enter waterways.
It's almost as though you don't have freedom on your own property to vent as much cyanide as you wish into the atmosphere. Tyranny because....air.I know, it's not like the government tells you what you can do or fines you thousands of dollars a day when you do something they don't like because......water.
Whereas small quantities are enough to kill off aquatic life.Landowners can still be held responsible if large quantities of chemicals from their properties enter waterways.
I love how clean water becomes 100% control of the land in the minds of deluded paranoids. Oh well.It is very likely to end up in a water table.And if it's a puddle that is never connected to a waterway, the government should still have total control, because it's water.
You're right, the government needs 100% control over 100% of the land.
That should be part of the 2020 Dem platform.