Trump Administration Ministry of Truth to Define and Prosecute "Hate Speech"

[charlottebronte666]

I hate Pam Bondi. Is that hate speech?

 

[kyzr]

I hate Pam Bondi. Is that hate speech?

Only if you threaten her with violence. Its not that complicated

 

[buttercup]

I don't necessarily agree with every single thing he said in this tweet, but I do agree with the main point that the whole idea of "hate speech" is just another way around to attack free speech, and they're calling for something that Charlie would have been against.

 

[IM2]

Can we stop making Charlie Kirk something he wasn't? He would support this so called Ministry of Truth.

 

[buttercup]

Can we stop making Charlie Kirk something he wasn't? He would support this so called Ministry of Truth.

 

[excalibur]

Bondi has now drawn the left out, opposing laws against 'hate-speech'.

Brilliant!

 

[EMH]

CENSORSHIP is not conservative.

Pam Bondi is yet to get indictments on anything big.

Next time Congress goes on break, make Blanche the AG...

 

[EMH]

I don't necessarily agree with every single thing he said in this tweet, but I do agree with the main point that the whole idea of "hate speech" is just another way around to attack free speech, and they're calling for something that Charlie would have been against.

Not the first time Pam Bondi became terrifying. Dan and Kash wanted her out.


"Hate Speech" = noticing Epstein was jewish

 

[IM2]

And here we see a tweet from a person trying to justify his own hatred and bigotry. To give his hateful rhetoric an excuse. All the while trying to eliminate liberals.

 

[EMH]

And here we see a tweet from a person trying to justify his own hatred and bigotry. To give his hateful rhetoric an excuse. All the while trying to eliminate liberals.

LOL!!!


"hateful" = noticing fascist state sponsored DNA discrimination called "Affirmative Action"

 

[BluesLegend]

Dems you may have noticed, nobody likes you people hence the desire to PROSECUTE Dems.

 

[IM2]

Dems you may have noticed, nobody likes you people hence the desire to PROSECUTE Dems.

Nobody has noticed that. What we do notice is the fascism that you support.

 

[BluesLegend]

Nobody has noticed that. What we do notice is the fascism that you support.

Pretty sure the nation noticed last Nov loser.

 

[Foxfyre]

Only if you threaten her with violence. Its not that complicated

Not just threaten her but maliciously accuse her. Use disinformation to make the hateful and dangerous misfits out there believe she is dangerous to them or what they believe in. Suggest she must be 'neutralized' or 'cancelled' or 'eliminated' in any other way than via the ballot box.

 

[buttercup]

And here we see a tweet from a person trying to justify his own hatred and bigotry. To give his hateful rhetoric an excuse. All the while trying to eliminate liberals.

Sigh. You really don't get it, at all.

What you don't seem to understand is that any power you grant the government over people you don't like will eventually come around to you...especially when the wrong people get in power. If the First Amendment continues to be infringed, at some point speech that you believe in is going to be censored, and you will have shot yourself in the foot, by not protecting free speech, period.

Haven't you heard the famous quote:

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I hate Pam Bondi. Is that hate speech?

Blondie gotta go

The lefties gotta go

What else is new

 

[progressive hunter]

I hate Pam Bondi. Is that hate speech?

 

[toobfreak]

I don't necessarily agree with every single thing he said in this tweet, but I do agree with the main point that the whole idea of "hate speech" is just another way around to attack free speech, and they're calling for something that Charlie would have been against.

I admit that the Fed is entering choppy waters involving itself with restrictions on speech in a country DEFINED by protection of free speech.

As such, who defines and determines where free speech ends? In a sense, we already did long ago when we declared it a crime to yell fire in a crowded theater. And really, how can any individual right be /unlimited/?

Therefore, what Pam is saying (and I agree I remain least impressed by her so far), is that free speech has legal limits.

But I so much dislike the term "hate speech," it implies the viewer somehow could see into the speaker's inner thoughts and intentions of their mind.

But her goal is just because, just like yelling fire in a theater, free speech must have limits and cannot extend beyond where your actions, speech, etc, extend out into curtailing other people's rights.

Therefore, I would suggest the administration avoid the term "hate speech" and replace it with a far more accurate and enforceable one like 'incendiary speech'. Incendiary speech implies an undesirable and observable consequence, not just that you hated something since hate is an ordinary and unavoidable human condition we all suffer as hate goes hand in hand with love. Everyone hates. I hate rap music, green hair and many kinds of seafood; does that make me evil?

Bottom line: if you are in a position of influence as a public figure and you rant death to xyz or that we should kill xyz, over and over, then xyz does get murdered, you probably bear some responsibility, or at least an investigation into whether you should be responsible.

Trampling on free speech? Only if you intend to go out every day calling for the murder of everyone you disagree with. But I agree with Pam in that at this point, /something/ must be done before this thing goes any farther. Enough is enough.

As distasteful as restraining unfettered speech might be, understand that this is only necessary as the only way to deal with the growing fact that people on the Left simply won't otherwise stop calling for the death and murder of everyone they don't like while shooting at them with guns.

And it is clear now that Tyler Robinson got his chops on some social media he belonged to. He went from a fairly normal, promising young man to a radicalized murderer. Someone filled his head with murderous rage against Kirk most probably with the intent that someone act on it.

And lookie this--- turns out that once again, Tyler was all wrapped up with transgenderism.

Democrats now sound no different or better than Iranian islamic fundamentalists issuing a fatwa on someone. All the left have stopped short of doing (so far) is issuing million dollar rewards to the first people to kill this guy or that.

If leftards could simply reign it in and stop being total a-holes, none of this would be necessary.

 

[toobfreak]

Blondie gotta go

Don't say that. I have always liked Blondie.

 

[Moonglow]

I don't necessarily agree with every single thing he said in this tweet, but I do agree with the main point that the whole idea of "hate speech" is just another way around to attack free speech, and they're calling for something that Charlie would have been against.

I can still catcall her, right?