Trump administration fails to secure indictment against sandwich thrower

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I would submit the jury thought, since the officer was feted with a fake award etc. That they didn't find this constituted assault.

Because of the lack of force involved. The alleged crime simply was not committed.

 

[Delldude]

Which is the same stupid talking point, since trial juries have to be unanimous.

LOL TM

They can ignore the evidence and unanimously choose not to convict.

 

[dudmuck]

Pretty sad when you have video of the incident.

DC is a lost cause. Nothing but liberals.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL TM

They can ignore the evidence and unanimously choose not to convict.

And you can make stuff up out of thin air. So i guess we understand each other.

 

[Delldude]

And you can make stuff up out of thin air.

Explain why a jury couldn't do that.

 

[Zincwarrior]

LOL TM

They can ignore the evidence and unanimously choose not to convict.

Or they believe the evidence does not support the charge.

 

[Delldude]

Or they believe the evidence does not support the charge.

Other way around.
Indisputable assault.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Other way around.
Indisputable assault.

The jury disagreed.

 

[Delldude]

The jury disagreed.

No they chose not to convict.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Explain why a jury couldn't do that.

As soon as you explain how you know this one did, which you of course made up out of thin air.

 

[Delldude]

As soon as you explain how you know this one did, which you of course made up out of thin air.

Ha ha ha.... you claimed I made stuff up out of thin air.

Shouldn't be too hard to prove I did then.

But you've failed before you started........

 

[LeftofLeft]

Because of the lack of force involved. The alleged crime simply was not committed.

Once again, the leftist activist judges have set precedent. Throwing sandwiches at anyone you don’t like is acceptable.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ha ha ha.... you claimed I made stuff up out of thin air.

You did, when you claimed to read the minds of the jury.

The fact that you went off on a tangent and misunderstood is your fault, not mine.

Moving on....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Once again, the leftist activist judges have set precedent.

No, no precedent was set. And the jury acquitted him, not the judge. So you might want to edit.

 

[Delldude]

You did, when you claimed to read the minds of the jury.

The fact that you went off on a tangent and misunderstood is your fault, not mine.

Moving on....

Poor baby....now you wish to negotiate due to your ignorance?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So anyway... it makes sense that he was acquitted. No "force" to speak of, no injuries, cant really "impede" a person who is just standing there.

Just another blunder by the MAGA zealots, all vying for some personal political capital , after Dear Leader exits.

 

[Delldude]

So anyway... it makes sense that he was acquitted.

So anyway the jury ignored the evidence and chose not to convict.

So simple you should be able to comprehend that.....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So anyway the jury ignored the evidence and chose not to convict.

Or, in reality, didn't see any evidence of force, impediment, etc.

Because there wasn't any.

 

[drudge X]

Glad to know that leftists are pro assassination and assault.

 

[Delldude]

Or, in reality, didn't see any evidence of force, impediment, etc.

Because there wasn't any.

The evidence is overwhelming for assault...... overwhelming.

The jury decided not to convict even in the face of overwhelming evidence.