Trump...1st place...11 point lead

[BluesLegend]

Of course you did.

"What about him worries you so?"

Well, calling him names and issuing slights indicates nothing else to me. If you aren't worried about it, why would he be worth your attention?

The left has the GOP establishment candidates crouching in fear of being savaged by the left and MSM as a racist, homophobe, women hater, take you're pick. Trump comes out slams both sides on illegals, they attack and it bounces off. Then McCain the liar pokes at Trump until Trump loses his cool and blurts out a gaffe, they pile on attack him again and again the attack bounces off. Trust me they are freaked out by Trump.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Since you're defending Trump with so much energy, I can only assume that you're deeply in love with him.

So, you must think I can read your mind each time you post. If I could read minds, I wouldn't be a lazy fat man with no job. You can't just sit there and expect people to read the exact emotions you put into a post.

No, I expect people to not read any emotions into my posts.

I expect people to read my ******* posts, and respond to them as they are.

We've been over this already, and I thought you understood.

 

[BluesLegend]

And idiot compared to whom, Obama? Clinton? Do you honestly want to go there and by that I mean compare their career accomplishments to Trump? Not job titles actual accomplishments in the job. No I didn't think so.

"Idiot" isn't a comparative statement. Neither Obama nor Clinton have anything to do with Trump's idiocity.

Still waiting for you to back up your claims because facts and reality are not on you're side.

What claims are you asking me to "back up"?

Don't play dumb with me, you claimed Trump is an idiot and I asked you to back up that claim and I'm still waiting. So far nothing.

Trump is an idiot, and if you can't see that for yourself, I don't know what to tell you.

My "evidence" is everything he's ever said.

OH the irony so to back up you're claim you present evidence that is well, idiotic. Seriously "everything he's ever said" alrighty then. Basically you were just calling the guy an idiot, got called out on it, and you can't back up the claim, got it.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

"Idiot" isn't a comparative statement. Neither Obama nor Clinton have anything to do with Trump's idiocity.

Still waiting for you to back up your claims because facts and reality are not on you're side.

What claims are you asking me to "back up"?

Don't play dumb with me, you claimed Trump is an idiot and I asked you to back up that claim and I'm still waiting. So far nothing.

Trump is an idiot, and if you can't see that for yourself, I don't know what to tell you.

My "evidence" is everything he's ever said.

OH the irony so to back up you're claim you present evidence that is well, idiotic. Seriously "everything he's ever said" alrighty then. Basically you were just calling the guy an idiot, got called out on it, and you can't back up the claim, got it.

This is the funniest argument I've had in a really long time. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

I don't care if you think Donald Trump is a ******* Mensa member.

 

[TemplarKormac]

We've been over this already, and I thought you understood.

I understood you quite well Doc. I'm sorry if you think I am "reading emotions" into your posts. You don't like Trump. I get it. He's an "idiot" or an "asshole." Your language suggests your hostility. I'm not reading any emotions into your posts than what is already being shown here.

I'm not a mind reader. I don't read Tarot cards. But it doesn't take Dianna Troi to see you don't like Donald Trump.

I expect people to read my ******* posts, and respond to them as they are.

"He's an idiot" so therefore he's an idiot; "he's an asshole" so therefore he's an asshole. But why? My mode of thinking isn't so "simple" as yours. What emotions and feelings are driving such language? Where you see a finite assertion, I see one made via an emotion. Why is he an "asshole" why is he an "idiot?"

No, I expect people to not read any emotions into my posts.

In this case, how can I not?! You've been calling him names and issuing your slights and predictions, but have not even tried to rebut his positions, stating "he has no positions" or "he doesn't want to be president no more than I do."

It isn't so easy for me not to read emotion into what people say. I am of the thinking that anything that anyone says is driven by a specific emotion. I detected outright hostility from you, directed at Donald Trump. I am truly sorry if this offends you. It is a way of thought I possessed long before I came here.

 

[TemplarKormac]

theDoctorisIn

Look... the tail end of my three day vacation didn't go very well. My grandmother got sick on the way home. Perhaps this isn't the best time for me to be posting right now.

 

[Londoner]

McCain poked a snake, and now, the liberals, hypocrites that they are, are the ones most attentive to their dear Senator McCain, now that he has been bitten.

Don't poke a snake. And, Democrats are hypocrites.

Those are the lesson's I get out of it.

The liberals are not defending McCain or worried about McCain as much as they are . . .

... wondering why the Republicans have spent the past 30 years actively promoting themselves as the party that respects the troops . . . but then, when the GOPs media darling takes a historic shit on the military and says he doesn't respect prisoners of war, the Republican voter ignores it. In other words, the Left is wondering why Republicans are being such hypocrites on this issue.

Supporting the troops means that you don't allow your presidential candidates to trash them. Period. And if you don't support the troops, than stop clobbering the rest of us over the head with your supposed love for them. If you're going to allow Trump to diminish the sacrifice of a man who was captured and tortured for five years, than be my guest. Honestly, you have a right to your own values. You have the right to ignore your principals to protect your party, and I won't judge you for it - but stop telling me how much you love the troops. It's hypocritical.

Is the lesson I got from it.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

We've been over this already, and I thought you understood.

I understood you quite well Doc. I'm sorry if you think I am "reading emotions" into your posts. You don't like Trump. I get it. He's an "idiot" or an "asshole." Your language suggests your hostility. I'm not reading any emotions into your posts than what is already being shown here.

I'm not a mind reader. I don't read Tarot cards. But it doesn't take Dianna Troi to see you don't like Donald Trump.

I expect people to read my ******* posts, and respond to them as they are.

"He's an idiot" so therefore he's an idiot; "he's an asshole" so therefore he's an asshole. But why? My mode of thinking isn't so "simple" as yours. What emotions and feelings are driving such language? Where you see a finite assertion, I see one made via an emotion. Why is he an "asshole" why is he an "idiot?"

No, I expect people to not read any emotions into my posts.

In this case, how can I not?! You've been calling him names and issuing your slights and predictions, but have not even tried to rebut his positions, stating "he has no positions" or "he doesn't want to be president no more than I do."

It isn't so easy for me not to read emotion into what people say. I am of the thinking that anything that anyone says is driven by a specific emotion. I detected outright hostility from you, directed at Donald Trump. I am truly sorry if this offends you. It is a way of thought I possessed long before I came here.

Well, that's a "way of thought" that you should work on breaking. It's mental masturbation.

You assign emotions to my posts in order to de-legitimize what I'm saying in advance to protect your own views on the subject.

My dislike towards Trump no more indicates that I feel emotionally "worried" about him than your defense of him indicates that you're in love with him.

I think that Trump is an idiot because I grew up in New York and watched him acting like a ******* clown for 30 years, blowing his money on marble bathrooms for his mega-yachts while his companies went bankrupt and their investors went broke.

His entire career is built around being a media clown, not a businessman - the only really profitable business he's ever run is the TV show where he fires people.

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

Perhaps this will help:

Donald Trump on the Issues

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

Perhaps this will help:

Donald Trump on the Issues

I saw that. Most of those are talking points, not "positions". The only firm positions he holds are the standard GOP ones (pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-Obamacare), and all the rest are just empty words and no substance.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

Perhaps this will help:

Donald Trump on the Issues

I saw that. Most of those are talking points, not "positions". The only firm positions he holds are the standard GOP ones (pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-Obamacare), and all the rest are just empty words and no substance.

Well, that's the best I can do.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

Perhaps this will help:

Donald Trump on the Issues

I saw that. Most of those are talking points, not "positions". The only firm positions he holds are the standard GOP ones (pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-Obamacare), and all the rest are just empty words and no substance.

Well, that's the best I can do.

Don't worry, it's not your fault. It's Trump's.

Having an actual nuanced position on any of these issues would hurt him with the supporters he already has more than it would help him gain any new ones.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Tell me what "positions" Donald Trump holds, and I'll respond to them.

Perhaps this will help:

Donald Trump on the Issues

I saw that. Most of those are talking points, not "positions". The only firm positions he holds are the standard GOP ones (pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-Obamacare), and all the rest are just empty words and no substance.

Well, that's the best I can do.

Don't worry, it's not your fault. It's Trump's.

Having an actual nuanced position on any of these issues would hurt him with the supporters he already has more than it would help him gain any new ones.

To be fair, that's essentially true for any candidate at this point.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Reality TV politics, on TV, all day, every day.

 

[Londoner]

mispost - remove

 

[Dot Com]

You Trump supporters are about to become the target of the greatest election rigging apparatus in the history of the world, the GOP is not going to allow him to run as their candidate and that is all there is to it. One day soon there will be rumor so horrible that you people will dump him like a litter box. Who knows? It might even be true.

The powers that be in the GOPoverse will not allow his nomination to proceed, yes.

Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk

 

[IsaacNewton]

Crazies show up for trump and McCain. But McCain actually deserves respect, trump never left the 8th grade mentally and isn't qualified to run for dog catcher.

But you cons keep him going, every time vomit comes out of his mouth a lot of it gets on the Republicans freshly pressed suit.

DON'T STOP.

 

[Toro]

Trump isn't going to be the nominee

You don't know that.

No, I actually do.

Sorry, but No. You don't.

He may not be the nominee, but at the point he has as good or better chance than anyone else in the race.

No he doesn't

0% chance.

Well, OK, 0.1% chance.

 

[Toro]

As a left-winger, Trump's rise in the poll is GREAT NEWS......for 2 reasons:

1. Trump as nominee will make leaving the WH in democrats' hands a virtual certainty.......and

2. Trump as nominee will also make any independent voter FULLY realize that the RNC is populated by mostly morons.

You fools predicted Reagan would lose also

Those fools also predicted that everyone else to whom the phrase "They also predicted Reagan would lose" was applied would lose.

And they pretty much all did.

 

[Claudette]

This is just getting downright hilarious.

http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1170a22016Politics.pdf

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

Donald trump just got first place in a national poll with 24%, and an 11% lead from second place Scott Walker at 13%. We're now a full month and four days from his presidential announcement so this can't just be called off as a post-election bounce. He now has a higher average then Jeb by 2%. I wonder if it's possible he'll pull it off.

Gee. Guess those asked in the polls like what he has to say.

That must piss off all those supporting that asshole Clinton.

Get ready for more Trump threads to deal with his eleven point lead. Can hardly wait. LOL