Trey Gowdy Has Hillary in the Crosshairs.

[toxicmedia]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

 

[WelfareQueen]

The email story broke last week, and nobody has done any polls since then.

Where are you guys hearing that Hillary's approval ratings have gone down?

NY Times did a story and poll two days ago.

 

[Siete]

I really don't care what happens to Hillary/Benghazi/emails ... this country has bigger fish to fry.

 

[WelfareQueen]

I really don't care what happens to Hillary/Benghazi/emails ... this country has bigger fish to fry.

That's nice.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

 

[hazlnut]

So....this is how it will go down with Hillary. Please read representative Gowdy's full statement. This is very illuminating.

Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy releases statement on Secretary Clinton s press conference Gretawire

“Having finally heard from Secretary Clinton about her exclusive use of personal email with which to conduct official business while serving as Secretary of State, regrettably we are left with more questions than answers. For instance, there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, who authorized this exclusive use of personal email despite guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House, who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time—almost two years later—the State Department asked for these public records back, and who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.


“Without access to Secretary Clinton’s personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given State’s delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept State’s or Secretary Clinton’s certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people. That is why I see no choice but for Secretary Clinton to turn her server over to a neutral, detached third-party arbiter who can determine which documents should be public and which should remain private. Secretary Clinton alone created this predicament, but she alone does not get to determine its outcome. These public records at issue are broader than Libya and broader than Benghazi. The Secretary of State has enormous responsibility and jurisdiction and the public, the media and Congress have a legal right to access these public records without impediment.


“Because Secretary Clinton has created more questions than answers, the Select Committee is left with no choice but to call her to appear at least twice. The first appearance will be to clear up her role and resolve issues surrounding her exclusive use of personal email to conduct official business. This is necessary to establish our Committee has a complete record with respect to Secretary Clinton’s time in office. Our committee will then call her to appear before the Committee in a public hearing to answer questions specifically regarding Libya and the Benghazi terrorist attacks that took the lives of our four brave fellow citizens.”

Another GOP nobody trying to make a name for himself.

The Clintons are laughing themselves silly at the thought of this rube trying to take them down.

They GOP was played on this one.

The "scandal" will blow over just in time for the announcement.

 

[toxicmedia]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

The people in that poll who claim to be independents are all conservatives.

For cryin' out loud...Bill O'Reilly claims to be an Independent, and he hasn't voted for a Democrat in probably 20 years, if that

 

[Faun]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

... and Cruz, who's Cuban-Canadian.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

The people in that poll who claim to be independents are all conservatives.

For cryin' out loud...Bill O'Reilly claims to be an Independent, and he hasn't voted for a Democrat in probably 20 years, if that

WTF??? It's the freaking NY Times. Dude....put down the crack pipe.

 

[WelfareQueen]

So....this is how it will go down with Hillary. Please read representative Gowdy's full statement. This is very illuminating.

Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy releases statement on Secretary Clinton s press conference Gretawire

“Having finally heard from Secretary Clinton about her exclusive use of personal email with which to conduct official business while serving as Secretary of State, regrettably we are left with more questions than answers. For instance, there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, who authorized this exclusive use of personal email despite guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House, who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time—almost two years later—the State Department asked for these public records back, and who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.


“Without access to Secretary Clinton’s personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given State’s delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept State’s or Secretary Clinton’s certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people. That is why I see no choice but for Secretary Clinton to turn her server over to a neutral, detached third-party arbiter who can determine which documents should be public and which should remain private. Secretary Clinton alone created this predicament, but she alone does not get to determine its outcome. These public records at issue are broader than Libya and broader than Benghazi. The Secretary of State has enormous responsibility and jurisdiction and the public, the media and Congress have a legal right to access these public records without impediment.


“Because Secretary Clinton has created more questions than answers, the Select Committee is left with no choice but to call her to appear at least twice. The first appearance will be to clear up her role and resolve issues surrounding her exclusive use of personal email to conduct official business. This is necessary to establish our Committee has a complete record with respect to Secretary Clinton’s time in office. Our committee will then call her to appear before the Committee in a public hearing to answer questions specifically regarding Libya and the Benghazi terrorist attacks that took the lives of our four brave fellow citizens.”

Another GOP nobody trying to make a name for himself.

The Clintons are laughing themselves silly at the thought of this rube trying to take them down.

They GOP was played on this one.

The "scandal" will blow over just in time for the announcement.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

So they are going to come out in droves for the old, white, rich, entitled woman because she has a vagina? Hill is going down in flames, even with the news about Ferguson her trouble is no where near over. That leaves you with the crazy eyed fake indian and...well, I guess that's it. You may be ******* done before the green flag drops.

 

[toxicmedia]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

The people in that poll who claim to be independents are all conservatives.

For cryin' out loud...Bill O'Reilly claims to be an Independent, and he hasn't voted for a Democrat in probably 20 years, if that

WTF??? It's the freaking NY Times. Dude....put down the crack pipe.

I'm not talking about the NYT's people. They're at the mercy of what polling respondents say they are.

So of those Independents, probably 1 out of 3 are really Republicans saying they're independent.

It's a ridiculous poll anyway.

Hillary will be the next President, and don't believe what Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O'Reilly say, they all predicted Romney by a landlside

 

[FA_Q2]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

The people in that poll who claim to be independents are all conservatives.

For cryin' out loud...Bill O'Reilly claims to be an Independent, and he hasn't voted for a Democrat in probably 20 years, if that

WTF??? It's the freaking NY Times. Dude....put down the crack pipe.

I'm not talking about the NYT's people. They're at the mercy of what polling respondents say they are.

So of those Independents, probably 1 out of 3 are really Republicans saying they're independent.

It's a ridiculous poll anyway.

Hillary will be the next President, and don't believe what Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O'Reilly say, they all predicted Romney by a landlside

You base that on what?

Nothing at all.

 

[FA_Q2]

So....this is how it will go down with Hillary. Please read representative Gowdy's full statement. This is very illuminating.

Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy releases statement on Secretary Clinton s press conference Gretawire

“Having finally heard from Secretary Clinton about her exclusive use of personal email with which to conduct official business while serving as Secretary of State, regrettably we are left with more questions than answers. For instance, there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, who authorized this exclusive use of personal email despite guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House, who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time—almost two years later—the State Department asked for these public records back, and who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.


“Without access to Secretary Clinton’s personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given State’s delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept State’s or Secretary Clinton’s certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people. That is why I see no choice but for Secretary Clinton to turn her server over to a neutral, detached third-party arbiter who can determine which documents should be public and which should remain private. Secretary Clinton alone created this predicament, but she alone does not get to determine its outcome. These public records at issue are broader than Libya and broader than Benghazi. The Secretary of State has enormous responsibility and jurisdiction and the public, the media and Congress have a legal right to access these public records without impediment.


“Because Secretary Clinton has created more questions than answers, the Select Committee is left with no choice but to call her to appear at least twice. The first appearance will be to clear up her role and resolve issues surrounding her exclusive use of personal email to conduct official business. This is necessary to establish our Committee has a complete record with respect to Secretary Clinton’s time in office. Our committee will then call her to appear before the Committee in a public hearing to answer questions specifically regarding Libya and the Benghazi terrorist attacks that took the lives of our four brave fellow citizens.”

The GOP will have no more luck with the email thing than that impotent hair lipped little church boy Trey Gowdy had with Benghazi.

Here is what they're doing righties...school is in...

People like Chris Mathews and other lefty journalists, like the NYT's that broke the story, have put it out now, so it's old news by the time the 2016 election gets here. It's basic electioneering, and the GOP would have loved to have kept it low till closer to the election, but...

Also, this is probably the only negative thing Hillary has in her closet, and if not we'll hear about it soon being broken by lefty media.

Swing voters, and the people who turned out to reelect Obama, neither care about this, nor will remember it by November 2016. If the GOP brings it up then, it'll be old news drowned out by the white noise of election season

Interesting opinion. Too bad it's wrong. According to the NY Times Hillary's approval ratings have dropped like a stone. Among Independents her approval rating is down to 43%.

Sorry....she cannot win an election when independents do not like or trust her.

You didn't read toxic's post then. They do not trust her TODAY.

In 6 months, none of the 'middle' will care. We have seen this over and over and over again. Why has the concept not sunk in.

So why do you assume they'll trust Hillary more in a few months? Sorry....when trust is lost it is extremely hard to win it back. It requires honesty and integrity. Neither are Hillary strong points.

Because that is exactly what has hepped to virtually every single major player before.

Unless there is something sufficient to sink her entire carrier it simply blows over. It happens every time. This is not large enough to destroy her and will be nothing in 2 months.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

From the NY Times. Notice the low favorability among independents for the Hildabeast. That's death.

Is Hillary Clinton Qualified to Be President A New Poll is Easy to Misread FiveThirtyEight

The people in that poll who claim to be independents are all conservatives.

For cryin' out loud...Bill O'Reilly claims to be an Independent, and he hasn't voted for a Democrat in probably 20 years, if that

WTF??? It's the freaking NY Times. Dude....put down the crack pipe.

I'm not talking about the NYT's people. They're at the mercy of what polling respondents say they are.

So of those Independents, probably 1 out of 3 are really Republicans saying they're independent.

It's a ridiculous poll anyway.

Hillary will be the next President, and don't believe what Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O'Reilly say, they all predicted Romney by a landlside

Wrong. Nobody predicted Romney would win in a landslide. Complete bullshit. Nor did anyone same Obama would win in a landslide.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[toxicmedia]

Alright you guys...there is a lot of denial going on in this thread.

First of all...

Americans don't want to elect another middle aged to older white guy.

They're probably going to elect Hillary becayse she's a woman, and the only Republican candidates so far are older white guys, except for Marco Rubio, who doesn't even act like a Latino.

The people who turned out to elect, and reelect Obama, much to the dismay of the GOP, will turn out to vote for women, minorities, and just about everyone except old white guys.

There weren't enough Confederates to win the civil war, and there ain't enough old white guys for the GOP to keep winning Presidential elections.

Get used to it

So they are going to come out in droves for the old, white, rich, entitled woman because she has a vagina? Hill is going down in flames, even with the news about Ferguson her trouble is no where near over. That leaves you with the crazy eyed fake indian and...well, I guess that's it. You may be ******* done before the green flag drops.

I really hope you're still around after November 2016, so I can give you a bad time.

 

[Jarhead]

I personally think that if the democratic party wants to put in the first woman President, they should look elsewhere. Even if she is elected, I do not see her having a transparent, successful presidency. Sure, I get it. Hillary supporters will tell me how much I am wrong. But the bottom line is this...she is not even president yet and she has a cloud of bipartisan concern surrounding her.

 

[Jarhead]

So....this is how it will go down with Hillary. Please read representative Gowdy's full statement. This is very illuminating.

Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy releases statement on Secretary Clinton s press conference Gretawire

“Having finally heard from Secretary Clinton about her exclusive use of personal email with which to conduct official business while serving as Secretary of State, regrettably we are left with more questions than answers. For instance, there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, who authorized this exclusive use of personal email despite guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House, who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time—almost two years later—the State Department asked for these public records back, and who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.


“Without access to Secretary Clinton’s personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given State’s delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept State’s or Secretary Clinton’s certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people. That is why I see no choice but for Secretary Clinton to turn her server over to a neutral, detached third-party arbiter who can determine which documents should be public and which should remain private. Secretary Clinton alone created this predicament, but she alone does not get to determine its outcome. These public records at issue are broader than Libya and broader than Benghazi. The Secretary of State has enormous responsibility and jurisdiction and the public, the media and Congress have a legal right to access these public records without impediment.


“Because Secretary Clinton has created more questions than answers, the Select Committee is left with no choice but to call her to appear at least twice. The first appearance will be to clear up her role and resolve issues surrounding her exclusive use of personal email to conduct official business. This is necessary to establish our Committee has a complete record with respect to Secretary Clinton’s time in office. Our committee will then call her to appear before the Committee in a public hearing to answer questions specifically regarding Libya and the Benghazi terrorist attacks that took the lives of our four brave fellow citizens.”

The GOP will have no more luck with the email thing than that impotent hair lipped little church boy Trey Gowdy had with Benghazi.

Here is what they're doing righties...school is in...

People like Chris Mathews and other lefty journalists, like the NYT's that broke the story, have put it out now, so it's old news by the time the 2016 election gets here. It's basic electioneering, and the GOP would have loved to have kept it low till closer to the election, but...

Also, this is probably the only negative thing Hillary has in her closet, and if not we'll hear about it soon being broken by lefty media.

Swing voters, and the people who turned out to reelect Obama, neither care about this, nor will remember it by November 2016. If the GOP brings it up then, it'll be old news drowned out by the white noise of election season

Interesting opinion. Too bad it's wrong. According to the NY Times Hillary's approval ratings have dropped like a stone. Among Independents her approval rating is down to 43%.

Sorry....she cannot win an election when independents do not like or trust her.

You didn't read toxic's post then. They do not trust her TODAY.

In 6 months, none of the 'middle' will care. We have seen this over and over and over again. Why has the concept not sunk in.

So why do you assume they'll trust Hillary more in a few months? Sorry....when trust is lost it is extremely hard to win it back. It requires honesty and integrity. Neither are Hillary strong points.

Because that is exactly what has hepped to virtually every single major player before.

Unless there is something sufficient to sink her entire carrier it simply blows over. It happens every time. This is not large enough to destroy her and will be nothing in 2 months.

Actually, I expect the GOP to slow ball it with the situation. They want this to be front page during the tail end of the primaries.

 

[Katzndogz]

Democrat leadership are asking different questions. Can she run a successful campaign and be the subject of two major actions? Trey Gowdy has one. Jason Chaffetz is convening another. These take time and energy. Hillary has neither.