Town falls udner Martial Law for over 10 days for PAROLE VIOLATION

[The2ndAmendment]

Do you understand what "martial law" means?

It's becoming clear that you do not.

There appears to be a lot of things he doesn't understand.

Semantics, ignore the fact that this is totalitarianism and argue the semantics.

It's a police state.
Does that work for you?
A paramilitary anti freedom police state.
California is all democrat.

Blame Bush anyone?

This is what Liberals think should be normal in America.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The police been going after thugs for the past 100 years like this.

Not while pointing 30.06 semi auto rifles in the faces of people who are 'just trying to go home'....
That police officer should be placed on leave with an investigation as to whether he should be disciplined, suspended or terminated.
I don't give a rat's ass WHAT happened. A police officer has NO RIGHT pointing a firearm in the face of an innocent citizen who by the way is the employer of that police officer.
Forearms Do fire accidentally. And if it did, then what.."Gee. I thought I had it on 'safety'."
Meanwhile an innocent citizen is DEAD...
The other issue I have is the 10 day wait to allow people to go home. WTF?..The incident is OVER....Who the hell ordered this siege? They should be fired.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The police most likely asked the people to evacuate their homes to be safe. There was no martial law.

how about an armed to the teeth guy pointing his "assault weapon" to the head of innocent civilian driver?

you do not see it a sa violation?

if they would do it at checkpoints in Iraq - our leftard media would be whining day and night about violations of human rights.

Yet HERE, in the US, militarized police is treating innocent civilians as if they are enemy of the state - and most of you seem to be absolutely OK with that.

Are you, guys, NUTS?

This looks like Russian soldier in Chechnya - but they were at war!

So, you're basing your entire argument around an out-of-context photograph?

Military checkpoints in war zones are significantly more intense than what is shown in that picture. I don't know where you get your information from.

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

 

[Geaux4it]

how about an armed to the teeth guy pointing his "assault weapon" to the head of innocent civilian driver?

you do not see it a sa violation?

if they would do it at checkpoints in Iraq - our leftard media would be whining day and night about violations of human rights.

Yet HERE, in the US, militarized police is treating innocent civilians as if they are enemy of the state - and most of you seem to be absolutely OK with that.

Are you, guys, NUTS?

This looks like Russian soldier in Chechnya - but they were at war!

So, you're basing your entire argument around an out-of-context photograph?

Military checkpoints in war zones are significantly more intense than what is shown in that picture. I don't know where you get your information from.

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

I agree. I would of told him get the fricken bbl out of my face

-Geaux

 

[theDoctorisIn]

how about an armed to the teeth guy pointing his "assault weapon" to the head of innocent civilian driver?

you do not see it a sa violation?

if they would do it at checkpoints in Iraq - our leftard media would be whining day and night about violations of human rights.

Yet HERE, in the US, militarized police is treating innocent civilians as if they are enemy of the state - and most of you seem to be absolutely OK with that.

Are you, guys, NUTS?

This looks like Russian soldier in Chechnya - but they were at war!

So, you're basing your entire argument around an out-of-context photograph?

Military checkpoints in war zones are significantly more intense than what is shown in that picture. I don't know where you get your information from.

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[thereisnospoon]

So, you're basing your entire argument around an out-of-context photograph?

Military checkpoints in war zones are significantly more intense than what is shown in that picture. I don't know where you get your information from.

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

[MENTION=20452]theDoctorisIn[/MENTION]
[MENTION=23165]thereisnospoon[/MENTION]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

[MENTION=20452]theDoctorisIn[/MENTION]
[MENTION=23165]thereisnospoon[/MENTION]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Guns "of this magnitude"? It's not a ******* RPG, it's a rifle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[The2ndAmendment]

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

[MENTION=20452]theDoctorisIn[/MENTION]
[MENTION=23165]thereisnospoon[/MENTION]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Guns "of this magnitude"? It's not a ******* RPG, it's a rifle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So what's your stance on regular citizens owning these types of rifles?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

[MENTION=20452]theDoctorisIn[/MENTION]
[MENTION=23165]thereisnospoon[/MENTION]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Guns "of this magnitude"? It's not a ******* RPG, it's a rifle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So what's your stance on regular citizens owning these types of rifles?

I own more than one.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ernie S.]

Martial Law for any reason! Signs of the times!


Suspect in Northern Calif. standoff surrenders » Knoxville News Sentinel

» AP Photo: Checkpoint Cops Point Guns at Americans? Heads Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

ROSEVILLE, Calif. (AP) — Some residents of a suburban Sacramento city still were waiting to return to their homes 24 hours after a Friday night shootout between law enforcement agents and a wanted parolee left six officers injured.

Roseville police spokesman Lt. Cal Walstad said that one Roseville police officer with a jaw wound and a federal immigration agent shot in the leg remain hospitalized Saturday in serious condition. Four other Roseville officers injured by shrapnel were treated and released.

"Last night our community experienced what can happen in any place when a violent wanted felon is completely committed to not going back to jail," said Roseville Police Chief Daniel Hahn at a news conference Saturday.

Duran was being held on a parole violation, but Hahn said he expected multiple charges of attempted murder would be added.

As officers attempted to capture the suspect before his surrender, helicopters were circling overhead and armored vehicles and other police cars flocked to the area.

At least 15 homes were evacuated, and the area remained a crime scene late Saturday, Walstad said.

Law enforcement officers had been looking for Duran in the area for at least 10 days before finding him on Friday,

They had been looking for him, but I see nothing of Martial law.

 

[Ernie S.]

Out of context?
Ok, I will quantify my remarks. This is not martial law.
With that cleared up....Let us move forward..
The photo shows....A man in a car. A police officer with what appears to be a high powered possibly semi-automatic rifle. That officer is pointing the rifle directly in the face of an innocent citizen.
My concern is the rifle pointing in and of itself....IMO This officer is derelict in his duty.

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

There is no such thing as an accidental discharge. The officer's trigger finger is well away from the trigger. That gun WILL NOT FIRE.

 

[thereisnospoon]

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

[MENTION=20452]theDoctorisIn[/MENTION]
[MENTION=23165]thereisnospoon[/MENTION]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Are you ******* kidding?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Are you ******* kidding?

No.

Now answer.

 

[Politico]

Exactly who was under Martial Law for ten days?

Read the article, the entire suburb was under martial law.

Oh wait, you Libtards desire this for America

No they weren't. And i dunno wtf that picture is. But it is obviously not what it appears to be.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

No they weren't. And i dunno wtf that picture is. But it is obviously not what it appears to be.

Are you claiming the AP made a false caption and forged the photo?

 

[Politico]

Everyone knows what Alex Jones is. And the AP is just a news forwarding service. This thread however is yours.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

the AP is just a news forwarding service.

Are you claiming that the AP forged this photograph and falsified the caption?

 

[thereisnospoon]

What makes either of you think that police should even deploy weapons of this magnitude on US soil?

Are you ******* kidding?

No.

Now answer.

I asked if you were kidding because the question is not a question, but a statement with a question mark after it...
What is it you wish to know?

 

[thereisnospoon]

I agree that if that police officer was actually pointing his gun at that man without any cause, it would be a big deal. But it's not clear from this picture if that is the case.

The body language of the two police officers and the driver don't seem to match a stressful situation, which makes me think the gun might not actually be pointing at them, but off to the side. It's nearly impossible to tell without seeing from a different angle.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

My problem is had there been an accidental discharge of the rifle, the story would have taken on an entirely different tact.
The officer was not handling the rifle properly.

There is no such thing as an accidental discharge. The officer's trigger finger is well away from the trigger. That gun WILL NOT FIRE.

Bullshit....I have seen it happen. Any piece of equipment with moving parts is subject to malfunction