I never stated how many times each one was waterboarded, other than one was waterboarded twice.
This is false. From your first post in the thread:
This is the CIA criteria for waterboarding, which was done only 3 times.
When I called you on it, you continued to claim that there was no proof they'd been waterboarded more than three times and I didn't have proof they were waterboarded 83 and 183 times and that my source didn't say anything about it when it so clearly did.
Please now, don't backpedal. Admit that you've been caught in a lie or an honest mistake, and admit the error. You said it was three times, you were wrong. No biggie, but don't go spouting it anymore now that it's been proven for a fact not to be true.
It wasn't used three times, it was used at least 266 times. Now you know.
You are using the CIA memo to supposedly prove your case.
However, the same CIA memo says explicitly that because of the waterboarding the 3 arch terrorists, who were previously uncooperative, gave information that led to:
1) The thwarting of a plane into a LA building
and
2) The stopping of a plot to build and donate a "dirty bomb" in Washington, D.C.
How do you reconcile that?
The memo is a CYA document designed for CYA purposes. Beyond that, the person who wrote it very likely had no idea the Library Tower bombing KSM talked about was already something the CIA knew about and had already captured the ringleader and thwarted the plot. The CIA, like any government bureaucracy, is not monolithic but contains many moving parts and often the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing.