Top Intelligence Officials Contradicted Brennan: ‘No Intelligence’ To Support Key Russia Hoax Claim

Billiejeens

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
52,502
Reaction score
38,573
Points
3,545

Brennan ignored objections: ‘The assessment will stay the same.’​


Top officials working on an intelligence community analysis about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election were overruled by CIA Director John Brennan, according to records exclusively reviewed by The Federalist. The records are related to ongoing criminal investigations into Brennan and other top intelligence officials for their roles in launching the Russia collusion hoax.

The dispute was over the “key judgment” in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”


BJ-
As much as I believe that Brennan should hang for any convictions associated with his crimes -this directive came directly from Obama.
 
The declassified report showed documentation outlining how, in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community assessed that Russia was "probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means" but changed its tune after Trump was elected.

The report showed that on Dec. 9, 2016, Obama's White House called in several top National Security Council principals, including DNI James Clapper, to discuss Russia.

Clapper's executive assistant then sent an email to intelligence community leaders to task them to create a new assessment "per the President's request" to detail "the tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election."

Gabbard further alleged that Obama officials leaked false statements to The Washington Post claiming that "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."
 

Brennan ignored objections: ‘The assessment will stay the same.’​


Top officials working on an intelligence community analysis about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election were overruled by CIA Director John Brennan, according to records exclusively reviewed by The Federalist. The records are related to ongoing criminal investigations into Brennan and other top intelligence officials for their roles in launching the Russia collusion hoax.

The dispute was over the “key judgment” in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”


BJ-
As much as I believe that Brennan should hang for any convictions associated with his crimes -this directive came directly from Obama.
You guys are latching onto this like babies with a pacifier

It's all made up crap.
 
Docs are out.

The way that the FBI characterized Hillary's physical and mental condition and how much the Russians knew, will illustrate why they wanted her to be President.
 
Also-

The Department of Justice just confirmed that President Obama ordered the FBI to shut down the Clinton email scandal.

FBI Director James Comey followed orders and buried it. This was a clear, high-level criminal cover-up worse than Watergate.

The declassified DOJ Report exposes:- The FBI got hacked U.S. data from a source but never fully reviewed key drives.- The data showed Obama’s emails and State Department info were compromised.- Obama used Loretta Lynch to pressure Comey and avoid a Clinton-related scandal.-

Obama approved using federal power to blunt the Clinton investigations.- Comey decided to exonerated Clinton before key interviews were done.-

Evidence suggests Lynch tried to influence the probe or leaked info to Clinton’s team.-

The FBI drafted a memo to access the drives but access was killed by Obama

The facts are now out. Accountability must be next.
 
You guys are latching onto this like babies with a pacifier

It's all made up crap.

It was all made up
Straight from The Steele Dossier.

These docs show the inner workings of a totally corrupt Obama Administration.

Fact is---------->all of these Docs WERE from the Obysmal Administration, and were kept under CLASSIFIED MATERIAL. Leftists can NOT claim it is all made up, unless they tell us the Obama Administration were the people that did it! So either--------->

1. Obama and friends covered it all up.............or 2. Obama and friends lied about themselves so they could look bad!

Take your choice Leftists!

As far as Obama being prosecuted; NOT going to happen. But, they WILL prosecute the easiest big dog in the Obama pound to get, and whomever that is will have a wonderful story to tell, don't ya think! I predict it will be a man prosecuted, and not a woman; but the big dog women with kids/grandkids not named Hilly, will testify to get immunity. Oh, this is going to be fun!
 
Fact is---------->all of these Docs WERE from the Obysmal Administration, and were kept under CLASSIFIED MATERIAL. Leftists can NOT claim it is all made up, unless they tell us the Obama Administration were the people that did it! So either--------->

1. Obama and friends covered it all up.............or 2. Obama and friends lied about themselves so they could look bad!

Take your choice Leftists!

As far as Obama being prosecuted; NOT going to happen. But, they WILL prosecute the easiest big dog in the Obama pound to get, and whomever that is will have a wonderful story to tell, don't ya think! I predict it will be a man prosecuted, and not a woman; but the big dog women with kids/grandkids not named Hilly, will testify to get immunity. Oh, this is going to be fun!

(1) It appears that the lunatic left members are all huddling up somewhere, prior to responding.
(2) Obama reminded us yesterday how bad a speaker he is - off prompter -
 

Brennan ignored objections: ‘The assessment will stay the same.’​


Top officials working on an intelligence community analysis about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election were overruled by CIA Director John Brennan, according to records exclusively reviewed by The Federalist. The records are related to ongoing criminal investigations into Brennan and other top intelligence officials for their roles in launching the Russia collusion hoax.

The dispute was over the “key judgment” in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”


BJ-
As much as I believe that Brennan should hang for any convictions associated with his crimes -this directive came directly from Obama.
Marco disagrees. Now what about those Epstein tapes.
 
You guys are latching onto this like babies with a pacifier

It's all made up crap.
Where is your evidence or any source that says it is 'all made up'? You may believe in your heart it isn't true, but given the evidence that is now coming out, you have little or nothing at this point to go on other than you don't want to believe it.
 
Marco disagrees. Now what about those Epstein tapes.

You have shown no ability or willingness to understand this fact, but -

All based on the Russia Hoax.

I understand that the truth is an option for you, it shouldn't be.
 
Where is your evidence or any source that says it is 'all made up'? You may believe in your heart it isn't true, but given the evidence that is now coming out, you have little or nothing at this point to go on other than you don't want to believe it.
Use your head for something besides holding up that stupid red hat.

Where was all of this in the first tRump *administration?

Why is this suddenly appear when tRump is desperate for a distraction?

You and I both know this is just that, a distraction, to keep your mind off the Epstein files.

The facts are here:


You won't read it though.
 
15th post
Use your head for something besides holding up that stupid red hat.

Where was all of this in the first tRump *administration?

Why is this suddenly appear when tRump is desperate for a distraction?

You and I both know this is just that, a distraction, to keep your mind off the Epstein files.

The facts are here:


You won't read it though.

Politifact
Every bit as credible as a note from "Epstein's Mom"

(no not that Epstein)
 
The Senate decided that there was Russian Interference, based on the Hoax that the Obama Admin put out.

No chance on the focus part.
Yes. it will be interesting to know what Marco Rubio, for instance, acting chair on that Senate intelligence committee investigation in 2020 that concluded there was extensive Russian inference, thinks about this new information coming out.

Alas, despite President Trump's typical hyperbole on this, short of charging and convicting the culprits with treason that I don't think will happen, nothing will likely come of it as the statute of limitations have run out charging them on the original wrong doing.

But the declassified information sent by Gabbard to the DOJ does appear to be really incriminating:

 
Reports in 2016 that Russian President Vladimir Putin backed Donald Trump in that year's presidential election were bogus, according to documents released Wednesday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Gabbard told Newsmax on Tuesday that more documents directly refuting a statement issued earlier in the day by former President Barack Obama's camp denying his role in an alleged coup attempt against Trump would be released.

The latest documents — a declassified report prepared by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence back in 2020 — show Putin believed then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 presidential election. The Russian president's team launched cyberattacks and leaked emails that focused on weakening Clinton's future administration.

Putin even "held back leaking some compromising material to use against the expected Clinton administration after they took office," the documents show.

The claim that Putin preferred Trump and tried to help him win did not meet professional Intelligence Community standards, according to the documents. The claim was based on "one scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence" from a flawed report.

That single line became the only classified evidence cited to support the Trump-preference claim.

"The ICA [Intelligence Community Assessment] misrepresented these reports as reliable, without mentioning their significant underlying flaws," said the report, adding the CIA also ignored or selectively quoted better-quality intelligence that contradicted that claim.

Gabbard is expected to attend a Wednesday afternoon White House press briefing.
 
Yes. it will be interesting to know what Marco Rubio, for instance, acting chair on that Senate intelligence committee investigation in 2020 that concluded there was extensive Russian inference, thinks about this new information coming out.

Alas, despite President Trump's typical hyperbole on this, short of charging and convicting the culprits with treason that I don't think will happen, nothing will likely come of it as the statute of limitations have run out charging them on the original wrong doing.
But the declassified information sent by Gabbard to the DOJ does appear to be really incriminating:


It is an ongoing Grand Conspiracy -

The clock is still ticking - There is no statue to run out.

(you haven't seen the most damaging stuff, yet)
 
Back
Top Bottom