Top 10 Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence

[cnm]

The age old question of why bad things happen to good people has but two answers. Either God does not exist or God does not care.

I disagree with that but it is not a scientific disagreement. Scientifically I can not prove either answer wrong.

Yes. The options that god is evil and/or intends those bad things to happen are omitted. Too, that those supposed good people are not really good: god, like the Shadow, knowing...

 

[occupied]

Yes. The options that god is evil and/or intends those bad things to happen are omitted.

If God is somehow different than how he is commonly presented ( all good, all caring, omnipotent. omnipresent) then the bible is wrong. If the bible is wrong on the nature of God then it's wrong about everything.

 

[occupied]

What do you know about God and Science?
You are nothing in Universe, even a smallest galactic atom is billions parsecs larger as you.
What can you explain here, what do you know?
Nothing

If God exists even he must obey the laws of physics.

 

[pknopp]

If God exists even he must obey the laws of physics.

Not really. If God exists he could see to the feeding of a multitude with a few fish but the laws of physics do not work there.

 

[occupied]

Not really. If God exists he could see to the feeding of a multitude with a few fish but the laws of physics do not work there.

An omnipotent God would not trap himself within a universe where magic is impossible.

 

[pknopp]

An omnipotent God would not trap himself within a universe where magic is impossible.

I do not know that it is.

 

[Votto]

Proof that the Bible is true is much easier

If only man wrote it:

What man would make fornication and adultery and getting drunk a sin?

What woman would make gossiping a sin or put a man in charge of a family over themselves?

And what kid would put, "Children obey your parents"?

Makes no sense. Must be supernatural.

Unless.......................

That's it!

My pouch must have written it

Never trusted him ever since he started wearing that satanic garb.

 

[occupied]

I do not know that it is.

Sure you do. The supernatural has been studied and tested since the moment science became a thing. All of the great classical astronomers were also astrologers, Issac Newton studied alchemy as hard as anything else he worked on. A million others have prodded and poked at everything spiritual and found nothing but entropy.

 

[alang1216]

Many atheists want to have proofs of God's existence.

Let's say you are correct and our universe had a creator. Is there any way to connect that creator to the God of the Bible?

 

[pknopp]

Sure you do. The supernatural has been studied and tested since the moment science became a thing. All of the great classical astronomers were also astrologers, Issac Newton studied alchemy as hard as anything else he worked on. A million others have prodded and poked at everything spiritual and found nothing but entropy.

There are many things that have happened that can not be explained by science. That doesn't mean there isn't a scientific explanation but it also doesn't mean there is.

One way or the other I respect those who say "I don't know", when we do not know in a provable way.

 

[Hollie]

These “scientific pwoof of the gods” threads come along all the time. They all seem to open with long cut and paste paragraphs from creationer websites or someone’s personal blog.

They go on for pages with no “scientific pwoof”, just like this thread.

 

[occupied]

There are many things that have happened that can not be explained by science. That doesn't mean there isn't a scientific explanation but it also doesn't mean there is.

One way or the other I respect those who say "I don't know", when we do not know in a provable way.

I totally never mock people for their faith. It can be crucial to the psychological well-being of those who cannot deal with the seeming finality of death. I make a slight exception when someone tries to use science to somehow validate their belief. That's mocking my faith.

 

[cnm]

If God is somehow different than how he is commonly presented ( all good, all caring, omnipotent. omnipresent) then the bible is wrong.

I don't believe I've ever seen that picture presented in the bible but I admit I've only skimmed it when attending weddings and funerals.
The vengeful, capricious god which takes revenge for events supposedly within its control is the one I recognise.

 

[pknopp]

I totally never mock people for their faith. It can be crucial to the psychological well-being of those who cannot deal with the seeming finality of death. I make a slight exception when someone tries to use science to somehow validate their belief. That's mocking my faith.

Sure.

 

[Votto]

Crushing

 

[occupied]

Crushing

The true origin of life is still an open question. It's probably unanswerable short of a time machine. We can envision several science fiction scenarios that in no way require a departure from the known laws of the universe.

 

[norwegen]

Many atheists want to have proofs of God's existence.
In my opinion the information from below is one of the bests in internet
Also, guys, read, think about and ask God for forgiveness of your sins
And begin to read the Holy Bible

Gods Existence-
I often get the “Prove to me God exists” question, usually from people who really do not desire any answers. However, there is occasionally a few who really want to know…This info is based upon about 6 hours of condensed note taking…Hopefully it will be instrumental in your ministry as well…
Technically, “Proof” (like a picture or video tape) is non-existent any more than I can technically “prove” that Washington was president…There are writings that can be cited that will support his presidency and are accepted as fact but technically I believe that Washington was president because I have read the accounts and writings of those present in that day who have documented the history and I believe what has been presented to me as fact. It is a given however, that History is MUCH different than Science.
I have had many of the same questions myself that people ask me concerning science and God. I am an analytical person and am not satisfied with only someone else’s experience and faith as a basis for my own beliefs. I believe that there is nothing wrong with faith, but blind faith without logical analysis or deductive reasoning can be very dangerous and even naïve in some circumstances. I have studied extensively on the subject of God’s existence and actually have a lot of material to reference (books, audio series, notes, etc)…Some of which is so deep that I don’t really understand it completely myself with examples dealing with Quantum Physics and such…but in my studies I have never been diligent enough to write down or organize my notes…Until now…
I do not take credit for any of this material, most all of it is taken from my notes and personal recollection of information that I have listened to and read from several sources…Some of the commentary is mine, but nearly all of the information in this outline comes from an audio series titled Top Ten Proofs by a Detroit radio host named Bob Dutko. If you are interested in owning the audio CD teachings on this subject, they can be purchased at this web-site (www.toptenproofs.com). There are several other topics of study that he addresses in this series but much of the “info” below comes from his audio CD titled top 10 proofs of God’s Existence.
I wrote this info in outline form in an attempt to shorten it and still relay the content. The content is almost completely referencing scientific justifications for God’s existence and not simply “faith based” revelation.
I believe, in order to establish any “faith” in God, there must first be an understanding of TRUTH that there IS A GOD…If a person has never had an “experience” justifying that “truth” then, for many, there must be legitimate scientific evidence presented in order for faith to have a foundation on which to build…Hopefully, this outline will be a basis for that.
So I start with the most simple of scientific questions:
What is science?
Science, by definition, is formulating a hypothesis or theory based upon observation, testing or the ability to make predictions.
I am convinced that a belief in God is, IN FACT, Scientific and that science DOES back up and prove that there is a God…Here are some of my reasoning’s for that belief system
1. The Scientific law –The First Law of Thermodynamics…
a. Scientific conservation of energy law which states that in the universe we have matter and energy and that matter or energy can be converted into each other but cannot be created from nothing. This law also states that matter or energy cannot be destroyed to the point where it ceases to exist, it can only take on different forms…
b. Now consider the entire universe and all of the matter and energy in it…if there is NO GOD…then Scientifically, the universe cannot exist…otherwise it would be a violation of the first law of thermodynamics because science states that “something” in our universe and within the laws of science cannot come from “nothing”…This is the FIRST law of thermodynamics and all scientific law about matter and energy are based upon this first laws foundation.
c. The Big Bang theory does not support this law. Science has proven that the universe is expanding and theorize that everything came from a small “dot” of compressed matter which exploded into what is now our expanding universe…The reason that they teach this theory and the fact that the universe came from the explosion of this compressed “Dot” is because of the first law of thermodynamics…without that compressed dot, the first law of thermodynamics collapses. But still, that theory is self defeating because the compressed “dot” that held the universe and exploded, still contradicts The First Law of Thermodynamics, because matter, regardless of how small or compact, according to scientific law, cannot come from nothing…
2. The Second Law of Thermodynamics-
a. Scientific Heat law- which states that everything will move toward a state of equilibrium. For instance, take a cup of hot coffee and a cup of ice and set them together on the same table…Assuming there are no outside influences (which is called a “closed system” in science and scientists who do not believe in God’s existence or influence would concur that the universe is a closed system), over time, both will equalize to the same temperature and reach a state of heat equilibrium.
b. Also within the Second Law of Thermodynamics is a principle that states that things move from order to chaos, degrade, become sloppier and ultimately move toward a state of entropy. A simple example of this is, if you were to have a stack of papers on your desk at work, as people walk by, and the wind blows, over time your desk will become messier as the papers slowly move from a state of order to mess, they will NEVER become straighter or neater over time as this would become a violation of the law of entropy within the second law of thermodynamics…with this law understood scientifically, if there were no God, and the universe is a closed system with no outside influence, when the “big bang” took place 15 billion years ago, the universe could not have gone from an explosion to order…this argument violates scientific law…Explosions cannot turn into order scientifically.
i. Considering these first 2 laws, occasionally scientists who believe in a closed system will argue under the first law of thermodynamics that perhaps all the matter in the universe always existed…However, the second law of thermodynamics invalidates that theory because if everything in the universe always existed, we would no longer have disparity of heat in the universe. Over the course of “forever” we would have achieved heat death and everything in the universe would be the same temperature based upon the second law of thermodynamics…But as we know, that is not the case in the universe…there are stars that burn at different temperatures and galaxies with varying heats depending upon their distance from their star. We also see comets which are balls of icy matter existing in the same universe …which are the equivalent of the hot coffee and ice cups on the same table…so they could not have been here forever because the second law of thermodynamics disproves that within a closed system without having reached a place of equilibrium by now not to mention the fact that the universe could not have reached this level of complexity from an explosion based upon the law of entropy within the second law of thermodynamics…
3. Based upon scientific law, “Life cannot come from Non-life”
a. This is called A-biogenesis and is unscientific.
i. Science, by definition, is formulating a hypothesis or theory based upon observation, testing or the ability to make predictions.
1. Discredit 1- Science is a hypothesis based upon observation- has anyone ever observed life coming into existence from non-life? The answer is no, it has never been observed in any laboratory in history.
2. Discredit 2- Is there any test that can be done that will produce life from non-life? The answer again is No.
3. Discredit 3- Is there any predictions that can be made that will produce life from non-life…Again, No…so based upon scientific law A-biogenesis is an unscientific hypothesis.
b. With this said, based upon the definition of science, the scientists who hold strongly to the belief that Life came from Non-life (a-biogenesis) are not being “scientific’ at all in their assessment of what they say they believe. But what seems even more controversial, is that they then accuse Christian beliefs of being unscientific.
c. Because life has NEVER came into being from non-life scientifically, believing that there is a God is in fact scientific because we know scientifically that the laws of science will not allow life to come from non-life. So it is a scientific conclusion that there must be a “being” capable of creating life from non-life.

.................................
...............................

You can continue to read here:

Top 10 Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence

tattoopreacher.com

Do all scientists agree that the universe is a closed system?

Might it have emerged from a singularity?

 

[mamooth]

As I said please to provide serious proves, not babbling, cursing and hate to God

As I offered no hate or cursing against God, you are clearly lying. That's not debatable by any honest person.

I won't try to explain why you lied, because I can't be sure. Instead, I'll just ask you. Why did you choose to lie?

Remember, Satan is the Lord of Lies, and you're doing his bidding again. It's only your eternal soul at stake here, no biggee.

 

[mamooth]

If God exists even he must obey the laws of physics.

I'd disagree. It's conceivable a god could not be bound like that.

However, if a god is not bound by the laws of physics and logic, it becomes completely unknowable. If this god says "worship me", it might actually mean "devour your neighbor" or "bite the wax tadpole", because causality and logic no longer hold. The god turns into Cthulhu.

So, the theists have a choice between a god that's unknowable, or a god that _is_ bound by logic and causality.

If it is bound by logic, then you have the contradiction between omniscience and free will, and the contradiction between omnibenevolence and The Problem of Evil.

The Jews were smart, and got around that by not assigning omni-traits to God.

 

[Baron]

Yes. The options that god is evil and/or intends those bad things to happen are omitted. Too, that those supposed good people are not really good: god, like the Shadow, knowing...

Question: why

If God exists even he must obey the laws of physics.

God is the Creator of anything including laws of physics.