Tom Homan Puts to Sleep the Media's "Fifty Thousand Dollar Bribe" Conspiracy Theory

[postman]

For cash donations.....

It's like showing somebody a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge, saying it's for sale.

And when he pays you for the bridge, you congratulate him for buying the picture.

 

[Delldude]

It's like showing somebody a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge, saying it's for sale.

And when he pays you for the bridge, you congratulate him for buying the picture.

The illusion was highly profitable.

 

[Orangecat]

Prove he’s not by releasing the files like you promised last year. You lied. That’s my proof

That’s not proof, dumbo.

 

[Orangecat]

There is FBI video of him taking $50K from somebody.

Is it video or audio? I keep hearing conflicting speculation.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

That’s not proof, dumbo.

.

It's hilarious what they think is actually proof.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

There is FBI video of him taking $50K from somebody.

.

So, where is it?




.

 

[Meister]

So he says "nuh-uh" and you call that "put to bed"?

You do know criminals regularly claim to be innocent, right?

So, your proof is..........?

Holman says he didn't take any cash, the proof is on you and your ilk.

 

[Rawley]

So he says "nuh-uh" and you call that "put to bed"?

You do know criminals regularly claim to be innocent, right?

Hey, your cult is the one making the claim. Put up, or shut up.

 

[Delldude]

Oh no..... Snopes?

We were unable to attach a rating to the claim that Homan accepted a $50,000 bribe because we were not able to obtain a firsthand source for the information. Additionally, we could not confirm much information about the investigation into Homan because the reporting that broke the story relied on anonymous sources. We reached out to the FBI for comment on the investigation but had not heard back at time of publication.

The outcome

Trump critics painted the claim that Homan had accepted $50,000 as him taking a bribe and suggested that the administration had ordered the investigation into Homan closed.

News outlets reported that the case might not be so clear-cut.

Breaking down allegation Tom Homan accepted $50K bribe from undercover FBI agents

The FBI closed the case after U.S. President Donald Trump took office, according to several reliable news outlets.

www.snopes.com

 

[postman]

The illusion was highly profitable.

Just ask David Copperfield

 

[postman]

So, your proof is..........?

Holman says he didn't take any cash, the proof is on you and your ilk.

Actually Holman didn't deny taking the cash. He instead said he didn't do anything wrong.

 

[Orangecat]

“I got the quote,” Doocy said. “[Anchor] John Roberts said, the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein clients. Will that really happen?’ And [Bondi] said, ‘It’s sitting right now on my desk to review.”

Logic dictates that if it hasn’t yet been reviewed, it can’t be said to exist as a list of clients. Rational adults can extrapolate that a lot of information exists, not literally on her desk, that has yet to be sifted through and categorized.

 

[Delldude]

Just ask David Copperfield

Or the IRS whistleblowers......

 

[Zincwarrior]

.

So, where is it?




.

Ask Bondi and Patel.

 

[Delldude]

Ask Bondi and Patel.

Or the unsupported claims by anonymous sources and lack of evidence.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Ask Bondi and Patel.

.

You're the one who said it. I'm asking you.

Just say you can't prove what you said.





.

 

[Meister]

Actually Holman didn't deny taking the cash. He instead said he didn't do anything wrong.

Ummmm, could you connect those two dots for us?

Because, it sounds like, if Holman DID in fact, take the money....he would have done something wrong.
Is English your second language?
asking for a friend

 

[marvin martian]

Ask Bondi and Patel.

No need. It doesn't exist, hence your inability to produce it.

Your media knows you're too dumb to question it, so they ran with it.

Works every time on stupid people like you.

 

[sealybobo]

Prove that Mike Johson is protecting Trump for being a pedo, and not protecting the names of innocent and innocent-until-proven-guilty people in the files?

What?

No proof, you're just guessing?

If we're just guessing, I'll go with my guesses, not yours.

Sometimes you don't need to prove a lie when you see it you just know

House speaker said Republicans are seeking 'maximum transparency' on Epstein case​

Johnson repeated his contention that the GOP was working “around the clock” to see justice served while protecting Epstein’s victims.

The Epstein files — a trove of documents related to the government’s investigation of the late financier and convicted pedophile — have proven a potent political issue after Trump administration officials walked back plans to make them public. Democrats have seized on the about-face, claiming that the move was evidence that the documents implicated Trump, who had a relationship with Epstein in the 1990s.

This is the part that makes me laugh the most

Johnson complained that Democrats had not clamored for the release of Epstein files during the Joe Biden administration, and that they now “feign outrage” over the documents because they believe their release would be damaging to Trump and Republicans. Very true. It's also true that back then Republicans clamored for the release of the files and feigned outrage because they believed the release would be damaging to Democrats.

 

[Crepitus]

So, your proof is..........?

Holman says he didn't take any cash, the proof is on you and your ilk.

The DOJ is likely suppressing it.