- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,979
- 2,040
People segregate themselves because it is comfortable. They want to live around people who generally look like them, like the same kind of food, speak the same language, understand the same jokes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People segregate themselves because it is comfortable. They want to live around people who generally look like them, like the same kind of food, speak the same language, understand the same jokes.
This thread is not about Government enforced segregation, because that's the closet thing to genocide without killing the oppressed population
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sure that many of you notice that different cultural groups tend to segregate themselves.
At a white wedding, most people are white.
At a black wedding, most people are black.
At an Indian wedding, most people are Indian.
It seems that even in the most diverse areas, people naturally segregate themselves.
There are mountains of evidence that show that violence and tensions arise between cultures that are living within each other. In other words, multiculturalism naturally breeds violence, because one group always attempts to dominate the other, and often succeeds.
There are also mountains of evidence to show that communities sharing the same race and religion and language, are are for the most part culturally homogenous, have a lot less violence and tensions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted in the disclaimer above, there are a lot of fascists that embrace this view, but attempt to enforce it through the machine of government, usually to the point of genocide.
But, does that mean the foundation of their view is flawed?
Why do people naturally segregate themselves?
Why do homogenous cultures experience more peace and prosperity?
This thread is not about Government enforced segregation, because that's the closet thing to genocide without killing the oppressed population
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sure that many of you notice that different cultural groups tend to segregate themselves.
At a white wedding, most people are white.
At a black wedding, most people are black.
At an Indian wedding, most people are Indian.
It seems that even in the most diverse areas, people naturally segregate themselves.
There are mountains of evidence that show that violence and tensions arise between cultures that are living within each other. In other words, multiculturalism naturally breeds violence, because one group always attempts to dominate the other, and often succeeds.
There are also mountains of evidence to show that communities sharing the same race and religion and language, are are for the most part culturally homogenous, have a lot less violence and tensions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted in the disclaimer above, there are a lot of fascists that embrace this view, but attempt to enforce it through the machine of government, usually to the point of genocide.
But, does that mean the foundation of their view is flawed?
Why do people naturally segregate themselves?
Why do homogenous cultures experience more peace and prosperity?
One of my daughter's friends married a Mexican. I kept the grandbaby while she went to the wedding. She said it was about half and half white and Hispanic. The music alternated every other song between American and Mexican music. She said that when the Mexicans danced the Americans sat, and vice versa. It sounded kind of comical, actually.
Um, cannibalism has never been naturalBecause it's natural
So is cannibalism, but we don't practice that anymore either.
You weirdo
Because it's natural
So is cannibalism, but we don't practice that anymore either.
Um, cannibalism has never been natural
You weirdo
It says that gene is only found in black AfricansSo is cannibalism, but we don't practice that anymore either.
Um, cannibalism has never been natural
You weirdo
Go read the relevant biology literature. Humans have gene expressions that are specifically relevant for eating human flesh. Those wouldn't be necessary unless... they were eating human flesh.
So is cannibalism, but we don't practice that anymore either.
Um, cannibalism has never been natural
You weirdo
Go read the relevant biology literature. Humans have gene expressions that are specifically relevant for eating human flesh. Those wouldn't be necessary unless... they were eating human flesh.
Um, cannibalism has never been natural
You weirdo
Go read the relevant biology literature. Humans have gene expressions that are specifically relevant for eating human flesh. Those wouldn't be necessary unless... they were eating human flesh.
Expound?
The Cannibal Within offers an evolutionary account of the propensity of human beings, in extreme circumstances to eat other human beings, despite the strong Western taboo against such practices. What sets this volume apart from the large body of literature on cannibalism, both popular and anthropological, is the underlying premise: cannibalism as an alternative to starvation is tacitly condoned by the same biological morality that would condemn cannibalism of other sorts in non-threatening situations. Deep as the taboos may be, the survival instinct runs even deeper.