Again, you make accusations, then you need to back it up, I am not going to let you make up crap without calling you out. I don’t use PM, grow up and deal with it. If you can’t tell me in the open, then you don’t need to say it at all. Got it, good.
...Moving right along. I’d support Sanders over Trump. The GOP needs to either listen to their constituents or they will lose control in the House or the Senate in 2019. The GOP was lucky the Democrats ran Clinton, any other candidate would have beat Trump.
I already have proven the point. Any jackass with an IQ the size of their shoe can read this thread and see you are nothing more than a childish troll that likes to piss people off but is too chickenshit to call them out in PM and face them.
You are a keyboard commando that has a big ego and damn little for brains. Can I prove it? You bet. You want to grandstand and call people names; you like to make idiotic allegations; you want all the political jockeying to be public. You like to engage in what, if done in face to face encounters, is called "
fighting words" where I come from.
"
A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct when such person commits any of the following:
...Without provocation, uses to or of another person in such other person's presence, opprobrious or abusive words which by their very utterance tend to incite to an immediate breach of the peace, that is to say, words which as a matter of common knowledge and under ordinary circumstances will, when used to or of another person in such other person's presence, naturally tend to provoke violent resentment, that is, words commonly called "fighting words"...
2010 Georgia Code :: TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES :: CHAPTER 11 - OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY :: ARTICLE 2 - OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER :: § 16-11-39 - Disorderly conduct
YOU were the one who began engaging me with words that would rise to such a level. Yet, you basically called me out and when I told you to take it to PM where you could tell me to name the time and the place, your spineless, gutless ass backed down. You like that you can pretend to be an Internet tough guy; you like that that you can do what amounts to criminal activity anonymously, but never get called on it.
You're a ******* bully that don't have any brains, no guts, and no scruples. So, if you want to reply to this and keep this going, I'll simply cut and paste this portion of my response. You and I have nothing left to talk about. Badgering me over personal crap is a violation of the TOS as you like to yap about. Let me quote them for you:
"
You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws."
Your specific threat in your
recent post is:
"I am not going to let you make up crap without calling you out."
Okay. You've called me out. You got your response. It's time to put up or STFU. If you want to take it further, go to PM. I'm not engaging in pissing matches in order to post here. That is my word to you.
AND BACK TO THE SUBJECT AT HAND
It's a sad commentary that the general public has this great tool by which we could have productive discussions and bounce ideas off each other, maybe coming up with a solution to the political issues that plague us, but we don't do that.
Thomas Jefferson stated:
“
A wise and frugal government… shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”
First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801
The reality is that today we have excessively high taxes, poverty level wages, a deficit that cannot realistically be paid off and all the current economic theories remain just that: theory. I say we experiment so as not to bankrupt the country and see what works and if it is a combination wherein the employer gets to decide whether they want to hire whomever they choose and pay what they want and pay the higher taxes OR pay above poverty level, hire an all American staff and pay much lower taxes, go with it.
You failed to prove it, got it. Thanks for the info.
I say you hire an all American staff, that is a good solution my issue is giving company a tax break to do the right thing. I’m for imposing a penalty for a company that doesn’t hire 100% American, it’s penalty for doing the wrong thing.
You must have OCD.
Yes, your dumbass inquiries have been addressed over and over and over again.You've been exposed for what you are.
You're welcome for the information.
Since you also cannot understand that an employer owns the job he / she creates, you don't understand the concept of
private property, you are spewing socialist ideology here.
Then don’t reward them for hiring all Americans. That is government dictating morality just as much penalizing them. So, both are a form of socialism. I’m against government doling out money to corporations.
I told you before I am against corporate welfare, it is a way the government picks winner and losers. As far as businesses hiring who they want I’m all for it. I just don’t think they should be rewarded for doing it. If you think you need to incentivize businesses on hiring all Americans then penalize businesses then. My idea is leave them alone.
It's not a question of morality.
A businessman goes into business to make money. But, if he does not pay his employees, then the taxpayer picks up the tab. That difference between what the employer pays his / her employees and that money it takes for them to sustain themselves comes at a cost to you and I.
Case in point:
Georgia has something called Peachcare for children. It's like Medicare, only for the children of those people on limited incomes. Now, who do you suppose gets the lion's share of that money? Blacks? Whites? Maybe the children of those "
illegal aliens?" No. The group that is the largest recipients of Peachcare is the children of Walmart employees. Who comes in second? That would be the children of Publix grocery chain.
Walmart chief Doug McMillon, who made $25.6 million last year. In 2006 alone, Walmart donated
$272.9 MILLION DOLLARS to charities:
Wal-Mart keeps spot as top corporate charity
So, while Walmart is donating this to charity, virtually NONE of it is coming out of the pockets of the
BILLIONAIRE Waltons. The Waltons donate less than 1 percent of their own money to charities:
Report: Walmart's Billionaire Waltons Give Almost None Of Own Cash To Foundation
So, Walmart takes this money out of their corporate profits and gets great PR and lots of positive advertising while their employees live below the poverty level. AND, adding insult to injury, while the BILLIONAIRE Waltons are donating less than 1 percent of their income to charities, the average
middle class American donates 6 percent of their income.
So, here is the deal:
Walmart counters and says that they pay competitive wages. What they don't tell you is that they are the largest retail operation of their kind and they, more or less, get to set that competitive wage. That insulting wage comes at a cost to taxpayers who foot the cost for the difference between what people have to have to sustain themselves and what they get in wages.
If a corporation does not pay people an adequate wage, they should pay more in taxes. What I put on the table is a quid pro quo solution. The employer gets to choose. In the instant example, Walmart has been
convicted of knowingly hiring subcontractors that used undocumented foreigners. They pay insulting wages. By contrast, the children of the employees of Aldi Grocery stores
DO NOT qualify for Peach Care because Aldi pays above poverty level wages. Aldi hires Americans. Aldi should get a tax break and Walmart should be paying higher taxes. Both companies keep to get running their businesses as they always have and life goes on.
