Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Fizz]

delusional bullshit removed

all your crap has been debunked already. come up with something new.

null post.

Here's a null post for you agent, since you don't seem to know what they are.

You are a gay whale with aids

whales cant get AIDS you ******* moron!!

just more proof of what a delusional jackass you are and you dont understand what you post.

 

[DiveCon]

Now I'm certain your psyops is mostly sock puppets. Your language is too close to the other agents here.

<old, tired, and REPETITIVE, DELUSIONAL BULLSHIT removed>.

ever wonder if maybe, just MAYBE, if everyone else is telling you the same thing, that THEY might be right and you are WRONG?

and MASSIVELY so
pay your child support, dipshit and stop wasting your money on your ******* website when you should be paying for the care of your progeny

Since you cannot post an image of the supposed steel core columns in the core area your post is lies, subterfuge.

You are simply a pitiful agent of the infiltrators of the US government that supports the perpetrators of mass murder in their secret methods.

You respect no law and work to destroy the Consitution while trying to change the subject.

Why haven't you posted an image from 9-11 of this structure that FEMA presents in their diagram?

they have been posted ad nauseam
you are just too ******* delusional to admit it

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You are a gay whale with aids

Shows how much you know. The parts don't even line up enough to make this remotely possible.

You however, are a big eared delusional freak. And your photo proves it.

 

[Christophera]

I didn't say you should make null posts about null posts.

The infiltrating perps would want you to pretend otherwise in your false social group of your psyops.

Here is independently verified evidence showing a concrete core on 9-11.

on September 13, 2001 the buildings engineer provided information to Newsweek identifying a concrete core.

Independently verified evidence from all sources. Not endless inconsistent text from one, FEMA.

 

[DiveCon]

I didn't say you should make null posts about null posts.

every post YOU make is a NULL post, dipshit
you post photos showing steel core columns and deny its steel
you show a back lit dust cloud and claim it shows concrete
you are nothing but a ******* delusional dipshit

 

[Fizz]

==delusional bullshit removed==

still no pics of a concrete core.

null post.

 

[Liability]

* * * *

Here is independently verified evidence showing a concrete core on 9-11. [Followed by an 'image' that "shows" NO SUCH thing.]

* * * *

The delusional and always dishonest filthy NULL POSTER nullified his own post again.



NULL POSTER's null posts are nullities.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Chri$$y,

I'm going to break this to you as gently as I can.

Nobody on this planet believes your concrete theory. Not even another 9/11 truther.

 

[Fizz]

Chri$$y,

I'm going to break this to you as gently as I can.

Nobody on this planet believes your concrete theory. Not even another 9/11 truther.

his theory has to be pretty ******* retarded for more people to believe that small nuclear weapons brought down the towers than believe his concrete core hoax.

 

[Christophera]

agent fz, that is exactly what the perpetrators would want people to think.

There are many, many people that realize what the independently verified evidence means.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE]YouTube - North Tower - Concrete Core[/ame]

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So where is this case now?

 

[DiveCon]

So where is this case now?

the judge rejected it

 

[Fizz]

There are many, many people that realize what the independently verified evidence means.

you arent one of them.

 

[DiveCon]

There are many, many people that realize what the independently verified evidence means.

you arent one of them.

he clearly has no clue what "verified" means

 

[Rat in the Hat]

There are many, many people that realize what the independently verified evidence means.

you arent one of them.

And never will be.

 

[Christophera]

So where is this case now?

Not sure a clear answer can be made for that.

The most comprehensive answer is that the judges have rejected their official duty and made that duty ours to prosecute in civil court.

That is based on 2 factors.

1. TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 does not indicate the court has a duty to respond, reply or decide upon disclosure of felony or treason.

2. Both the federal Code of civil procedure and criminal procedure compel a response to an "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE".

Citizens conducting disclosure were forced to file a formal pleading for the disclosure. §2382 does not state that is required.

Basically the district court rules for the 9th circuit are inconsistent with US. Code because they do not allow judges to accept writings that are NOT filed.

All of the clerks agreed that under §2382 the citizens should be filing with the criminal clerk. The presiding judge ordered the disclosure of criminal felony and treason to be refiled as civil actions in citizens names without their authorization.

The rule of law under the Constitution appears to have been abandoned on nearly any level that might compel official compliance and examine illegal, official acts documented by citizens.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

So where is this case now?

Not sure a clear answer can be made for that.

The most comprehensive answer is that the judges have rejected their official duty and made that duty ours to prosecute in civil court.

That is based on 2 factors.

1. TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 does not indicate the court has a duty to respond, reply or decide upon disclosure of felony or treason.

2. Both the federal Code of civil procedure and criminal procedure compel a response to an "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE".

Citizens conducting disclosure were forced to file a formal pleading for the disclosure. §2382 does not state that is required.

Basically the district court rules for the 9th circuit are inconsistent with US. Code because they do not allow judges to accept writings that are NOT filed.

All of the clerks agreed that under §2382 the citizens should be filing with the criminal clerk. The presiding judge ordered the disclosure of criminal felony and treason to be refiled as civil actions in citizens names without their authorization.

The rule of law under the Constitution appears to have been abandoned on nearly any level that might compel official compliance and examine illegal, official acts documented by citizens.

Nobody believes you Chri$$y.

 

[Christophera]

That is what the perpetrators of mass murder would want everyone to think. You assist them.

No one can provide any independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

The concrete core has a great deal of independent verifications.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Christophera]

That is what the perpetrators of mass murder would want everyone to think. You assist them.

No one can provide any independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

The concrete core has a great deal of independent verifications.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

That is what the perpetrators of mass murder would want everyone to think. You assist them.

No one can provide any independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

The concrete core has a great deal of independent verifications.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Repetitive posting of debunked bullshit makes sure that nobody will believe you.