Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court
- Thread starter Christophera
- Start date
Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,023
- 198
There, I consolidated that up a little for you.
No need to thank me, I do it for the LULZ.
when are you gonna understand that you are nothing but a ******* laughing stock here?
Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,023
- 198
And on his death bed, he will still be a laughing stock.
So he's got that going for him.
Which is nice.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #2,105
It is understood that the perps would want people to think the social group they've placed here in their psyops is the way you describe. However, you agents are obviously not real people, in the sense of citizens under the Constitution. None of them would ever attempt your argument with no evidence not recognizing lawless government or Constitutional violations.
What is laughable is that you think your saying so means what you think it does.
What is laughable is that youor ANY agent has ever posted an image of this supposed structure seen in this, the only graphic depiction of the Towers core of any kind from official sources, on 9-11.
just keep proving what a fucktard you are
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #2,107
Gee, that is exactly what the infiltrators of the US govenrment that are the perpetrators of mass murder would want you to say.
What a coincidence, . . . agent.
What a coincidence, . . . agent.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #2,111
Correct. Your behaviors are unreasonable. Your agenda is obvious. You are all here to dismiss evidence that is required for due process in 3,000 murders. You are obstructing justice.
Concealment of felony and treason
the United States court, disclosure and knowledge of felony and treason pursuant to the law.
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”
APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR NOT ACCEPTING SUBMITTED COMPLIANCE OF CITIZENS ACTING PURSUANT TO U.S.C. TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1 §4 MISPRISION OF FELONY & CHAPTER 115, §2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Citizens depend on the judges of the United States Courts for competent and prompt action intervening in treason by felony under duly ratified and promulgated statutes, laws limiting conduct.
Citizens Brown and Elton on February 18, 2010 have presented independently verified evidence with facts establishing felony obstruction of justice in 3,000 homicides on September 11, 2001, wherein it is cognizably shown that fraudulent information regarding the fundamental design of the core of the Twin Towers was produced by a federal agency. Another named party, via misprision violating laws, deprived public agencies of vital information for the due process determination of “cause of death”. Another public system of media removed, then re edited a video documentary against the public interest to conceal the true design of the towers. By these acts the fraud of the federal agency was rendered credible ultimately obstructing proper analysis of structural collapse enabling presumption of collapse. That presumption was fraudulently used to justify compromise of the United States Constitution or its laws in misprision of felony, and illegal uses of the United States Military in treason.
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND CAUSE
Consistent with the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” A citizens duty and right to defend the Constitution against treason by their use of laws having no words to “deny or disparage” using the laws as they are obviously intended, U.S.C. TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 1 §4 & CHAPTER 115 §2382, in those sections or codes, compels these citizens with allegiance to the Constitution of United States of America to claim those rights and the court to accept the filed disclosure in the spirit of the law and the Constitution it was created under or show cause for not doing so with appropriate points and authorities.
PRAYER
The Citizens seeking a response to the application for an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for clarification of law in their efforts to comply in good faith with allegiance to the United States in the protection of its Constitution and laws made under it, pray for a decision from the judge of the court showing allegiance to the same.
Respectfully submitted,
DATE:_____________________ ____________________________
Christopher A. Brown
DATE:_____________________ ____________________________
Patricia C. Elton
I used this form of pleading to ask for a decision to define WHY laws would not be followed if they were not going to follow them.
The judges rejected their duty in 2 ways. ONE, not acknowleging that they had recieved the disclosure. TWO, not responding to the application for ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, a form we were forced to use that has the judicial duty of response.
Concealment of felony and treason
the United States court, disclosure and knowledge of felony and treason pursuant to the law.
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”
APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR NOT ACCEPTING SUBMITTED COMPLIANCE OF CITIZENS ACTING PURSUANT TO U.S.C. TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1 §4 MISPRISION OF FELONY & CHAPTER 115, §2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Citizens depend on the judges of the United States Courts for competent and prompt action intervening in treason by felony under duly ratified and promulgated statutes, laws limiting conduct.
Citizens Brown and Elton on February 18, 2010 have presented independently verified evidence with facts establishing felony obstruction of justice in 3,000 homicides on September 11, 2001, wherein it is cognizably shown that fraudulent information regarding the fundamental design of the core of the Twin Towers was produced by a federal agency. Another named party, via misprision violating laws, deprived public agencies of vital information for the due process determination of “cause of death”. Another public system of media removed, then re edited a video documentary against the public interest to conceal the true design of the towers. By these acts the fraud of the federal agency was rendered credible ultimately obstructing proper analysis of structural collapse enabling presumption of collapse. That presumption was fraudulently used to justify compromise of the United States Constitution or its laws in misprision of felony, and illegal uses of the United States Military in treason.
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND CAUSE
Consistent with the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” A citizens duty and right to defend the Constitution against treason by their use of laws having no words to “deny or disparage” using the laws as they are obviously intended, U.S.C. TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 1 §4 & CHAPTER 115 §2382, in those sections or codes, compels these citizens with allegiance to the Constitution of United States of America to claim those rights and the court to accept the filed disclosure in the spirit of the law and the Constitution it was created under or show cause for not doing so with appropriate points and authorities.
PRAYER
The Citizens seeking a response to the application for an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for clarification of law in their efforts to comply in good faith with allegiance to the United States in the protection of its Constitution and laws made under it, pray for a decision from the judge of the court showing allegiance to the same.
Respectfully submitted,
DATE:_____________________ ____________________________
Christopher A. Brown
DATE:_____________________ ____________________________
Patricia C. Elton
I used this form of pleading to ask for a decision to define WHY laws would not be followed if they were not going to follow them.
The judges rejected their duty in 2 ways. ONE, not acknowleging that they had recieved the disclosure. TWO, not responding to the application for ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, a form we were forced to use that has the judicial duty of response.
Last edited:
keep proving everyone right for calling you a delusional fucktard
that little voice in his head told him so
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #2,116
why do you continue to lie like that?
oh thats right. because thats all you know how to do is lie.
sorry. i forgot for a second that you are ******* LYING PIECE OF SHIT.
Your crappy floor diagram is not what I'm talking about. The perps would want you to pretend to be a moron. I'm talking about a graphic depcition that shows the horizontal and diagonal connections. Something that details what this depicts in greater detail.
they didnt need morewhy do you continue to lie like that?
oh thats right. because thats all you know how to do is lie.
sorry. i forgot for a second that you are ******* LYING PIECE OF SHIT.
Your crappy floor diagram is not what I'm talking about. The perps would want you to pretend to be a moron. I'm talking about a graphic depcition that shows the horizontal and diagonal connections. Something that details what this depicts in greater detail.
dipshit
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #2,119
NIST is disqualified from supporting the FEMA deception because they don't refer to plans.
We need INDEPENDENT verifications like this.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
We need INDEPENDENT verifications like this.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
grow a brain, dipshit
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Some claim Islamic Republic massacred 90,000 (in crackdown on 1.5 million protesters)- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 7
-
At the corrupted UN (UnitedNothing) dictatorship have a say about 'human rights'
- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 21
-
Trump tried to cut the head off the Iran snake but it keeps biting him- Started by GavanPeacefan
- Replies: 5
-
