Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 64,961
- 49,761
- 3,615
Not all are citizensHow many citizens per congressman do you feel would be appropriate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not all are citizensHow many citizens per congressman do you feel would be appropriate?
I think everyone should have their own Representative. Our needs are sooooooo unique we need bespoke representationEach representative speaks for 760,000 people. This number is clearly too large for effective representation.
It’s Time to Expand the House of Representatives - Harvard Political Review
An increase in the number of U.S. representatives would remedy a century-old policy misstep and help the House better serve its purpose of serving the needs and interests of American citizens.theharvardpoliticalreview.com
Most would be gerrymandered, of course. But there will be more purple districts if we increase the number. The larger issue is, of course, how to expand it and to what number. I don’t know the former. The latter...we need to essentially double the size of the house. Espansion should take place in three stages over 16 years. This would eleviate any shocks to the system to where there are too many of any one party elected at once. Whats more is that this can (and likely will) create seats for third parties since it will tkae fewer voters to win a seat in Congress.
Increasing the number of reps MAY devalue the office in the eyes of a lobbyist or PAC.The premise is all wrong. The existing politicians in the house DO NOT represent their local constituents, they represent the Big Money donors and lobbyists that fund them, and they represent the Party they belong to. Ditto for the senators. If We The People want better representation we have to do it at the local level where our voices can actually be heard. This means transferring as much power as possible away from the federal government and giving it back to the states. If the states can't give the people the representation they deserve then you transfer as much power as possible down to the county level. And if the country can't get it done you transfer it down even further.
How many citizens per congressman do you feel would be appropriate?
I think at at least doubling the current size would be sufficient. Also, why does every vote require a physical quorum in D.C.? We're in the 21st century now. They should be spending most of their time in their home districts where they are more accessible to their constituents and less so to D.C. lobbyists. With the technology we have, there is no reason why they shouldn't be able to vote from their local offices.