Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Humans can't get near the speed of light or c. Sure, we can do that for subatomic particles using very expensive equipment, but traveling that fast isn't natural. What we have in real life is velocity or v. E = mv² is the best we can do. There lies the rub.The maximum velocity in the true fourth dimension is c²: one light-year every three minutes. It has no effect on time.
I can see that I got to you because you lost the argument again and have to resort to ad hominem attacks. Creation scientists have embarrassed the atheist scientists and long time because they were able to date inorganic rocks and diamonds found in the same layers as their millions and billions of years fossils using C14 dating.Creationists embarrass themselves. A scientist knows they are mistaking noise as signal. Read up on noise floor.I just said the Christians use C14 on organic, living materials such as fossils. Not rocks or diamonds unless it was to embarrass the atheist scientists and catch them in their lies. How can diamonds and rocks still have C14 remaining when they're found in millions and billions of years old layers as claimed by the atheist scientists?
As usual you are reduced to making insults as a substitute for analytic thinking.You are a hater. No one thinks much of your posts. You think your posts are smart, but they're ones that float in the tb. You don't answer my questions and are usually wrong or post out and out lies. You love noise and that's what you are. Another lolser.
.
My "attack" was toward creation scientists not directly at you. You are essentially saying my ad hominem attack was pointing out that your post was an ad hominem attack! How ironic. That is right from the troll play book. You have not made any cogent reply to the science.I can see that I got to you because you lost the argument again and have to resort to ad hominem attacks. Creation scientists have embarrassed the atheist scientists and long time because they were able to date inorganic rocks and diamonds found in the same layers as their millions and billions of years fossils using C14 dating.
Why don't you study physics? Time and space are related and both are necessary. Space itself is matter. What you don't understand is spacetime vs. vacuum.Mind Undermines MatterI was saying time has to have matter to exist. Physics states time is a property of matter. Once that happens, then we get special relativity.Weirdo Nerds Push Such Nonsense Because They Are Mentally Unbalanced EscapistsDon't be stupid. Time exists because we exist. Matter can't exist without time. If there was no time, then we would not exist.Time doesn't actually exist. It's simply a concept created to explain how we perceive the chronology of events.
It’s official: time doesn’t exist
So what time features should we feed our ML models?towardsdatascience.com
Time is merely an attribute, like color.
Time exists in empty space; no matter is needed. Postmodern physics has to complicate theories that can't stand on their own; that's why it ties time to matter, energy, and the kitchen sink.
The point is C14 remains and can be done on billions of years old diamonds. If they were truly old, then there would be no C14 present.My "attack" was toward creation scientists not directly at you. You are essentially saying my ad hominem attack was pointing out that your post was an ad hominem attack! How ironic. That is right from the troll play book. You have not made any cogent reply to the science.I can see that I got to you because you lost the argument again and have to resort to ad hominem attacks. Creation scientists have embarrassed the atheist scientists and long time because they were able to date inorganic rocks and diamonds found in the same layers as their millions and billions of years fossils using C14 dating.
Just what argument do you think I lost?
Here is another example of long life dating.
Rhenium Re-187, decays into osmium Os-187 with a half-life of 41 billion years.
There are 5 stable isotopes of Osmium
Os-187 1.96%
Os-188 13.24%
Os-189 16.15%
Os-190 26.26%
Os-192 40.78%
Some samples of Rh-Os have been found completely encased in diamonds and can be used to date diamonds to several billion years. Contamination is very unlikely. If there were outside unrelated Osmium contamination, then 98% of the Os would not be Os-187 because that isotope is very rare in nature.
The diamonds are billions of years old. C14 dating of diamonds is foolish.
Tiny Inclusions Reveal Diamond Age and Earth’s History: Research at the Carnegie Institution | Research & News
Diamond inclusion research yields age and insight into earth historywww.gia.edu
.
I disagree.Time doesn't actually exist. It's simply a concept created to explain how we perceive the chronology of events.
It’s official: time doesn’t exist
So what time features should we feed our ML models?
Space and time are the same thing.We’re so used to the world being in 3 dimensions that we forget that the 4th exist and it’s called time
Aha.There is no need to respond to a wacktard who has no understanding of physics nor can write understandable English haha.You never heard of spacetime?I was saying time has to have matter to exist.Weirdo Nerds Push Such Nonsense Because They Are Mentally Unbalanced EscapistsDon't be stupid. Time exists because we exist. Matter can't exist without time. If there was no time, then we would not exist.Time doesn't actually exist. It's simply a concept created to explain how we perceive the chronology of events.
It’s official: time doesn’t exist
So what time features should we feed our ML models?
Time is merely an attribute, like color.
Why?
Physics states time is a property of matter.
Einstein said the flow of time depends relativelly on the geometrie of the space. And mass curves the space. That's why time flows relativelly faster and slower - but always is past past and future future, although natural laws give results in both directions (what was <-> what will be). But this not means matter creates time or time needs matter to exist. And in quantum mechanical experiments time is unbelievable precise in the measurements - while mass seems not to be measurable, if I understand such experiments correctly.
Once that happens, then we get special relativity.
What about if you would start to read and try to understand what others said here?
It's just common sense physics. Your example with Einstein just backs up what I stated. Time has to have matter to exist.
Again: Why?
Time needs mass and space.
The relativity of time correlates with a curved space. Mass curves the so called spacetime (=Minkowski space). But over big distances - even about billions of lightyears - the space is flat, what's unbelievable astonshing. Why has a triangle exactly 180° in such gigantic dimensions?
While I agree time is relatively faster and slower, it depends on altitude or gravitational time dilation.
Mass curving the space is gravity,
Mass is gravity. Gravity curves the spacetime.
another fundamental force discovered by creation scientist Sir Isaac Newton.
?
Moreover, time is past, present, and future; Not just past past and future future. There is no results in both directions.
You are able to calculate where the Earth was and where it will be in the same way.
It's been demonstrated that we cannot go back in time.
How? Name of this experiment or name of the scientist who found this out?
Why? One can't travel faster than light.
Something what has mass is not able to travel faster than light. What about if something has a negative mass?
You believe in science fiction.
You say that mass produces time without to say how mass is doing this.
What about to read what's written here?Space and time are the same thing.We’re so used to the world being in 3 dimensions that we forget that the 4th exist and it’s called time
zaangalewa
I am not going to debate this as it’s not a subject that I feel comfortable in
Very abstract
The abundance of C14 in a 100,000 year old sample is one Carbon14 per 130,000,000,000,000,000 carbon12 atoms. There are only 384 C14 atoms in 1 mg of a 100,000 year old sample. Carbon 14 is everywhere in the atmosphere. A dug up relic is exposed to the air. Contamination is a real concern that creationists do not understand.The point is C14 remains and can be done on billions of years old diamonds. If they were truly old, then there would be no C14 present.
In Rh-Os dating I showed that the sample is completely isolated in the diamond. Both elements are extremely rare. So scientist do know what is present. Even in the unlikely case there was contamination, isotopic analysis would clearly show that.Furthermore, I've shown that radiometric dating is not accurate in that one doesn't know what was present in the organic and inorganic material in the beginning. If you take dinosaur fossils, there were still C14 remaining and soft tissue present.
In the case of RH-Os the ratio is measured.one doesn't know what was present in the organic and inorganic material in the beginning.
There are many things in physics that are hard for the mind to relate to. But physics is evidenced based and the evidence must prevail. That is the scientific method.I've also pointed out that it is hard to relate to what a million or billion years old Earth is supposed to be.
Creationists are ignoring the noise limitations of C14 just so they can fit science to the bible.Atheist scientists just made it up in order to fit atheism and evolution.
This is not between "one of us" it is between thousands of scientists versus creationists who assume their interpretation of the bible is truth and try to distort science to fit it.Only one of us can be right.
The theory of gravitation and electromagnetic fields would fail in a space of any dimension other than three. The inverse square laws depend on 3 spatial dimensions.
Why? Timespace is already defined as being FOUR dimensions!
scribeNature Is Not SupernaturalHubble was able to convince Einstein that time was indeed a dimension, and what was lacking in Einstein's theories.
Because time is a dimension, and Christ and God are inter-dimensional, (as will we be in glorified bodies) they can move forward and backward in the dimension, which is how God can tell us the future accurately. He can visit the future at will...
That's how this nonsense started. God cannot create a contradiction, such as a square circle. So he also cannot see the future, which is not out there for anyone to see.
Time doesn't exist. It's a human construct.
We want to believe it.
You're really hung up on the age of Earth aren't you? It was an atheist scientist who wanted to date rocks and came up with radiometric dating. As I pointed out, the creation scientists wanted to date fossils, not rocks or diamonds, using C14 dating. Maybe their scientist came up with radiocarbon dating. Regardless, the age of the Earth wasn't a concern to them until the atheist scientists dated meteors and claimed the Earth was billions of years old. Then, they showed the dinosaur fossils weren't with C14 dating and soft tissue still remaining.The abundance of C14 in a 100,000 year old sample is one Carbon14 per 130,000,000,000,000,000 carbon12 atoms. There are only 384 C14 atoms in 1 mg of a 100,000 year old sample. Carbon 14 is everywhere in the atmosphere. A dug up relic is exposed to the air. Contamination is a real concern that creationists do not understand.The point is C14 remains and can be done on billions of years old diamonds. If they were truly old, then there would be no C14 present.
In Rh-Os dating I showed that the sample is completely isolated in the diamond. Both elements are extremely rare. So scientist do know what is present. Even in the unlikely case there was contamination, isotopic analysis would clearly show that.Furthermore, I've shown that radiometric dating is not accurate in that one doesn't know what was present in the organic and inorganic material in the beginning. If you take dinosaur fossils, there were still C14 remaining and soft tissue present.
C-14 is not rare and can contaminate anything exposed to modern air.
In the case of RH-Os the ratio is measured.one doesn't know what was present in the organic and inorganic material in the beginning.
There are many things in physics that are hard for the mind to relate to. But physics is evidenced based and the evidence must prevail. That is the scientific method.I've also pointed out that it is hard to relate to what a million or billion years old Earth is supposed to be.
Creationists are ignoring the noise limitations of C14 just so they can fit science to the bible.Atheist scientists just made it up in order to fit atheism and evolution.
This is not between "one of us" it is between thousands of scientists versus creationists who assume their interpretation of the bible is truth and try to distort science to fit it.Only one of us can be right.
I really don't care if you want to believe what creationists say. But when you bring faulty science to a science form, I must object to that.
.......
