Tim Walz' Worst Policy > Infanticide

protectionist

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
59,649
Reaction score
20,204
Points
2,250
With the litany of horrendous policies that Tim Walz espouses, it would take an incredibly evil one to be the worst. Nevertheless, despite going against even Democrat public opinion, Walz signed a bill a year ago, SF2995, legalizing the killing of already born babies, who survive abortions, by denying them lifesaving care, thereby committing infanticide.

Harris/Walz supporters can read the 2 links I've posted here, and they can go through the details, but no matter what they say, or may try to spin it, the bottom line is Walz OKd this bill in which infants born alive & healthy, could be denied lifesaving care and allowed to die.

Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.

And what is Walz' record on this issue ? It's criminal. Before this despicable law was passed, in Walz’s state and on his watch, five infants were "born alive" in 2021 during failed abortions, and none was provided life-saving care though two got “comfort care,” the Minnesota Department of Health reported on July 1, 2022. and the 3 who did not receive even "comfort care" ? > got no blankets, no cuddling, and died of hypothermia in cold hospital operating rooms - they froze to death.

File
MNAbortionReportJuly2022.pdf
Three other infants were "born alive" during abortions in 2019, Walz’s first year as governor, and they too perished without life-saving care, according to a July 1, 2020 report from the same state agency.



Just to show how deliberate was this heinous act by Walz, and his fellow Democrats in the Minnesota legislature, SF2995 revoked, a 2015 legislation > the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (section145.423)" recognizing a born alive infant resulting from an induced abortion as a human person (section 145.423, subdivision 1) and requiring that “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
 
Last edited:
But let's stay on topic (especially for those who might foolishly want to out-gross you)
 
With the litany of horrendous policies that Tim Walz espouses, it would take an incredibly evil one to be the worst. Nevertheless, despite going against even Democrat public opinion, Walz signed a bill a year ago, SF2995, legalizing the killing of already born babies, who survive abortions, by denying them lifesaving care, thereby committing infanticide.

Harris/Walz supporters can read the 2 links I've posted here, and they can go through the details, but no matter what they say, or may try to spin it, the bottom line is Walz OKd this bill in which infants born alive & healthy, could be denied lifesaving care and allowed to die.

Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.

And what is Walz' record on this issue ? It's criminal. Before this despicable law was passed, in Walz’s state and on his watch, five infants were "born alive" in 2021 during failed abortions, and none was provided life-saving care though two got “comfort care,” the Minnesota Department of Health reported on July 1, 2022. and the 3 who did not receive even "comfort care" ? > got no blankets, no cuddling, and died of hypothermia in cold hospital operating rooms - they froze to death.

File
MNAbortionReportJuly2022.pdf
Three other infants were "born alive" during abortions in 2019, Walz’s first year as governor, and they too perished without life-saving care, according to a July 1, 2020 report from the same state agency.



Just to show how deliberate was this heinous act by Walz, and his fellow Democrats in the Minnesota legislature, SF2995 revoked, a 2015 legislation > the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (section145.423)" recognizing a born alive infant resulting from an induced abortion as a human person (section 145.423, subdivision 1) and requiring that “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.
 
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.
FALSE! All the 24 infants mentioned were born alive, and then left to die. Can you read ?
 
Last edited:
Regarding the 24 infants not given care as required by the 2015 law, were charges placed against the non-caregivers ? If not, why not ?
 
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.
23 week old fetus. Kill her, tough guy.


wbw-your-baby-2021-alt-w23-1200x1200.jpg
 
With the litany of horrendous policies that Tim Walz espouses, it would take an incredibly evil one to be the worst. Nevertheless, despite going against even Democrat public opinion, Walz signed a bill a year ago, SF2995, legalizing the killing of already born babies, who survive abortions, by denying them lifesaving care, thereby committing infanticide.

Harris/Walz supporters can read the 2 links I've posted here, and they can go through the details, but no matter what they say, or may try to spin it, the bottom line is Walz OKd this bill in which infants born alive & healthy, could be denied lifesaving care and allowed to die.

Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.

And what is Walz' record on this issue ? It's criminal. Before this despicable law was passed, in Walz’s state and on his watch, five infants were "born alive" in 2021 during failed abortions, and none was provided life-saving care though two got “comfort care,” the Minnesota Department of Health reported on July 1, 2022. and the 3 who did not receive even "comfort care" ? > got no blankets, no cuddling, and died of hypothermia in cold hospital operating rooms - they froze to death.

File
MNAbortionReportJuly2022.pdf
Three other infants were "born alive" during abortions in 2019, Walz’s first year as governor, and they too perished without life-saving care, according to a July 1, 2020 report from the same state agency.



Just to show how deliberate was this heinous act by Walz, and his fellow Democrats in the Minnesota legislature, SF2995 revoked, a 2015 legislation > the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (section145.423)" recognizing a born alive infant resulting from an induced abortion as a human person (section 145.423, subdivision 1) and requiring that “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
Walz was not governor of Minnesota in 2015
 
The Democrats have always attracted evil people to their cause. They are the party of people who end up in hell. They are the party of Satan.
The only difference between Republicans and dimocrap scum is The People in the Political Party. The PEOPLE that vote for them.

How they perceive the people they're voting for. Here it is and I don't give a FUCK if it offends somebody's sensibilities.

dimocrap scum voters vote for dimocrap scum politicians because they, THEMSELVES, are scum.

People that don't like that simple FACT are who I am describing.

But OMB said, "Pussy" so there's your moral equivalency as far as dimocrap scum are concerned. Plus, he sends mean tweets every now and then. And he's guilty of paying off a Blackmailer and filing it on his Income Taxes incorrectly. And he was convicted in a CIVIL Trial of assaulting a woman who has accused 6 other men of rape...... And the allegation was 24 years old.

You know, the more you think about it. dimocraps really are scum. Every one of them.
 
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.
So you tell us you are pro-life and yet you make feeble excuses for extreme pro-abortion policies.

This seems like a complete contradiction.
 
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.


Alabama boy certified as world's most premature baby

A US boy born at 21 weeks and a day weighing under a pound has been certified as the world's most premature baby to survive.
Curtis Means was delivered in Birmingham, Alabama, last year weighing just 420g (14.8 ounces).
Guinness World Records confirmed that Curtis, who is now thriving at 16 months old, set the new record.
 
Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.
I'm looking for an honest answer.

There are ways to determine the health of a fetus.....this is FACT.

If it is determined that a fetus will DIE and there is ZERO chance of survival outside the womb.
You still consider this MURDER if an abortion is performed?
 
I'm looking for an honest answer.

There are ways to determine the health of a fetus.....this is FACT.

If it is determined that a fetus will DIE and there is ZERO chance of survival outside the womb.
You still consider this MURDER if an abortion is performed?
No, buy that is outside the topic of this thread. Please stay on topic. 😐
 
Back
Top Bottom