Those who refuse to learn from History...

[ESay]

I never heard either one even talk about "mass immigration", go figure.

You're right about one thing, my grandfather lived in a time where racism was socially acceptable, and he was pretty racist by today's standards. My father less so, but he came of age in the era of segregation, and still carried some of that baggage.

In my family, my generation moved beyond that. I'm just not interested in passing judgment on people based on characteristics beyond their control.

My opinion of someone is based on how they treat other people. There are good people and there are bad people, but I'm not a mind reader who can look at someone and know what's in their heart. I need more information than the color of their skin, or they speak a different language than me.

Your post says nothing about me Jose, but it says a lot about you...

From what I can get, some people in the US are afraid of the current changes in 'racial' make up of the US. From the creation of the US and till some recent days, the US was a nation of a WASP man. And yes, it was a melting pot.

Now, the US is becoming more diverse. And a question arises whether it will be able to remain this melting pot, or 'balkanization' of some states may happen. And I should admit that these concerns are not so groundless.

 

[para bellum]

From what I can get, some people in the US are afraid of the current changes in 'racial' make up of the US. From the creation of the US and till some recent days, the US was a nation of a WASP man. And yes, it was a melting pot.

My advice to those people is to do one of those "23 and me" tests or similar. They will learn how "racially pure" they really are.

Now, the US is becoming more diverse. And a question arises whether it will be able to remain this melting pot, or 'balkanization' of some states may happen. And I should admit that these concerns are not so groundless.

The US won't balkanize. The issue is that doing immigration in an unplanned and unmanaged way creates enclaves, which makes assimilation a slow process. Even in those places, by the third generation, they are pretty much fully "Americanized".

Americans are mongrels. Including the ones who think they aren't....

 

[ESay]

My advice to those people is to do one of those "23 and me" tests or similar. They will learn how "racially pure" they really are.

The US won't balkanize. The issue is that doing immigration in an unplanned and unmanaged way creates enclaves, which makes assimilation a slow process. Even in those places, by the third generation, they are pretty much fully "Americanized".

Americans are mongrels. Including the ones who think they aren't....

What can you say about Latin Americans? Is 'Latinization' of some states reversible? Or this issue is artificially overestimated?

 

[para bellum]

What can you say about Latin Americans? Is 'Latinization' of some states reversible? Or this issue is artificially overestimated?

I've spent some time in Mexico and Central America. I love the countries and the people. The roads are treacherous and the taxi drivers are fearless, lol.

The officials expect a small bribe when you interact with them, but it's not excessive- it's more of a gratuity. It should be given with a "gracias", like you are acknowledging the favor they are doing for you.

Latinos are hard-working, mostly Catholic, very family-oriented. They will invite you into their homes, and feed you, and give you the shirt off their back. Like everyone else, if you treat them with respect you will get it right back. They are not automatically suspicious of strangers.

No need to "de-latinize" anywhere, in most of those "some states", they were there before the anglos arrived. What would Texas be without "Tex-Mex"? I wouldn't recognize it.

The majority trying to get into the US are just looking for a better life. They are some of the hardest workers you will ever meet- It's not easy to get here.

There is a criminal gang element that's a problem, and we need to find a solution to that. The fact is that the majority of their victims are not Anglos- they prey on other Latinos first and foremost.

I have no problem with Latinos. I wish those countries were safer, I'd like to go for another visit but I'm not very comfortable traveling there right now.

 

[Litwin]

Russia

your horde SUCKS IVAN

 

[Litwin]

In 1950, the chinese foreign minister, Zhou Enlai, spent at least 4 months issuing strongly worded warnings to the international community:

WHEN YOU GIVE BACK OUTER MANCHURIA BACK TO CHINA, IVAN ?

 

[José]

Originally posted by para bellum
You're right about one thing, my grandfather lived in a time where racism was socially acceptable, and he was pretty racist by today's standards. My father less so, but he came of age in the era of segregation, and still carried some of that baggage.

In my family, my generation moved beyond that. I'm just not interested in passing judgment on people based on characteristics beyond their control.

Notice how the multiracialist ideology completely distorts parabellum's perception of the time interval between his grandfather's youth and today. He sees this period of time as a righteous evolution from the last remnants of racial supremacism that existed in America in the first half of the 20th century to something much closer to racial equality today.

His vision is only partially correct. It's obvious that Jim Crow's America was an immorality that needed to be dismantled and that was a positive development. But the multiracialist ideology prevents para bellum from realizing that beginning in 1960 America crossed the line that divides the just cause of racial equality from the total insanity of destroying America's white majority through mass non-white immigration and the drastically reduction of white americans through miscegenation (aka, genocide).

Multiracialism clouds para bellum's mind and prevents him from realizing that establishing equality among the US ethnic groups who have a historic presence in the country has nothing to do with the destruction of the country's demographics and genocide... he can't understand that the former is just while the latter is a crime against humanity.

In reality, you have to turn para bellum's perception upside down to get to the truth. Although the dismantlement of Jim Crow was a long overdue measure and absolutely correct what really happened in America in the last century was an INVOLUTION because racial supremacism was replaced by genocide. The genocide of an ethnic group is incomparably more morally depraved than even slavery itself, let alone, the kind of social and political discrimination/apartheid known in the US as Jim Crow. Even a fully fledged totalitarian state like North Korea is a paragon of justice and morality when compared to a country like America where you have a genocide going on.

But here you have para bellum, Tom Paine 1949, Richard-H, xyz, toomuchtime, Tommy Tainnant, Clayton Jones, the ukrainian Esay, the russian Antontoo and dozens upon dozens of others, all of them immersed in a state of mental confusion of astronomical proportions, caused by multiracialism, praising the wonders and glories of a genocidal state "just" because it established racial equality before the law among its citizens 60 years ago.

 

[José]

Originally posted by para bellum
My opinion of someone is based on how they treat other people. There are good people and there are bad people, but I'm not a mind reader who can look at someone and know what's in their heart. I need more information than the color of their skin, or they speak a different language than me.

Good for you, bellum... This proves you're a decent human being.

Opposing the genocide of white americans has nothing to do with treating colored people bad, with going around calling them *******, spics and gooks. This is rudeness. I've never done that in my entire life myself.

But you are confusing to different kinds of entities that behave completely different.

Para bellum, José, John Edgar Slow Horses, Esay, etc... are human beings, individuals, while Russia, China and Argentina are nation states.

As individuals, as citizens, para bellum, Backagain, Antontoo are totally free to dream about millions of africans, Latinos, asians flooding the USA... They are under no obligation to protect the racial composition of their nation... And everybody expects them to treat americans of different racial backgrounds with respect and civility.

But you cannot confuse human beings with nation states.

Unlike its citizens, America, Ukraine, Japan have a sacred duty to protect their historic racial composition because their racial makeup is a vital part of the very definition of nation states themselves:
NATION: noun - a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.

https://brainly.in/question/25295783

This is what's really funny about multiracialism if you can find anything humorous about a genocidal "ideology":

You don't need to spend 6 years at Harvard reading piles of books on Political Science to finally understand why multiracialism is a mental disease thinly disguised as a socio-political ideology. The mere definition of the word nation is more than enough.

Multiracialism is an ideology that preaches that nations must be racially "diversified", that nations must destroy a vital element of the very definition of a nation itself!! (PEOPLE UNITED BY COMMON DESCENT).

The ideology is so insane that the mere definion of nation is enough to refute it. The fact that the US and western Europe succeeded in brainwashing millions of americans and western Europeans into believing their nations should destroy one of the funamental pillars of nationhood, of what makes them nations, speaks volumes about the intellectual level of the average western citizen.

When an individual quits his job, quits College, stops taking showers and shave, distances himself from his family, friends and girlfriend, locks himself in his room and stays there all day, etc... What does everybody say about him? He's starting to suffer from a psychological disease.

The same is true for a nation that starts cannibalizing its racial composition.

When China, India, Nigeria, Japan see what's happening in America, a sovereign country voluntarily canibalizing its own racial composition they first can't believe their eyes and after they recover from the initial shock they shake their heads in disbelief and think to themselves:

This country is batshit crazy!!

As they say:

When someone says you're crazy you can just ignore him but when everybody says you're crazy it's time to go see a psychiatrist.

The whole world says America, Canada, Germany went crazy after WWII.

Sorry to break the news to you all but people and nation states are not the same thing.

Parabellum, just like Martin Luther King, can afford the luxury of ignoring someone's race, they can afford the luxury of only looking to the content of one's character because he's an individual but the american nation state can't.

Parabellum, AlexPK and Esay can dream about their countries being flooded by non-whites all they want... it's their right as individuals but the nation states of America, Russia and Ukraine, respectively, have a solemn duty to make sure their wish remains just that... a dream.

It's as simple as that.

 

[Ringo]

Boomerang in action
Le Parisien: Two arrested French citizens who took part in the fighting against Russia in Ukraine and tried to smuggle sniper sights and fuses into Paris have begun to testify. They had been fighting for four months, but decided to flee "to stay alive."
They allegedly wanted to sell the explosives and sights. The investigation continues, but a signal has been "thrown" into society that weapons can be taken out of Ukraine that can be used for terrorist purposes.