This Road is for Jews Only. Yes, There is Apartheid in Israel

[Victory67]

So which nation is suffering from apartheid then. As for Goldstone he being a Judge knows the LAW far better than some spotty faced little kid who has yet to have his first wet dream.

There is no rule that Apartheid can only apply to a soveriegn nation. You just keep lying but its not helping your argument.

 

[Phoenall]

In fact, I think Victory is Jewish.

No I am not a Jew. I have Jewish friends but I'm not a Jew. My mother is Presbyterian and my father is Catholic.

Then recite the Lords Prayer, the Decameron and the beatitudes like a good little Christian can.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Israel and Occupied Palestine are suffering from Apartheid, mentally challenged Zionist!

You? You're going to file charges?

>>South African Judge Richard Goldstone, head of the Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, also known as the Goldstone Report, writing in The New York Times in October 2011, said that "in Israel, there is no apartheid. Nothing there comes close to the definition of apartheid under the 1998 Rome Statute." Goldstone noted that Arab citizens of Israel are allowed to vote, have political parties, and hold seats in the Knesset and other positions, including one on the Israeli Supreme Court. Goldstone wrote that the situation in the West Bank was more complex, but that there is no attempt to maintain "an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group", and claimed that the seemingly oppressive measures taken by Israel were taken to protect its own citizens from attacks by Palestinian militants. ~ Goldstone, Richard J. (October 31, 2011). "Israel and the Apartheid Slander". New York Times.<<

Your prejudice over reaches your knowledge and abilities. You are too funny

Dick Goldstein is welcome to his opinions but he is wrong.

Israel does many things in the WB that fit the definition for Apartheid.

So which nation is suffering from apartheid then. As for Goldstone he being a Judge knows the LAW far better than some spotty faced little kid who has yet to have his first wet dream.

 

[Victory67]

Eventually Israel will face the possibility of international judgement over their Apartheid regime in the West Bank.

They will most likely instead just pull back to the Seperation Barrier, and call it a day. This will give Palestine control of 91.5% of the West Bank.

 

[Kondor3]

Yes, yes, yes...

Very nice, I'm sure...

This is, like, HOW many times, you've parroted the same thing, in the last few pages...

We heard you the first time...

You're wrong, but we heard you.

Anything new to contribute?

Eventually Israel will face the possibility of international judgement over their Apartheid regime in the West Bank.

They will most likely instead just pull back to the Seperation Barrier, and call it a day. This will give Palestine control of 91.5% of the West Bank.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Apartheid is such an ugly practice.

South Africans attest it is much worse in Israel and Palestine then it ever was in South Africa.

Why don't you recite the Satanic Zionist verses that guide you Zionists for us all?

Inquiring readers want to know what makes Zionists tick and what in this world can make a soul support the Apartheid Israel carries out.

In fact, I think Victory is Jewish.

No I am not a Jew. I have Jewish friends but I'm not a Jew. My mother is Presbyterian and my father is Catholic.

Then recite the Lords Prayer, the Decameron and the beatitudes like a good little Christian can.

 

[Kondor3]

He IS a funny wee little boggit, isn't he?

As most of the pro-Palestinian folk are...

Well then, Israel conquered the West Bank in the '67 War.

well, now there are international laws about these things. laws that Israel has sworn to uphold and respect. its now illegal to build housing on land that you won in a war, unless you at least annex the land and reach a peace treaty with the other nation you were at war with. not so during the 1800s.

WRONG ONCE AGAIN SILLY LITTLE BOY. It is not illegal to build on land you own and have title to, which includes most of East Jerusalem. It is not illegal to occupy land for defence and enforce military rule on the people if they are sworn enemies of the occupiers. Once the Palestinians declare peace and agree to terms then Israel will hand them the land back as required by UN res 242 and the Geneva conventions. Once the Palestinians understand what the law says then they will capitulate and sign for anything that is offered

 

[Phoenall]

And reclaiming land stolen in war is legal and the Jews are doing just that. Over 80% of Jerusalem was Jewish owned in May 1948, by the time of the armistice this was reduced to zero.

By the way the UN charter strictly prohibits land gained through war, so even if the arabs had won in 1948 they could not live in Israel and claim it as theirs.

There is no evidence that 80% of Greater Jerusalem was owned by Jews before 1949.

Do you want to bet on that, or will you deny the evidence of the PLO themselves

PA: Jews Owned Land in Judea and Samaria | Jerusalem Post - Blogs

Did you know that the PLO wrote a paper describing, in detail, the legal rights of Jews to lands that they owned prior to 1948?

Jews who owned land have the right to have their land restored to them or to be compensated, if restitution is not materially possible. Jews are entitled to compensation for other material and non-material losses, including lost profits, lost income, etc. caused by their displacement and dispossession.

Between 1948 and 1967, as even the Palestinian Authority negotiating team has to admit, Jordan, who illegally occupied the territory that was supposed to become the "Arab State" in 1948, and Egypt confiscated Jewish-owned land, against international humanitarian law:

… Apparently, 80% of Har Homa’s [Jabal Abu Ghneim’s] land is Jewish land purchased in the forties and before. The JNF lost land in the Dheisheh refugee camp in the West Bank as well, and this matter has been postponed for the eventual [peace] talks for over a decade.

 

[Victory67]

Yes, yes, yes...

Very nice, I'm sure...

This is, like, HOW many times, you've parroted the same thing, in the last few pages...

We heard you the first time...

You're wrong, but we heard you.

Anything new to contribute?

You saying I am wrong, doesn't make me wrong.

 

[Kondor3]

What a load of elephant shit...

The mad-dog Palestinians have been walled-off to prevent death and injury to Israeli citizens...

As inflicted upon innocent Israelis by Intifada I and II and Gazan rocket-barrage campaigns ever since...

They are now reaping the consequences of their earlier foolishness, intransigence, savagery and barbarism...

They have no one to blame but themselves...

Better luck, next lifetime...

For now, time to slink out of Rump Palestine into some neighboring Arab country in the middle of the night, and build a new life for yourselves, elsewhere...

'Cause the one you're in now is a Dead End...

Apartheid is such an ugly practice.

South Africans attest it is much worse in Israel and Palestine then it ever was in South Africa.

Why don't you recite the Satanic Zionist verses that guide you Zionists for us all?

Inquiring readers want to know what makes Zionists tick and what in this world can make a soul support the Apartheid Israel carries out.

No I am not a Jew. I have Jewish friends but I'm not a Jew. My mother is Presbyterian and my father is Catholic.

Then recite the Lords Prayer, the Decameron and the beatitudes like a good little Christian can.

 

[Kondor3]

Yes, yes, yes... Very nice, I'm sure... This is, like, HOW many times, you've parroted the same thing, in the last few pages... We heard you the first time... You're wrong, but we heard you. Anything new to contribute?

You saying I am wrong, doesn't make me wrong.

Yes, yes, yes... again, very nice.

But it doesn't speak to your incessant and unimaginative repetition.

Now does it demonstrate anything new to contribute to the conversation.

 

[Victory67]

What a load of elephant shit...

The mad-dog Palestinians have been walled-off to prevent death and injury to Israeli citizens...

As inflicted upon innocent Israelis by Intifada I and II and Gazan rocket-barrage campaigns ever since...

They are now reaping the consequences of their earlier foolishness, intransigence, savagery and barbarism...

They have no one to blame but themselves...

Better luck, next lifetime...

For now, time to slink out of Rump Palestine into some neighboring Arab country in the middle of the night, and build a new life for yourselves, elsewhere...

'Cause the one you're in now is a Dead End...

if it wasn't for Intifada 1, there would have never been any peace talks or a peace treaty with Jordan, nor Palestinian self-rule in the West Bank.

 

[Kondor3]

"...if it wasn't for Intifada 1, there would have never been any peace talks or a peace treaty with Jordan, nor Palestinian self-rule in the West Bank."

Hope it was worth what they're enduring now...

Somehow, I doubt it...

However,,,

'...Palestinian self-rule in the West Bank?"

Oh, good...

And here I'd been thinking that the pro-Palestinian side was claiming that they're Occupied...

But, I mean, if it's self-rule, then the rest is just a false alarm, and no problemo...

 

[Victory67]

Hope it was worth what they're enduring now...

Somehow, I doubt it...

However,,,

'...Palestinian self-rule in the West Bank?"

Oh, good...

And here I'd been thinking that the pro-Palestinian side was claiming that they're Occupied...

But, I mean, if it's self-rule, then the rest is just a false alarm, and no problemo...

One could argue that Area A is not under Israeli Occupation, but it would be a poor argument as Israel controls entry and exit into Area A. As for Area B, Israel certainly the land. And of course Area C.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Harvard students collect testimonies of apartheid from Palestine to US

Wed, 02/26/2014

A Palestinian student from Gaza writes, “I go to the bathroom to get ready for school, but there is no water to wash my face with. A few airstrikes in the morning are common;” while a queer student of color speaks about struggling to find a safe space for himself in the world: “My only option became suffering in isolating silence and living in pretense, sacrificing my life for mere survival in my private and public apartheid.”

For those who believe that our campaign makes “complex” issues too “simple,” let us visit a quote from one of the testimonies: “From Harvard to Palestine, my apartheid exists because people don’t want me to exist.”

Harvard students collect testimonies of apartheid from Palestine to US | The Electronic Intifada

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Settlements unlawful under intl law have been built on lands stolen from Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.

Settlers are governed by civil law and Palestinians in the OPT by military law, this is an Apartheid System.


The International Court of Justice rules the settlements in the OPT that includes East Jerusalem and the West Bank are unlawful.

99. THE UN Security Council declared in resolutions 237 (1967), 271 (1969), 446 (1979), 681 (1990), and 799 (1992) the applicability of the Geneva Conventions (1949) to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. These resolutions also include the Security Council conclusions that the Israeli settlements in those occupied territories are illegal as per article 49, para. 6 of those same Geneva Conventions (1949)

The Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law.Articles 99 & 120 - The Court rulesIsraeli settlements are in violation of international law.

120. In agreement with Security Council resolution 452 (1979) and 465 (1980), "the Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law".

Study Guide: Settlements are illegal

 

[Kondor3]

What does this have to do with Apartheid?

The International Court of Justice rules the settlements in the OPT that includes East Jerusalem and the West Bank are unlawful.

99. THE UN Security Council declared in resolutions 237 (1967), 271 (1969), 446 (1979), 681 (1990), and 799 (1992) the applicability of the Geneva Conventions (1949) to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. These resolutions also include the Security Council conclusions that the Israeli settlements in those occupied territories are illegal as per article 49, para. 6 of those same Geneva Conventions (1949)

The Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law.Articles 99 & 120 - The Court rulesIsraeli settlements are in violation of international law.

120. In agreement with Security Council resolution 452 (1979) and 465 (1980), "the Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law".

Study Guide: Settlements are illegal

 

[Kondor3]

The Electronic Intifada...

People who have no clue what constitutes Apartheid...

Yeah, there's credibility...

Harvard students collect testimonies of apartheid from Palestine to US

Wed, 02/26/2014

A Palestinian student from Gaza writes, “I go to the bathroom to get ready for school, but there is no water to wash my face with. A few airstrikes in the morning are common;” while a queer student of color speaks about struggling to find a safe space for himself in the world: “My only option became suffering in isolating silence and living in pretense, sacrificing my life for mere survival in my private and public apartheid.”

For those who believe that our campaign makes “complex” issues too “simple,” let us visit a quote from one of the testimonies: “From Harvard to Palestine, my apartheid exists because people don’t want me to exist.”

Harvard students collect testimonies of apartheid from Palestine to US | The Electronic Intifada

 

[Bumberclyde]

The International Court of Justice rules the settlements in the OPT that includes East Jerusalem and the West Bank are unlawful.

99. THE UN Security Council declared in resolutions 237 (1967), 271 (1969), 446 (1979), 681 (1990), and 799 (1992) the applicability of the Geneva Conventions (1949) to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. These resolutions also include the Security Council conclusions that the Israeli settlements in those occupied territories are illegal as per article 49, para. 6 of those same Geneva Conventions (1949)

The Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law.Articles 99 & 120 - The Court rulesIsraeli settlements are in violation of international law.

120. In agreement with Security Council resolution 452 (1979) and 465 (1980), "the Court concludes that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law".

Study Guide: Settlements are illegal

Your own government doesn't recognize the world court. Next!

 

[RoccoR]

Victory67, et al,

I thought that Areas "A" - "B" and "C" were covered under the Oslo Accords (Oslo II in particular). MAP

One could argue that Area A is not under Israeli Occupation, but it would be a poor argument as Israel controls entry and exit into Area A. As for Area B, Israel certainly the land. And of course Area C.

(QUESTION)

Is it not subject to the Article V - Permanent Status Negotiations, Oslo I, which is the negotiations now in progress?

The Palestinians are at the Peace Table now. Can they make it work? Can they negotiate in good faith?

Most Respectfully,
R