This Road is for Jews Only. Yes, There is Apartheid in Israel

[Kondor3]

More importantly, they have never said that Apartheid DOES exist, at law, as an actionable offense. At the end of the day, that is all that matters.

You don't know what you are talking about little boy, the Geneva conventions spell it out which is why your ISLAMONAZI lies have no effect. The UN has stated that there is no apartheid, the Hague has stated there is no apartheid, the world has stated there is no apartheid. Yet silly little boys like you know better than all the INTERNATIONAL LAW JUDGES that it is apartheid because you cant understand the law.

The UN has never stated that there is no Apartheid in the West Bank.

The Hague has never stated there is no Apartheid in the West Bank.

You should stop the AshkeNazi lies.

Sent from my HP 7 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Hossfly]

There is no apartheid in the West Bank. Period. Anyone saying there is, is a fantastic liar.

Seperate roads.

Seperate cities, towns, villages.

Discriminatory land confiscation and allocation policies.

Discriminatory curfews and collective punishment.

Discriminatory allocation of resources.

Preventing people from returning to their lands.

Disregarding of the law for Jews and not Arabs.

This is all Apartheid.

If any of those things do occur, it is because the Palihoovians don't act like ordinary civilized people. They need to be domesticated.

 

[Victory67]

More importantly, they have never said that Apartheid DOES exist, at law, as an actionable offense. At the end of the day, that is all that matters.

The decision will be made by the ICC and The Hauge.

But of course if they declare the regime in the West Bank to be one of Apartheid, idiots like you will declare the ICC and The Hague to be Islamonazi anti-Semites.

 

[Victory67]

If any of those things do occur, it is because the Palihoovians don't act like ordinary civilized people. They need to be domesticated.

Viewing the Palestinians as "Untermenschen", as you do, is part of the system of Apartheid in the West Bank.

 

[toastman]

No Apartheid exists, at law.

Otherwise, any of several world bodies would have brought such charges and made them stick.

No such thing has happened.

Charges are forthcoming, if no peace deal is signed.

And who is going to make these changes?

 

[Hossfly]

If any of those things do occur, it is because the Palihoovians don't act like ordinary civilized people. They need to be domesticated.

Viewing the Palestinians as "Untermenschen", as you do, is part of the system of Apartheid in the West Bank.

Sparky, you should live among the Palestinkians for a period to see how they react to normal societal practices.

 

[Bumberclyde]

So when are you giving your land back to the Indians? Or are YOU happy living in an apartheid state where Indians are segregated to reservations?

American Indians can live anywhere they like.

Unlike Palestinians under Israeli rule.

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

U.N. rights envoy points to apartheid in Palestinian areasMon Feb 24, 2014

GENEVA (Reuters) - Israel's policies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip appear to amount to apartheid due to its systematic oppression of the Palestinian people and de facto expropriation of their land, a United Nations investigator said in a report.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA1N19I20140224?irpc=932



OF course there is Apartheid, that is why legal authorities keep releasing legal opinions documenting it.

The Zionist who did not complete the first grade needs to leave the law with those who are lawyers and have expertise with the law.

Then take it up with the P.A. who are in control there and ask them why they institute apartheid. Don't blame Israel for working within the rules detailed in the Geneva conventions.

Israel controls more than 60% of the WB, and has imposed Apartheid there, in contravention of the Geneva Conventions.

No Apartheid exists, at law.

Otherwise, any of several world bodies would have brought such charges and made them stick.

No such thing has happened.

 

[Bumberclyde]

OF course there is Apartheid, that is why legal authorities keep releasing legal opinions documenting it.

The Zionist who did not complete the first grade needs to leave the law with those who are lawyers and have expertise with the law.

Israel controls more than 60% of the WB, and has imposed Apartheid there, in contravention of the Geneva Conventions.

No Apartheid exists, at law.

Otherwise, any of several world bodies would have brought such charges and made them stick.

No such thing has happened.

Guess what? Nobody gives a shit about anything you say. If the asshole Arabs don't like it, they can do like you and pound sand nonstop.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Your claim is false.

Colonialism was not unlawful when struggles with Native Americans and colonists occurred in America.

Further, THE Indians did not even see themselves as owners of the land, they saw God as the owner of the land.

Colonialism is unlawful today under principles of international law.

Apartheid is a crime under international law today and Israel practices Apartheid.

So when are you giving your land back to the Indians? Or are YOU happy living in an apartheid state where Indians are segregated to reservations?

American Indians can live anywhere they like.

Unlike Palestinians under Israeli rule.

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

 

[kucing]

there beautiful people beautiful

 

[Bumberclyde]

Your claim is false.

Colonialism was not unlawful when struggles with Native Americans and colonists occurred in America.

Further, THE Indians did not even see themselves as owners of the land, they saw God as the owner of the land.

Colonialism is unlawful today under principles of international law.

Apartheid is a crime under international law today and Israel practices Apartheid.

American Indians can live anywhere they like.

Unlike Palestinians under Israeli rule.

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

So you can justify your stolen land, but others should give up theirs? You're a ******* hypocrite. Now you know.

 

[Kondor3]

Wake me up when one of those sleaze-bags are sufficiently sure of such things to bring charges at-law.

Until then, it's all 'opinion' by 'special rapporteurs' and such-like useless biased bureaucrats.

Wake me up when charges are filed and when a competent international legal criminal authority finds sufficient grounds to indict and issue warrants and subpoenas.

Until then, it's all smoke and mirrors, and so much dried camel-shit.

U.N. rights envoy points to apartheid in Palestinian areasMon Feb 24, 2014

GENEVA (Reuters) - Israel's policies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip appear to amount to apartheid due to its systematic oppression of the Palestinian people and de facto expropriation of their land, a United Nations investigator said in a report.

U.N. rights envoy points to apartheid in Palestinian areas



OF course there is Apartheid, that is why legal authorities keep releasing legal opinions documenting it.

The Zionist who did not complete the first grade needs to leave the law with those who are lawyers and have expertise with the law.

Israel controls more than 60% of the WB, and has imposed Apartheid there, in contravention of the Geneva Conventions.

No Apartheid exists, at law.

Otherwise, any of several world bodies would have brought such charges and made them stick.

No such thing has happened.

 

[Kondor3]

Your claim is false.

Colonialism was not unlawful when struggles with Native Americans and colonists occurred in America.

Further, THE Indians did not even see themselves as owners of the land, they saw God as the owner of the land.

Colonialism is unlawful today under principles of international law.

Apartheid is a crime under international law today and Israel practices Apartheid.

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

So you can justify your stolen land, but others should give up theirs? You're a ******* hypocrite. Now you know.

Isn't that a hoot?

 

[Victory67]

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

Land conquered in war is not stolen.

Private property confiscated for someone elses use, is stolen.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Your claim is false.

Colonialism was not unlawful when struggles with Native Americans and colonists occurred in America.

Further, THE Indians did not even see themselves as owners of the land, they saw God as the owner of the land.

Colonialism is unlawful today under principles of international law.

Apartheid is a crime under international law today and Israel practices Apartheid.

American Indians can live anywhere they like.

Unlike Palestinians under Israeli rule.

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

What kind of phony justification is that--"They didn't see themselves as owners of the land, they saw G-d as the owner"? They fought the colonists tooth-and-nail. Didn't you ever see a Western movie? Besides, Jews can say the same thing--that G-d gave the Land of Israel to the Jews.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Americans live on stolen land, when are you giving it back to the Indians?

Land conquered in war is not stolen.

Private property confiscated for someone elses use, is stolen.

Well then, Israel conquered the West Bank in the '67 War.

 

[Victory67]

Well then, Israel conquered the West Bank in the '67 War.

well, now there are international laws about these things.

laws that Israel has sworn to uphold and respect.

its now illegal to build housing on land that you won in a war, unless you at least annex the land and reach a peace treaty with the other nation you were at war with.

not so during the 1800s.

 

[Indeependent]

Well then, Israel conquered the West Bank in the '67 War.

well, now there are international laws about these things.

laws that Israel has sworn to uphold and respect.

its now illegal to build housing on land that you won in a war, unless you at least annex the land and reach a peace treaty with the other nation you were at war with.

not so during the 1800s.

You got a point there...keep it there.

 

[Victory67]

Well then, Israel conquered the West Bank in the '67 War.

well, now there are international laws about these things.

laws that Israel has sworn to uphold and respect.

its now illegal to build housing on land that you won in a war, unless you at least annex the land and reach a peace treaty with the other nation you were at war with.

not so during the 1800s.

You got a point there...keep it there.

Meaning what, exactly?