Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,609
- 42,051
- 2,430
“This is worse than 9/11 for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda.
USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income”
USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income”
Thread by @Anc_Aesthetics on Thread Reader App
@Anc_Aesthetics: Talked to a friend who has connections within the Democratic Party and he said the level of panic over Trump and Elon shutting down USAID is unlike anything he’s ever seen. By following the money...…
Talked to a friend who has connections within the Democratic Party and he said the level of panic over Trump and Elon shutting down USAID is unlike anything he’s ever seen.
By following the money DOGE has struck a killing blow to the heart of the Democrat deep state machine.
Direct quote: “This is worse than 9/11 for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda. USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income”
Another text “Based on the reactions from within the party it seems to me that dismantling USAID is Trump’s biggest political victory to date, it was his enemy’s golden goose”
Same source who told me during the campaign (well before it was made public) that Kamala’s internal polling had her behind Trump so his information is good.
Another important addition. He said initial plans by the Democrats is to have their people at USAID hide the partisan funding under “unimpeachable initiatives”. “They will push back really hard on certain line items that on their face look like reasonable USAID expenditures and hide their political spending under these programs”
~Snip~
More: “Another likely solution for Democrats which they already use to reward VIPs is to use NGOs as an intermediary to direct funds where they want them to go”
So basically USAID allocates funds for a certain initiative that looks reasonable. Democrat friendly NGO is contracted to carry out initiative. NGO #1 subcontracts “VIP” which is another NGO owned/operated by a political ally or Democrat politician. Eventually the funds reach the secret intended target and the original problem is not solved. This means they can continue to rinse and repeat this grift.
See More: x.com
Commentary:
A lot of lifelong Marxist Democrats are starting to learn that the Democratic Party is not what they thought it was and are asking for their cut.
Chalk a big win for Trump and DOGE. This is going to hurt the Democrats badly.
It's no wonder that they are all up in the air about this cut.
Who is next? Will it be the Dept. of Labor?