This is why only idiots talk about succession

[LeroyDumonde]

You probably shouldn't act like the smartest person in the room when you don't know the difference between secession and succession.

 

[whitehall]

MTG never stood in the way of relief funding. This is left wing spin from some progressive rag with the socialist name of "The New Republic". The freaking Country is going down the drain under a mental defective and a giggling idiot and lefties worry about a single republican congresswoman.

 

[you can't hurt ham]

Be that as it may you haven't answered my question.
Do you need me to now spell the correct word for you in order to assist with this apparent reading comprehension issue you are struggling with?
Even an average reader can usually infer the intended meaning of most text even when spelling errors and/or word substitutions occur.
This does not seem to be the case with you.
Let me help you.

The INCORRECT word I used in this thread title was
SUCCESSION: noun
1a: the order in which or the conditions under which one person after another succeeds to a property, dignity, title, or throne
b: the right of a person or line to succeed
c: the line having such a right

2a : the act or process of following in order : sequence
b(1): the act or process of one person's taking the place of another in the enjoyment of or liability for rights or duties or both
(2)
: the act or process of a person's becoming beneficially entitled to a property or property interest of a deceased person
c
: the continuance of corporate personality
d
: unidirectional change in the composition of an ecosystem as the available competing organisms and especially the plants respond to and modify the environment

3a: a number of persons or things that follow each other in sequence
b: a group, type, or series that succeeds or displaces another

when in fact the word I SHOULD have used was
SECESSION:
1: withdrawal into privacy or solitude : retirement

2: formal withdrawal from an organization

So now that we are clear that yes, I do know the difference between these two words but I just made an error in typing too quickly last night and mispelled the word I intended to use......let's get back to the subject:
It is ridiculous for people like MTG (and others) to constantly badmouth and want to shut down in a cheap political stunt, the very federal government that she (and they) are now running to begging for handouts.

Oh, NOW he familiarizes himself with the word.

 

[MagicMike]

Oh, NOW he familiarizes himself with the word.

Deflection much?

 

[you can't hurt ham]

Deflection much?

Yes, you do.

 

[22lcidw]

Yawn...

There will be no secession of any State from the Union anytime soon...

It was tried once before, 163-164 years ago, and it did not end well for the separatists...

And, given how much blood and treasure that even those former separatist-States have poured in the Union since then...

The vast majority of Americans realize that we are vastly stronger and safer, bound together, than breaking the Union apart...

We have our share of problems that pi$$ people off, nolo contendre, but in the balance and in the final analysis...

Most Americans would rather be part of our transcontinental Union than to splinter-off into States and City-Statelets...

The blathering of today's so-called secessionists can be relegated to the realm of conspiracy kooks and political re-tards...

You really want to put that to the test? We are already split. It's just semantics. For your system to have a chance to work, you must eliminate religion. Particularly Christians. You have done a good amount of progress on that in the last half century. We see the propaganda day after day, and it is massive smearing on steroids. It is weakened now with corruption instilled in some denominations. There are points to Progressive Socialist agendas. It is the excesses of what pure power has turned them into that is as severe as any Christian who promotes excesses according to their manmade doctrine and not the creator.

 

[Kondor3]

You really want to put that to the test?

Yes. Please try.

We are already split.

Not really... once you eliminate the two-forked viper we call the Mainstream Media.

It's just semantics. For your system to have a chance to work, you must eliminate religion. Particularly Christians. You have done a good amount of progress on that in the last half century. We see the propaganda day after day, and it is massive smearing on steroids. It is weakened now with corruption instilled in some denominations. There are points to Progressive Socialist agendas. It is the excesses of what pure power has turned them into that is as severe as any Christian who promotes excesses according to their manmade doctrine and not the creator.

You are a MAGAtt Nut-job... there will be no secession nor second civil war... not gonna happen.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I hear it all the time, especially from Texans. But in reality it could be from any redneck in any other southern state. But then again I have heard it in Utah and Idaho.
"We don't need no fed! We'd be better off without a cenralized federal gub-mint."
Yeah sucker, until the next Cat-4 hurricane comes ashore in your state....then suddenly a national federation looks pretty damned good doesn't it, especially when it comes to asking for help....i.e. MONEY?

Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene is begging the federal government to urgently “send the funds” to help the American southeast recover in the wake of Hurricane Helene, even though she herself stood in the way of eemergency relief funds just last week.

Hypocrite MTG Now Demanding Hurricane Relief Funds She Tried to Block

Marjorie Taylor Greene is suddenly all for government spending.

newrepublic.com

Republicans are infamous for their hypocrisy.