This is What We Are Up Against

[BS Filter]

I love this guy. This is the trash that hates the average American. They are among us on this forum.

 

[IM2]

You are part of the trash who hates the average American.

 

[BS Filter]

You are part of the trash who hates the average American.

You've developed brain damage from habitually inhaling your own farts.

 

[Stryder50]

You are part of the trash who hates the average American.

Yet you are the trash that accuses average Americans of being racist.

 

[sparky]

did i miss something? somehow advocating gender diversity is now white supremacy ??

~S~

 

[IM2]

You've developed brain damage from habitually inhaling your own farts.

You are one of the people who hate the average American. That is a fact.

 

[BS Filter]

You are one of the people who hate the average American. That is a fact.

You're irrelevant. Take your nasty racist black ass to Somalia.

 

[Stryder50]

I love this guy. This is the trash that hates the average American. They are among us on this forum.

While being the trash that $uck$ their support off of the American taxpayers.
Dodging the answer is clear sign of guilt.

 

[forkup]

While being the trash that $uck$ their support off of the American taxpayers.
Dodging the answer is clear sign of guilt.

Is it? Is that your final answer?

 

[toobfreak]

This is What We Are Up Against​

This is the trash that hates the average American. They are among us on this forum.

Seriously, this is nothing new. Her type of response to any sort of questioning or clarification at all of her many rogue and rash statements whether current or in the past is the exact same type of evasive, dodging responses I get here every day just trying to discuss anything on this group, with a tard.

They say whatever the hell they want making all sorts of outlandish and exaggerated claims as fact while providing zilch in the way of any supporting evidence, then when you try to get any sort of direct, straight answer back out of them just to clarify what they mean, they act like you are the IRS trying to pin them down for a federal crime.

 

[BS Filter]

Is it? Is that your final answer?

Yes.

 

[BS Filter]

Seriously, this is nothing new. Her type of response to any sort of questioning or clarification at all of her many rogue and rash statements whether current or in the past is the exact same type of evasive, dodging responses I get here every day just trying to discuss anything on this group, with a tard.

They say whatever the hell they want making all sorts of outlandish and exaggerated claims as fact while providing zilch in the way of any supporting evidence, then when you try to get any sort of direct, straight answer back out of them just to clarify what they mean, they act like you are the IRS trying to pin them down for a federal crime.

They're trash. Gutless nasty trash.

 

[forkup]

Yes.

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.

www.nbcnews.com

Guilty right?

FCC quickly edits website after pro-Trump chair claims it’s not an independent agency

‘Congress long ago determined that the FCC is an independent expert agency,’ FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who now says the agency is not independent, said in 2018.

www.independent.co.uk

Guilty right?

Federal Judge Criticizes Government for Failing to Produce Evidence That Might Have Freed Kilmar Abrego Garcia – We Are Casa

wearecasa.org

When pressed by Judge Xinis and defense attorneys, Cantú repeatedly answered “I don’t know” to basic questions about his own sworn statement.

Guilty right?

US justice department will not release all Epstein files by deadline, official says

The Friday deadline was mandated by a bill that got near-unanimous support in the US Congress.

www.bbc.com

Guilty right?


You sure you want to stick with that answer?

 

[BS Filter]

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.

www.nbcnews.com

Guilty right?

FCC quickly edits website after pro-Trump chair claims it’s not an independent agency

‘Congress long ago determined that the FCC is an independent expert agency,’ FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who now says the agency is not independent, said in 2018.

www.independent.co.uk

Guilty right?

Federal Judge Criticizes Government for Failing to Produce Evidence That Might Have Freed Kilmar Abrego Garcia – We Are Casa

wearecasa.org

When pressed by Judge Xinis and defense attorneys, Cantú repeatedly answered “I don’t know” to basic questions about his own sworn statement.

Guilty right?

US justice department will not release all Epstein files by deadline, official says

The Friday deadline was mandated by a bill that got near-unanimous support in the US Congress.

www.bbc.com

Guilty right?


You sure you want to stick with that answer?

What's your point?

 

[toobfreak]

They're trash. Gutless nasty trash.

That's putting it very nicely.

 

[BS Filter]

That's putting it very nicely.

I'm a nice guy. Thanks.

 

[forkup]

What's your point?

Simply a question. Do you still believe that dodging or refusing to answer questions means someone is guilty, after the examples I gave?

If you do, that’s a consistent position, but it also commits you to saying that Trump is a pedophile, that he committed fraud on a large scale, and that the executive branch is lying to both the judicial and legislative branches.

I’m pointing out what your rule logically entails if applied consistently.

In that context, your implication that you found a director of a non-profit who, by your logic, would be a white supremacist, pales in comparison to the other implications of that standard.

 

[BS Filter]

Simply a question. Do you still believe that dodging or refusing to answer questions means someone is guilty, after the examples I gave?

If you do, that’s a consistent position, but it also commits you to saying that Trump is a pedophile, that he committed fraud on a large scale, and that the executive branch is lying to both the judicial and legislative branches.

I’m pointing out what your rule logically entails if applied consistently.

In that context, your implication that you found a director of a non-profit who, by your logic, would be a white supremacist, pales in comparison to the other implications of that standard.

He repeated her own words to her. President Trump has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.

 

[BS Filter]

Look at this stupid lying hood rat.

 

[forkup]

He repeated her own words to her. President Trump has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.

So you're refusing to answer the question? That's interesting. So did the woman. And I recall, she repeated she was there to talk about her non-profit not herself about a dozen times. Something you interpret as an admission of guilt.

You're absolutely certain that refusing to answer questions implies guilt?