- Banned
- #61
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Repeated by one of our many fascist and tyrant supporters.The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Spoken by the main practitioner of such on this forum.Never let the facts get in the way of an irrational narrative.
Has nothing to do with one of your prize leaders calling half the nation a basket full of deplorables ....I reckon most wars are like that. Well, they started it.
Trump doesn't have anywhere near the ability to unify or lead the nation. Any words of his would be hollow, now that he has chosen sides and said that anyone who isn't in the cult is the enemy. So he's just doing what he always does.
A. Because he was a private citizen and not a public officialYou happen to look into the house resolution condemning the Hortman and related killings which passed unanimously in bipartisan fashion?
Charlie Kirk's resolution didn't quite pass in the same manner.
Why's that?
He was never hateful. You people are the hateful ones. You hated what he had to say because it exposed you as the bad guys.A. Because he was a private citizen and not a public official
B. He was a hateful divisive figure
I assume this is what it was like during the McCarthy era. They don't even know what the word means. For them, it just means someone who holds any individual views to the Left of theirs. It lets them take their miserable lives out on someone else."This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way,"
1) so was Dr KingA. Because he was a private citizen and not a public official
B. He was a hateful divisive figure
MLK was not hateful and only divisive to racists1) so was Dr King
2) yall said the same thing about him.
Demklan gonna klan
Dems like u called him hateful and a disruptiveMLK was not hateful and only divisive to racists
Comparing him to this POS is repugnant
Resolutions aren't only for politicians. One getting unanimous bipartisan support and the other not so from the hateful left.A. Because he was a private citizen and not a public official
B. He was a hateful divisive figure
You are repugnant. You have to lie about what Charlie said to have any point at all. The video's you refer to are all heavily edited to make him sound like you want.MLK was not hateful and only divisive to racists
Comparing him to this POS is repugnant
Guess you haven't heard about his sexual escapades with female staff?MLK was not hateful and only divisive to racists
Digging pretty deep to defend yourself hereGuess you haven't heard about his sexual escapades with female staff?
You already dug your hole, simp.Digging pretty deep to defend yourself here
It's true.Digging pretty deep to defend yourself here
It’s also irrelevantIt's true.