This is what happens to black "conservatives" when they face black people.
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
- Mar 11, 2015
- 101,625
- 111,646
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #42
What we don't accept is the anti black ideology of the Republican party. Only a black idiot would be part of it.
Last edited:
- Mar 11, 2015
- 101,625
- 111,646
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #43
Liberals have gone on conservative shows. But they get talked over and yelled at. The bellly of the beast is Fox. This guy walked in there and got carved up because what he believes is bullshit as it pertains to blacks. Why you even try discussing this with a numbskull like JGalt only shows that you refuse to accept that the shit you guys REALLY believe is wrong for black people.
You can stop pretending that race is irrelevant. This video is evidence of the reasn why blacks refuse to join the republican party. When that guy was questioned he evaded answering. But you couldn't watch the whole thing because yu woud have seen the problem with black Republicans.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
INTERESTING: Even on a political thread, Isaac can't even type one sentence without bringing up race.
Race, race, race, race.
Everything is either black or white.
Meanwhile, conservatives seldom go on liberal shows because:
- They are never invited.
- They are just attacked and shouted down, not allowed to get even one thought out complete.
- Dec 16, 2017
- 18,116
- 9,073
- 1,140
What anti black ideology? Show me this? Where is it?
You forget, I listen to both left and right wing talk radio, you almost never hear the right wing hosts bringing up race unless it’s a headline. You know who talks about race every chance they get? The left wing talk hosts.
Seems they are the ones most obsessed with race. Republicans generally don’t care, unless you make it an issue, then they push back because blacks and democrats always go on the attack with it. Face it, “racism” has been made into a weapon…and white folk are probably just sick and tired of it.
- Dec 16, 2017
- 18,116
- 9,073
- 1,140
Exactly, which is what you have here.
Sure, he went onto a left wing talk show and got bullied by the host…you say “carved up” when really all it was was Martin doing what YOU do, just dismissing any counter argument.
What is it you think I believe about black people?
No, I said racism isn’t around every corner like you would have us believe.
I agree, because people like Martin always playing the part of the race baiter, always filling the minds of people like you, with false narratives.
Martin, like you, would have every black person believe that all whiteys are part of the klan, and are out to opppress black people.
Sure, happens all the time. Hosts usually ask some very specific questions designed to get people in a “gotcha” moment. Again, post some of these videos of liberals going on conservative shows, you’ll see the same thing.
No, I didn’t watch the whole thing because I didn’t want to waste 35 minutes listening to the same old story I hear every day on progressive radio.
I already know his schtick…whiteys are bad blacks are good, republicans are the source of every problem in the country today…yadda yadda yadda…. I’m right, right?
- Banned
- #51
Let it go. The reparations train has left the station.No, that is not a fact. My father and mother lived together until my father died bitch. Did you say smething about welfare white boy?
Mothers' pensions
Mothers' pensions, also referred to as mothers' aid or widows' aid, were cash payments distributed to impoverished single mothers in the United States during the first three decades of the 20th century. Introduced during the Progressive Era, they were among the earliest components of the modern American welfare state and were the first public cash assistance programs targeted to single mothers.
Mother's pensions were aimed at family preservation, intending to provide the means for poor single mothers to care for their children in their own homes. While primarily targeted at widows, they were also sometimes authorized for women whose husbands had deserted them, were confined to mental hospitals or prisons, or were physically or mentally incapacitated. They were financed and administered by state and local governments, and served as a precursor to the federal Aid to Dependent Children program created by the Social Security Act of 1935
Mothers' pensions - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Aid to Deoendent Children or Title IV of the Social Security Act gave grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. The name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children IN THE 1960'S. This was welfare. Assistance for single moms with children and NO FATHER at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Aid to Dependent Children functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states with Mothers’ Pension laws that began in 1910.
The ADC plan was written by two ladies who had been former directors of what was at the time called the U.S. Children’s Bureau. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers had no support from a husband no matter how they got into that position. Exclusively, Whites, specifically single white unwed women, got what is now called welfare from 1910 until 1965."
You are ignorant of your own history white boy. It is unwise for you to try arguing with somebody who knows it better than you. Your dumb ass racist comments do not defeat the truth that I have. It is documented. Whites are the kings and queens of crime and handouts. 13 percent of the population are not committing 50 percent of the crimes. 1.09 percent of the American population are 51 percent of the criminal offenders and they are not black. They look just like your pasty white ass.
FACT!
Linda Gordon and Felice Batlan, The Legal History of the Aid to Dependent Children Program, Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History
Brad Plumer, A second look at Social Security’s racist origins, Washington Post, June 3, 2013, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...cond-look-at-social-securitys-racist-origins/
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Offenders by Race and Ethnicity, 2020, https://www.fbi.gov/ news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2020-incident- based-data
JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 79,254
- 102,486
- 3,635
How much money does the world have to sink into Haiti until they become a productive country like the Dominican Republic?
There's your answer.
Just stop phukn and crapping out children with no fathers with money chutes promoting it. This was the same a half century ago. Realize it. Realize truth personally. It will end. Asians will get their revenge on us.Here is one thing we are owed for.
This paper examines the U.S. government’s instigation, participation, authorization, and perpetuation of federal housing discrimination against black Americans from the 1930s to the 1980s and the damage that such discrimination caused and continues to cause today. Delving into the U.S. government’s twentieth century federal housing practices, this paper discusses how the government effectively barred black-Americans from obtaining quality housing and from investing in housing as wealth, while simultaneously subsidizing and endorsing white homeownership, white suburbs, and white wealth. Quantifying the U.S. government’s discriminatory practices with current wealth gaps between white- and black-American communities, this paper discusses the effects of twentieth century federal housing discrimination and argues that such government-initiated wrongs justify black reparations.
Part I examines the U.S. government’s housing practices—from the New Deal until the 1968 Fair Housing Act and its 1988 Amendments—to reveal that although the New Deal’s national housing programs revolutionized homeownership and home equity in the United States, the U.S. government’s federal housing programs were racially discriminatory. Specifically, and quite shockingly, the U.S. government actively created and promulgated racist neighborhood rating systems that constructed black neighborhoods and black property as unstable, volatile, hazardous, and not worthy of investment. Using these racist rating systems, the federal government endorsed racial covenants and invested federal money into the creation and accumulation of white wealth, the value of whiteness, white suburbia, and white homeownership. Meanwhile, the government denied blacks federal housing funding, fueling black stigma and barring black-Americans from the invaluable twentieth century opportunities of homeownership and home equity.
Understanding the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices, Part II discusses and quantifies the effects of the government’s housing discrimination on black-American households and communities. Finding that approximately 120 billion 1950s dollars—or more than 1.239 quintillion 2019 dollars—were invested to subsidize and create white-American wealth through homeownership, Part II discusses both the quantifiable and the less quantifiable effects of twentieth century federal housing discrimination. Mapping the impact of the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices to the black-white wealth gap, Part II argues that the black-white wealth gap may be attributable, at least in part, to twentieth century federal housing discrimination.
In conclusion, this paper argues in favor of black reparations for the discriminatory U.S. housing practices that persisted from the 1930s to the 1980s—and whose remnants pervasively continue to damage black-American communities today. At a minimum, this paper argues that the U.S. government should compensate black Americans for the 1.239 quintillion dollars of discriminatory federal housing spending. In addition, recognizing the power of wealth accumulation, the U.S. government should consider the grave and lasting impact of its discriminatory housing practices in order to repair the government-initiated wrongs perpetrated merely one generation ago. While black reparations for federal housing discrimination do not speak to or cure the issues of reparations for slavery in the United States, such reparations are one step forward in correcting past wrongs that continue to devastate black-American communities and will continue to haunt our country, if left unrepaired.
And it has nothing to do with 150 years ago, although others have been given what they were owed for things that happened 150 years ago. But here is another one.
Citygroup did a study focusing on U.S. GDP from 2000 until 2020. The study revealed huge losses in GDP due to continuing discrimination against blacks in business revenue, education, housing credit, and income.
“Closing the Black racial wage gap 20 years ago might have provided an additional $2.7 trillion in income available for consumption and investment.
Improving access to housing credit might have added an additional 770,000 Black homeowners over the last 20 years, with combined sales and expenditures adding another $218 billion to GDP over that time.
Facilitating increased access to higher education (college, graduate, and vocational schools) for Black students might have bolstered lifetime incomes that in aggregate sums to $90 to $113 billion.
Providing fair and equitable lending to Black entrepreneurs might have resulted in the creation of an additional $13 trillion in business revenue over the last 20 years. This could have been used for investments in labor, technology, capital equipment, and structures and 6.1 million jobs might have been created per year.”
That sixteen trillion dollars lost from 2000 until this moment amounts to 800 billion dollars in lost GDP per year.
Closing the Racial Inequality Gaps
Our ambition in this report is for this analysis to bring sober perspective as well as hope to our readers as we collectively find substantive and sustainable opportunities to address the gaps we identify.www.citigroup.com
So right now white racism has cost blacks 23.2 trilion dolars in THIS CENTURY. So we aren't talking about 150 years ago, and your punk ass knows it. It is evil to have done what whites have done to us then try twisting yourselves up inventing reasons why you cannot do what is right. This is another reason why some blacks call whites devils.
So ets do the math, shall we?
We are owed $485,355.36 cents EACH in THIS CENTURY for what whites continue doing. So you and every other racist can talk your psychosis rddled bullshit that allows you to deny everything you have been given, but if your race doesnot do what is right, there is going to be a punishment and it's goingto come from a higher power than I, you, or anyone else has. You don't want that, I guarantee. So you can continue to be arrogant and laugh or talk your racist bs, but when the hammer drops on your white asses, just remember that you were warned.
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
Here is one thing we are owed for.
This paper examines the U.S. government’s instigation, participation, authorization, and perpetuation of federal housing discrimination against black Americans from the 1930s to the 1980s and the damage that such discrimination caused and continues to cause today. Delving into the U.S. government’s twentieth century federal housing practices, this paper discusses how the government effectively barred black-Americans from obtaining quality housing and from investing in housing as wealth, while simultaneously subsidizing and endorsing white homeownership, white suburbs, and white wealth. Quantifying the U.S. government’s discriminatory practices with current wealth gaps between white- and black-American communities, this paper discusses the effects of twentieth century federal housing discrimination and argues that such government-initiated wrongs justify black reparations.
Part I examines the U.S. government’s housing practices—from the New Deal until the 1968 Fair Housing Act and its 1988 Amendments—to reveal that although the New Deal’s national housing programs revolutionized homeownership and home equity in the United States, the U.S. government’s federal housing programs were racially discriminatory. Specifically, and quite shockingly, the U.S. government actively created and promulgated racist neighborhood rating systems that constructed black neighborhoods and black property as unstable, volatile, hazardous, and not worthy of investment. Using these racist rating systems, the federal government endorsed racial covenants and invested federal money into the creation and accumulation of white wealth, the value of whiteness, white suburbia, and white homeownership. Meanwhile, the government denied blacks federal housing funding, fueling black stigma and barring black-Americans from the invaluable twentieth century opportunities of homeownership and home equity.
Understanding the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices, Part II discusses and quantifies the effects of the government’s housing discrimination on black-American households and communities. Finding that approximately 120 billion 1950s dollars—or more than 1.239 quintillion 2019 dollars—were invested to subsidize and create white-American wealth through homeownership, Part II discusses both the quantifiable and the less quantifiable effects of twentieth century federal housing discrimination. Mapping the impact of the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices to the black-white wealth gap, Part II argues that the black-white wealth gap may be attributable, at least in part, to twentieth century federal housing discrimination.
In conclusion, this paper argues in favor of black reparations for the discriminatory U.S. housing practices that persisted from the 1930s to the 1980s—and whose remnants pervasively continue to damage black-American communities today. At a minimum, this paper argues that the U.S. government should compensate black Americans for the 1.239 quintillion dollars of discriminatory federal housing spending. In addition, recognizing the power of wealth accumulation, the U.S. government should consider the grave and lasting impact of its discriminatory housing practices in order to repair the government-initiated wrongs perpetrated merely one generation ago. While black reparations for federal housing discrimination do not speak to or cure the issues of reparations for slavery in the United States, such reparations are one step forward in correcting past wrongs that continue to devastate black-American communities and will continue to haunt our country, if left unrepaired.
And it has nothing to do with 150 years ago, although others have been given what they were owed for things that happened 150 years ago. But here is another one.
Citygroup did a study focusing on U.S. GDP from 2000 until 2020. The study revealed huge losses in GDP due to continuing discrimination against blacks in business revenue, education, housing credit, and income.
“Closing the Black racial wage gap 20 years ago might have provided an additional $2.7 trillion in income available for consumption and investment.
Improving access to housing credit might have added an additional 770,000 Black homeowners over the last 20 years, with combined sales and expenditures adding another $218 billion to GDP over that time.
Facilitating increased access to higher education (college, graduate, and vocational schools) for Black students might have bolstered lifetime incomes that in aggregate sums to $90 to $113 billion.
Providing fair and equitable lending to Black entrepreneurs might have resulted in the creation of an additional $13 trillion in business revenue over the last 20 years. This could have been used for investments in labor, technology, capital equipment, and structures and 6.1 million jobs might have been created per year.”
That sixteen trillion dollars lost from 2000 until this moment amounts to 800 billion dollars in lost GDP per year.Closing the Racial Inequality Gaps
Our ambition in this report is for this analysis to bring sober perspective as well as hope to our readers as we collectively find substantive and sustainable opportunities to address the gaps we identify.
So right now white racism has cost blacks 23.2 trilion dolars in THIS CENTURY. So we aren't talking about 150 years ago, and your punk ass knows it. It is evil to have done what whites have done to us then try twisting yourselves up inventing reasons why you cannot do what is right. This is another reason why some blacks call whites devils.
So ets do the math, shall we?
We are owed $485,355.36 cents EACH in THIS CENTURY for what whites continue doing. So you and every other racist can talk your psychosis rddled bullshit that allows you to deny everything you have been given, but if your race doesnot do what is right, there is going to be a punishment and it's goingto come from a higher power than I, you, or anyone else has. You don't want that, I guarantee. So you can continue to be arrogant and laugh or talk your racist bs, but when the hammer drops on your white asses, just remember that you were warned.
Lol, you're not getting one dime. You're one of the leech types that destroy the country.
MarathonMike
Diamond Member
IM2 alienates everyone with his diatribe. Even the other Black USMB members have backed away from him. He is literally the guy on the street corner waiving his arms yelling at the air.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Until 2265.
Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 26,898
- 19,356
- 2,405
Mortimer
Gold Member
If i did something wrong or accussed and perceived of doing something wrong, then whites would be against me, and the bros would support me or generally POC.
RhodyPatriot
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2022
- 19,349
- 26,358
- 2,288
You're talking to yourself again.
And everyone knows you're not black.
Unless "Black" means "mentally ill".
In which case?
You're blacker than black.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Masked thugs brutally beat, rob uniformed NYPD cop in brazen attack- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
Here is where the USA has been headed, until Trump- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 13
-
