At this point if they don't have actual proof, I mean real proof, enough proof to drop on the desk of the supreme court with confidence then I don't believe it.
It's always the build up, but never a pay off.
If they have undisputable proof then fine, let's have it. But if it's just more talk about bombshells then Ive heard enough.
When information is withheld that could supply that evidence that could be provided and clear everything up? The resistance to transparency screams guilt.
I mean I get it. If there was no theft then why not just say "here is everything, show us what we did wrong". This whole thing could have been settled very easily if they just opened up the books so to speak.
But I also realize politics between parties right now is also a pissing contest. No one side wants to concede or help the other, everything has to Be their way or no way, everything is resistance against the other. It's all just wanting to be against the other side anyway they can even if it means abandoning consideration, rationality and common sense.
So I don't know what happened in reality and if it was stolen then let's have it, show us the proof but all this endless talking about the theft is just growing tiresome. Or who knows, maybe that's the game, to stall things so long that everyone just gives up on looking for what happened. Then again, maybe it isn't.