They are yet there is a procedure to navigate to be able to have audits and those audits have to be performed by certified and licensed people not from some Ninja who is looking for bamboo paper...At this point if they don't have actual proof, I mean real proof, enough proof to drop on the desk of the supreme court with confidence then I don't believe it.
It's always the build up, but never a pay off.
If they have undisputable proof then fine, let's have it. But if it's just more talk about bombshells then Ive heard enough.
I don't know if there was fraud or not. I do know that there is a lack of transparency. How can one present you with evidence when they're not permitted to look at the evidence?