This is how stupid smart guns are....from the Department of Justice...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,975
52,248
2,290
These are the specs the Department of Justice has released for any smart gun that will be used by federal law enforcement...you can't make up this stupidity...only the government can....

this one in particular is pretty stupid......I thought the whole point was that the smart gun would only shoot for the person it is supposed to own it.....

DOJ Smart Gun Specs are Telling

4.18.12 If the security device malfunctions, it shall default to a state to allow the pistol to fire.

Can anyone else explain to the anti-gunners here why this is stupid....and negates the whole reason for a smart gun?

The rest of the specs simply point out......don't use a smart gun....
 
Are you assuming that the security device will always malfunction? Can anyone else here explain to 2aguy here what that is stupid?
 
Are you assuming that the security device will always malfunction? Can anyone else here explain to 2aguy here what that is stupid?


moron....the whole point is so the gun cannot be used by anyone but the owner.....if a smart gun is stolen, you will essentially make it work for anyone by making it malfunction...defeating the whole purpose of the smart gun.....
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?
 
Law enforcement unions need to stop this insanity before their people are forced to carry this crap....
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.
the ops obsession with guns , no, no mental health issues there :eusa_whistle:
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.
the ops obsession with guns , no, no mental health issues there :eusa_whistle:

He's a fool, and I heard he smells funny.
 
These are the specs the Department of Justice has released for any smart gun that will be used by federal law enforcement...you can't make up this stupidity...only the government can....

this one in particular is pretty stupid......I thought the whole point was that the smart gun would only shoot for the person it is supposed to own it.....

DOJ Smart Gun Specs are Telling

4.18.12 If the security device malfunctions, it shall default to a state to allow the pistol to fire.

Can anyone else explain to the anti-gunners here why this is stupid....and negates the whole reason for a smart gun?

The rest of the specs simply point out......don't use a smart gun....

Hey shit for brains, all modern electronics that act as a control are designed to fail in the on position. That way, whatever is being controlled will continue to operate.
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.

huh? he pretty much slapped you down, his question is valid
 
These are the specs the Department of Justice has released for any smart gun that will be used by federal law enforcement...you can't make up this stupidity...only the government can....

this one in particular is pretty stupid......I thought the whole point was that the smart gun would only shoot for the person it is supposed to own it.....

DOJ Smart Gun Specs are Telling

4.18.12 If the security device malfunctions, it shall default to a state to allow the pistol to fire.

Can anyone else explain to the anti-gunners here why this is stupid....and negates the whole reason for a smart gun?

The rest of the specs simply point out......don't use a smart gun....

Hey shit for brains, all modern electronics that act as a control are designed to fail in the on position. That way, whatever is being controlled will continue to operate.

You absolute dumbfuk, most fail safes are in the off position, try and know something before posting

Examples: Nuclear weapons and reactors, rocket motors, lawn mowers, elevators, ....
 
Are you assuming that the security device will always malfunction? Can anyone else here explain to 2aguy here what that is stupid?

slow one, he is saying all one has to do is disable the security and gun will fire, which contradicts the entire point of having it in the first place

4.18.1 Pistols shall have an integrated “lock-out” security device as a permanent part of the pistol that disables the firing mechanism except when in the control of authorized individuals.
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.

huh? he pretty much slapped you down, his question is valid

Again, He's too dumb to bother with.
 
Well make up your mind, dumb ass. Your biggest whine has been that they might malfunction and leave a cop with a gun that won't shoot. That was a direct response to that complaint.


Then why make them smart guns in the first place dumb ass..........why go through all the fucking hassle and added expense if they default to working the way they did before you fucked with them.....?

You're just too dumb to bother with.

huh? he pretty much slapped you down, his question is valid

Again, He's too dumb to bother with.

you stop on by, make a point that gets refuted, then claim he is too dumb to bother with

I don't get it, that's how you handle losing the argument?
 
These are the specs the Department of Justice has released for any smart gun that will be used by federal law enforcement...you can't make up this stupidity...only the government can....

this one in particular is pretty stupid......I thought the whole point was that the smart gun would only shoot for the person it is supposed to own it.....

DOJ Smart Gun Specs are Telling

4.18.12 If the security device malfunctions, it shall default to a state to allow the pistol to fire.

Can anyone else explain to the anti-gunners here why this is stupid....and negates the whole reason for a smart gun?

The rest of the specs simply point out......don't use a smart gun....

Hey shit for brains, all modern electronics that act as a control are designed to fail in the on position. That way, whatever is being controlled will continue to operate.

You absolute dumbfuk, most fail safes are in the off position, try and know something before posting

Examples: Nuclear weapons and reactors, rocket motors, lawn mowers, elevators, ....

You stupid motherfucker. You're mistaking internal limits and safety's that are by design meant to take offline, shutdown, any equipment that will fail if left online.
 

Forum List

Back
Top