This explains our current parties pretty well

Before the "big govt" of FDR, the nation had deep recessions on a regular basis (at least one per decade). The period of 1880's to the 1930's were notable for the booms and the busts

Big govt has not eliminated economic instability, but it has done a far better job of reducing the instability than small govt has

You realize that the "busts" served and important purpose of eliminating the waste and corruption in the economy don't you? See they happen because people are dishonest with their business practices or they become lazy and expect to be compensating for something that isn't worth much.

The busts help us refocus, realign, and repent of our corruption and work harder.
 
I don't know about anyone else here but every job I worked I collected a salary as compensation and I went home.

The owner of the company takes the bigger risk in this relationship and therefore DESERVES the lion share of the profit that the company realizes....I can't make it any simpler

Is it the responsibility or duty of the owner to take all the risk and hand over ALL the profit to the employees.

This argument that the people that produce in this country need to give everything away to satisfy the left in wanting those that do nothing in life to be rewarded...I will never understand that kind of life.

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003 (TruthAndPolitics.org)

what many consider some of the best years in the US the tax rate for these people was 70 to 90+%.

Dont buy the lies
 
Before the "big govt" of FDR, the nation had deep recessions on a regular basis (at least one per decade). The period of 1880's to the 1930's were notable for the booms and the busts

Big govt has not eliminated economic instability, but it has done a far better job of reducing the instability than small govt has

You realize that the "busts" served and important purpose of eliminating the waste and corruption in the economy don't you? See they happen because people are dishonest with their business practices or they become lazy and expect to be compensating for something that isn't worth much.

The busts help us refocus, realign, and repent of our corruption and work harder.

WHO the **** is this US you talk about?


There was efectively NO middle class in those years.

Joe dokes get hosed every couple of years and had to start over again.

We got a middle class by stablizing the economy with the likes of Glass steagal.

Now that its gone you see the middleclass shrinking.

A finacially secure population buys shit you fool.
 
Two Santa Clauses or How The Republican Party Has Conned America for Thirty Years


1974, Jude Wanniski had had enough. The Democrats got to play Santa Claus when they passed out Social Security and Unemployment checks – both programs of the New Deal – as well as when their "big government" projects like roads, bridges, and highways were built giving a healthy union paycheck to construction workers. They kept raising taxes on businesses and rich people to pay for things, which didn't seem to have much effect at all on working people (wages were steadily going up, in fact), and that made them seem like a party of Robin Hoods, taking from the rich to fund programs for the poor and the working class. Americans loved it. And every time Republicans railed against these programs, they lost elections.

Everybody understood at the time that economies are driven by demand. People with good jobs have money in their pockets, and want to use it to buy things. The job of the business community is to either determine or drive that demand to their particular goods, and when they're successful at meeting the demand then factories get built, more people become employed to make more products, and those newly-employed people have a paycheck that further increases demand.

Wanniski decided to turn the classical world of economics – which had operated on this simple demand-driven equation for seven thousand years – on its head. In 1974 he invented a new phrase – "supply side economics" – and suggested that the reason economies grew wasn't because people had money and wanted to buy things with it but, instead, because things were available for sale, thus tantalizing people to part with their money. The more things there were, the faster the economy would grow.

You're richer than I am you have more than me, give me my money you stole from me.
 
I will gladly pay more taxes on anything I make over 250,000 this year.

The first 250,000 I make I will pay the same as you do on your 30,000.

That seems fair to me.

You see its hard but I could scrape by on just 249,000 this year.
 
Bubbles are really INVESTOR INFLATION, folks.

They represent investors driving up the price of investments beyond their ability to return a decent profit.

And they happen when the SUPPLY SIDE has too much money and the DEMAND SIDE has so little that the investments fail to make a profit.

I know, I know...I'm wasting my time trying to call for balance in our economy.

Far too many of you folks have been propagandized by a load of Randian (greed is good) nonsense.

Even when bubble after bubble bursts, you folks still are apparently mystified by why they're happening.

And many of you also apparently imagine that the reason there aren't jobs is becuase the superrich don't have enough money to invest, too.

There's no facts or logic that can open the minds of ideogues, I guess
 
I will gladly pay more taxes on anything I make over 250,000 this year.

The first 250,000 I make I will pay the same as you do on your 30,000.

That seems fair to me.

You see its hard but I could scrape by on just 249,000 this year.

I pay 10,000 a year in Federal taxes and State gets another 6,000 thats way to much money going to wasreful programs and free ******* loaders.
 
Last edited:
Do you think you are the only one paying taxes?


If you only pay 10,000 then why should someone making 500,000 a year pay less taxes than you?
 
You do realise within that tax bracket are ways to reduce that rate to much less right?

Only an idiot pays thes top amount.
 
15th post
No matter what the tax rate hiring a different tax consultant is not creating a job.
 
simple solutions for simple people.

Not all solutions can be explained in three sentances.

Sorry you cant keep up.
 
Back
Top Bottom