They’re giving ILLEGAL migrant families $30,000 to move into homes”. Democrat MA Gov. Maura Healey approved up to $30,000 per family in housing suppor

[WEATHER53]

Working people are allowed to request shelter.

One works to gain shelter and not in order to be given it

 

[Doc7505]

Those in need will need to move to Massachusetts to apply for the shelter assistance.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Thus, beginning a mass exodus from the State of Massachusetts, following other Deep Blue Plantation States.

 

[excalibur]

My American ancestry..Mom's side arrived with the Spanish in the early 1700's, Dad's side arrived with some dispossessed Catholics in what is now Maryland--around 1690.

All irrelevant--as the natives were here first.

Who had wiped out the previous natives.

 

[Southern Dad]

This sounds like an issue that the taxpayers in that state need to worry about.

 

[Moonglow]

And kids are allowed to request B-52's and free candy.

I think the big drink now is test tube babies.

 

[ThisIsMe]

They can also get shelter. It is a law in Mass.

Yeah, but you see things like this happening, and then complain about tax cuts for the rich and people not having enough money..yet dem states are giving away taxpayer money to people here illegally.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I'll keep that in mind if I ever lose my house. What happens to working people if they cant afford their property taxes?

It doesn’t work that way, see you probably make too much money, so, despite you paying taxes all these years, if YOU fall on hard times, there is no net for you, but an illegal can stroll across the border and get taxpayer assisted benefits without having had to contribute anything to the system.

 

[ThisIsMe]

They don't pay them.

And the government throws you in jail and takes everything you own

 

[ThisIsMe]

This sounds like an issue that the taxpayers in that state need to worry about.

Technically it is a federal problem. Sure, mass is paying for it NOW, but when they send requests for federal money next year, they’ll increase that number to make up for what they spent on this program. In the end, we all end up paying for it

 

[Moonglow]

And the government throws you in jail and takes everything you own

Nope, that is not how it happens in the places I have lived.

 

[ThisIsMe]

FAKE NEWS ALERT!


Based on 2025 and early 2026 reports, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey's administration expanded the HomeBASE program, allowing eligible families—including those in the state’s emergency shelter system—to receive up to $30,000 in housing assistance over a 24-month period. [1, 2]
Here is a breakdown of the benefits mentioned in the reports:

• Housing Assistance ($30,000): Eligible families in the state-run emergency shelter system can receive up to $30,000 over two years to assist with finding permanent housing, including first/last month's rent, security deposits, and stipends for rent. [1, 2]
• Expansion of Benefits (2025-2026): Reports indicated the Healey administration increased funding for the HomeBASE program to $97 million in 2025, with a significant rise in the number of families receiving assistance. [1, 2]
• Other Benefits (EBT, Food, Health, Cable): While the $30,000 housing assistance is a verified part of the HomeBASE program, claims regarding $4,000 monthly in EBT cash, $500 for food, and free cable are being cited by political critics and news outlets covering the controversy. [1, 2, 3]
• Eligibility and Restrictions: As of early 2025, new rules require applicants to show lawful presence, residency in Massachusetts, and provide identification to be eligible for emergency shelter. The state also capped the number of families in the emergency shelter system at 4,000 for the 2026 calendar year. [1, 2, 3]

The program, which is largely funded by taxpayers, has faced criticism from state lawmakers regarding its high cost, while supporters, including the Governor, have highlighted the need to move families from temporary shelters into long-term housing

“Lawful presence” = asylee claimants..

So anyone who claimed asylum, despite not having a legitimate asylum claim, is “lawfully present “

 

[Moonglow]

One works to gain shelter and not in order to be given it

Sometimes, some people may need help.

 

[Dante]

“Lawful presence” = asylee claimants..

So anyone who claimed asylum, despite not having a legitimate asylum claim, is “lawfully present “

One more weirdo posting for MAGA nonsense, conflating all sorts of things.

 

[Dante]

“Lawful presence” = asylee claimants..

So anyone who claimed asylum, despite not having a legitimate asylum claim, is “lawfully present “

"not having a legitimate asylum claim?" Wow, boy oh boy, are you seriously foolish

 

[ThisIsMe]

Nope, that is not how it happens in the places I have lived.

Oh? Ever hear of “tax evasion”?

 

[ThisIsMe]

One more weirdo posting for MAGA nonsense, conflating all sorts of things.

Asylum seekers are generally considered lawfully present in the United States while their application is pending, particularly for purposes of health insurance eligibility under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), provided they have authorization to work or are under 14 years old. While their claim is pending, they are not authorized to be removed from the country, and they are in a authorized period of stay. [1, 2, 3, 4]

I mean…

 

[ThisIsMe]

"not having a legitimate asylum claim?" Wow, boy oh boy, are you seriously foolish

Not at all, you see, 99.99999% of all of these illegals who are claiming asylum do not have a legitimate claim. You can’t claim asylum for economical reasons, and the government of Mexico is not persecuting their citizens, and those from beyond Mexico should have stopped at the first safe country, rather than leaving their country and traveling all the alway across Mexico to get to the US.

 

[Mac-7]

Those in need will need to move to Massachusetts to apply for the shelter assistance.

If we could consolidate all the illegals in America in Mass that might bring libs to their senses

 

[Dante]

Not at all, you see, 99.99999% of all of these illegals who are claiming asylum do not have a legitimate claim. You can’t claim asylum for economical reasons, and the government of Mexico is not persecuting their citizens, and those from beyond Mexico should have stopped at the first safe country, rather than leaving their country and traveling all the alway across Mexico to get to the US.

conflating things again

thank you

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

Well no, that's just a racist trope you buy into..but..if it happened, as it will..that White people decline in the US population:

America without White people would still be America.
Just not YOUR America~

Demographics are a b****h, eh?

No, it will just be a 3rd world hellscape, by the way, you know when we’re no longer the majority we’re not going to take care of the infrastructure right and everything’s gonna fall apart and you’re gonna live in South Africa then watch those demographics rapidly dwindle.


Darwin is winding up.