They attacked kids, and nothing is new

[Mac1958]

Well, it looks like ol' Mac was really, really wrong.

My assumption has always been that the one (1) thing the jihadists knew they couldn't do was slaughter children. Pop concert, school, hospital, church, whatever. I've always assumed that such an attack would be the one (1) thing that would unite the country and world against them, and that they were aware of that.

Nope, not gonna happen. Not kids. As crazed as they are, these guys know better.

Turns out that was completely wrong. Look at the comments by the usual suspects on these threads. Say something bad about the animals who did this, and ultimately the personal attacks and name-calling will begin - not directed at the jihadists, at you.

How much outrage has there been from the "media"? Half as much, one tenth as much, as they have with a story about Trump? Nope. No outrage. Just calm, balanced "reporting". How much outrage here? All of it from the usual suspects is directed at those who are outraged over the slaughter of kids.

I don't even want to think about what this really means.
.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It is surprising that they haven't yet attacked those most prominent of gun-free zones, elementary schools. A matter of time, I suppose.

 

[JoeB131]

Well, it looks like ol' Mac was really, really wrong.

My assumption has always been that the one (1) thing the jihadists knew they couldn't do was slaughter children. Pop concert, school, hospital, church, whatever. I've always assumed that such an attack would be the one (1) thing that would unite the country and world against them, and that they were aware of that.

why would you think that? Children have been getting slaughtered for years in our various wars in the Middle East. How many Children died in our invasion of Iraq, the Gulf War, the Libyan Civil War, the Zionist invasion of Gaza?

Hey, guy, everyone thinks this is bad and stuff. It's just that you hard core Islamophobes aren't exactly offering any real solutions to the problem.

"Let's get those guys!!"

Um, we've been getting those guys for 16 years now, and we are just creating more of them. Before they were just limited to Afghanistan. Now we have Yemen, Syria, Libya and Iraq that are all nests for this sort of thing.

"Let's ban the Muslims from getting into our countries!!!"

Um... okay. except most of the jokers who carry out these attacks were born in the countries they attack, so i'm not sure what good that's going to do, exactly. Let's ban new people so that their children or grandchildren won't be upset about whatever stupid thing we are going to do in 20 years?

Turns out that was completely wrong. Look at the comments by the usual suspects on these threads. Say something bad about the animals who did this, and ultimately the personal attacks and name-calling will begin - not directed at the jihadists, at you.

Maybe because we get tired of you trying to hide your Islamophobic bigotry behind a nice suit.

Look, the West is never, ever going to have a discussion about why we have a problem in that region. We'll just keep creating these guys and keep sending people over there to die needlessly.

 

[JoeB131]

Please note that Mac will not actually address any point I just made, he'll just say, "See, see, it's exactly what I said it was... see, see!"

 

[Disir]

Manchester bombing: government 'furious' at US leaks – as it happened
There is anger among British officials about US intelligence leaks, exacerbated when the New York Times published forensic photographs of bomb parts from the crime scene.

Manchester bombing: government 'furious' at US leaks – as it happened

The latest disclosures come on top of a series of leaks from US officials about the British investigation, including the naming of the killer.

The leak of the British information, as well as demonstrating a lack of respect for a US ally at an emotional time, will have hindered the investigation, where it is deemed essential to control the release of details.

UK counter-terrorism specialists said they needed to keep secret the name of any perpetrator or suspect for at least 36 hours to ensure there was an element of surprise in approaching relatives, friends and others.

The home secretary reflected the frustration and dismay of the UK security services in a series of interviews on Wednesday morning.

Adding to the sense of anger in the UK were further leaks from an NBC reporter who quoted US intelligence officials providing other details about the killer.

Photographs of Manchester bomb parts published after leak

Evidently, the media cannot shut up when it suits their purposes.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, it looks like ol' Mac was really, really wrong.

My assumption has always been that the one (1) thing the jihadists knew they couldn't do was slaughter children. Pop concert, school, hospital, church, whatever. I've always assumed that such an attack would be the one (1) thing that would unite the country and world against them, and that they were aware of that.

why would you think that? Children have been getting slaughtered for years in our various wars in the Middle East. How many Children died in our invasion of Iraq, the Gulf War, the Libyan Civil War, the Zionist invasion of Gaza?

Hey, guy, everyone thinks this is bad and stuff. It's just that you hard core Islamophobes aren't exactly offering any real solutions to the problem.

"Let's get those guys!!"

Um, we've been getting those guys for 16 years now, and we are just creating more of them. Before they were just limited to Afghanistan. Now we have Yemen, Syria, Libya and Iraq that are all nests for this sort of thing.

"Let's ban the Muslims from getting into our countries!!!"

Um... okay. except most of the jokers who carry out these attacks were born in the countries they attack, so i'm not sure what good that's going to do, exactly. Let's ban new people so that their children or grandchildren won't be upset about whatever stupid thing we are going to do in 20 years?

Turns out that was completely wrong. Look at the comments by the usual suspects on these threads. Say something bad about the animals who did this, and ultimately the personal attacks and name-calling will begin - not directed at the jihadists, at you.

Maybe because we get tired of you trying to hide your Islamophobic bigotry behind a nice suit.

Look, the West is never, ever going to have a discussion about why we have a problem in that region. We'll just keep creating these guys and keep sending people over there to die needlessly.

Please note that Mac will not actually address any point I just made, he'll just say, "See, see, it's exactly what I said it was... see, see!"

Precisely, thanks. You people literally can't help yourselves.
.

 

[LoneLaugher]

And....nobody.....anywhwhere...ever said that terrorists wouldn't kill kids. That includes you. You have never said that.

 

[LoneLaugher]

The country is united against terrorists. Where have you been?

 

[JoeB131]

Precisely, thanks. You people literally can't help yourselves.

You mean pointing out what a pompous phony with an insatiable need for attention you are?

Yup, we can't help making fun of you.

Now, when some day, you put on your big boy pants and discuss what we should actually do as policy, let me know.

 

[JoeB131]

And....nobody.....anywhwhere...ever said that terrorists wouldn't kill kids. That includes you. You have never said that.

Exactly the point. Kids get killed in war just like everyone else. War doesn't discriminate, whether your are a kid in Manchester, Gaza or Kabul.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Mac! The animals who carried out this cowardly act of violence against children are the scum of the earth. They deserve all the scorn and contempt that can possibly be levied against them.

Feel better?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

It looks like Islamic terrorists either don't care, or know that Western liberals will still defend and deflect for them no matter who they attack.

I mean don't forget, there's the Crusades after all, and the IRA.

 

[gipper]

Precisely, thanks. You people literally can't help yourselves.

You mean pointing out what a pompous phony with an insatiable need for attention you are?

Yup, we can't help making fun of you.

Now, when some day, you put on your big boy pants and discuss what we should actually do as policy, let me know.

If only Hillary had been elected, we would have many more radical Islamists welcomed in the USA. What could possibly go wrong?

 

[Esmeralda]

Well, it looks like ol' Mac was really, really wrong.

My assumption has always been that the one (1) thing the jihadists knew they couldn't do was slaughter children. Pop concert, school, hospital, church, whatever. I've always assumed that such an attack would be the one (1) thing that would unite the country and world against them, and that they were aware of that.

Nope, not gonna happen. Not kids. As crazed as they are, these guys know better.

Turns out that was completely wrong. Look at the comments by the usual suspects on these threads. Say something bad about the animals who did this, and ultimately the personal attacks and name-calling will begin - not directed at the jihadists, at you.

How much outrage has there been from the "media"? Half as much, one tenth as much, as they have with a story about Trump? Nope. No outrage. Just calm, balanced "reporting". How much outrage here? All of it from the usual suspects is directed at those who are outraged over the slaughter of kids.

I don't even want to think about what this really means.
.

I've been watching CNN and BBC and there is a lot of outrage because it was children.

 

[Virginia Mom]

Well, it looks like ol' Mac was really, really wrong.

My assumption has always been that the one (1) thing the jihadists knew they couldn't do was slaughter children. Pop concert, school, hospital, church, whatever. I've always assumed that such an attack would be the one (1) thing that would unite the country and world against them, and that they were aware of that.

why would you think that? Children have been getting slaughtered for years in our various wars in the Middle East. How many Children died in our invasion of Iraq, the Gulf War, the Libyan Civil War, the Zionist invasion of Gaza?

Hey, guy, everyone thinks this is bad and stuff. It's just that you hard core Islamophobes aren't exactly offering any real solutions to the problem.

"Let's get those guys!!"

Um, we've been getting those guys for 16 years now, and we are just creating more of them. Before they were just limited to Afghanistan. Now we have Yemen, Syria, Libya and Iraq that are all nests for this sort of thing.

"Let's ban the Muslims from getting into our countries!!!"

Um... okay. except most of the jokers who carry out these attacks were born in the countries they attack, so i'm not sure what good that's going to do, exactly. Let's ban new people so that their children or grandchildren won't be upset about whatever stupid thing we are going to do in 20 years?

Turns out that was completely wrong. Look at the comments by the usual suspects on these threads. Say something bad about the animals who did this, and ultimately the personal attacks and name-calling will begin - not directed at the jihadists, at you.

Maybe because we get tired of you trying to hide your Islamophobic bigotry behind a nice suit.

Look, the West is never, ever going to have a discussion we livw about why we have a problem in that region. We'll just keep creating these guys and keep sending people over there to die needlessly.

Please note that Mac will not actually address any point I just made, he'll just say, "See, see, it's exactly what I said it was... see, see!"

Precisely, thanks. You people literally can't help yourselves.
.

I remember Paula Dean being destroyed for saying the N word 20+ years ago, and the bakers for not wanting to bake a cake for a gay couple, but children being killed and injured, oh well, must make excuses. What a sick, evil world we live in.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It looks like Islamic terrorists either don't care, or know that Western liberals will still defend and deflect for them no matter who they attack.

I mean don't forget, there's the Crusades after all, and the IRA.

Who defended or deflected for Islamic terrorists?

 

[JoeB131]

It looks like Islamic terrorists either don't care, or know that Western liberals will still defend and deflect for them no matter who they attack.

I mean don't forget, there's the Crusades after all, and the IRA.

Yes, overall, people can be pretty shitty to each other.

Here's the thing. Nothing will come of this because after 40 years of this shit, we've all become kind of numb to it. We aren't going to send tens of thousands of troops to Libya to stabilize it. We aren't going to stop our policies of sticking our noses into other people's civil wars. We won't even try to find an alternative energy source to petroleum and cut off the funding to these people.

Instead, we'll keep sticking our dicks into the Middle East Hornet's Nest, and keep complaining when a hornet stings us. .

 

[JoeB131]

I remember Paula Dean being destroyed for saying the N word 20+ years ago, and the bakers for not wanting to bake a cake for a gay couple, but children being killed and injured, oh well, must make excuses. What a sick, evil world we live in.

except nobody is making excuses. there's a difference between "understanding how our stupid policies cause this' and making excuses.

Paula Dean and the Kleins destroyed themselves.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Who defended or deflected for Islamic terrorists?

Well, the utter imbecile in post # 3 in this very thread, for starters.

 

[Disir]

Precisely, thanks. You people literally can't help yourselves.

You mean pointing out what a pompous phony with an insatiable need for attention you are?

Yup, we can't help making fun of you.

Now, when some day, you put on your big boy pants and discuss what we should actually do as policy, let me know.

If only Hillary had been elected, we would have many more radical Islamists welcomed in the USA. What could possibly go wrong?

If only Hillary had been elected there would still be her policy. The Libyan policy. That support for the "rebels".

Not a peep though.

Not a peep about that shit.