people often use nation, country, state, and union interchangeably.
Well, a state is not really interchangeable as it pertains to a subset of a nation, and a union is an even broader term, but nation and country?
Pretty much synonymous with each other so of course people use them interchangeably, so, nationalism is really just prioritizing one's country first ahead of others, the de facto standard mode of thinking throughout mankind's history, which is what makes this discussion so absurd. What next, back to arguing what a woman is???
In political science, though, a nation is a function of society, not geography or politics, and that definition is where the term nationalism gets its meaning.
If you say so, but no one here is arguing some arcane political /science/ in the everyday lexicon of calling people Nazis, terrorists or racists just for taking pride in one's country over all other countries.
Nationalism isn't just the love of American values; it is placing Americans above all others with the rest below, and demanding that it gets more of the benefits of society.
When a father or mother acts for the best interests of their family, putting their household and children's interests ahead of all families in general, that is just another expression of "nationalism," taking care of one's own. Are you now going to start calling all parents racist? Do you know any parents who don't put their own family, household and children first? That is what is so stupid about this argument and the claims of some of you people. America used to be a family, a team, united, until the radical, deranged Left took over and tore us apart.
Here are two sources right from the web---- do you see one word about racism in either one? Nope. Nationalism is a GREAT thing. It is a NORMAL thing. It is the PREFERRED, COMMON state of most people throughout history. And it still is, except with befuddled, confused, brainwashed white American liberals.
White nationalism is the same belief, just for white people.
Who says? And if we accept white nationalism for white people, then we must accept black nationalism, brown nationalism, yellow nationalism and red nationalism for black, brown, yellow and red people. I mean, what do you think the Black Panthers are? Don't you see that these are artificial and unnecessary subsets of nationalism? Because nationalism applies to ALL people! So why conflate it into a means of trying to DIVIDE people up, much less claim that just because white people put white people first and black people put black people first, that this is any different from normal family interests? It is NORMAL for people to congregate according to common interests just as cheetahs congregate with cheetahs and tigers congregate with tigers, but would you call THEM racist?
LOOK--- the point here is not that there isn't racist people out there, but the danger here is in wrongly ascribing racism to
EVERYONE who simply takes pride in their country and wants to put their country first before worrying about other countries by putting unnecessary and inaccurate labels on them! Bottom line is that it is simply bullshit to claim that being nationalistic (of any color or none) is the same as the kind of Aryan Supremacism mentality sponsored by Hitler 100 years ago!
Now, I want to see Coyote read this and give me another disagree on these points! Where are you Mrs. C??? Nationalism in its native form is simply that which is on the far end of the scale from GLOBALISM. One might almost argue this is as much an ECONOMIC mindset as it is a social or political one.