There is no more rule of law in America.

[Marener]

This gives us the right to correct the wrong statistics which the left pushes. You are doing it again as well.

You know 2022 and 2024 are totally different years, right?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Trump has pardoned Russ Ulbrict. This is a man that sold fentanyl, heroin, Meth, and any other drug he could on the dark web. He is responsible for at least 6 deaths by overdose.

But hey, Laken Riley.

Who Is Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht? What We Know

President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced he granted a full pardon to Ross Ulbricht, the founder of notorious dark web marketplace Silk Road, which allowed users to buy and sell illegal products and services anonymously.

In Truth Social post, the president claimed that the same individuals that convicted Ulbricht were "the same lunatics" that were involved in the weaponization against him.

Who Is Ross Ulbricht?

Ross Ulbricht is the founder of Silk Road, an infamous dark web marketplace that facilitated the anonymous sale of illegal goods and services, including drugs, hacking tools and counterfeit documents like passports.

What Is The Silk Road Dark Web?

The Silk Road was a black market accessible only via the encrypted Tor network, which anonymized users and their locations. The platform operated for the sale of illegal goods and services and was one of the first users of Bitcoin, which offered an additional layer of secrecy for buyers and sellers.

The Silk Road quickly gained notoriety for facilitating drug trafficking and other illicit activities. The marketplace generated millions of dollars in sales and more than $13 million dollars' worth of Bitcoin in commissions, according to a press release from the FBI.

The narcotics distributed on Silk Road have been linked to at least six overdose deaths across the world, according to a press release from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Who is Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht?

President Donald Trump granted a pardon to Silk Road marketplace founder Ross Ulbricht, a promise he made to the cryptocurrency industry during his campaign.

www.newsweek.com

There is no more rule of law in America.

You have some brass whining about Trump's pardons after witnessing Biden's.

 

[Cougarbear]

You know 2022 and 2024 are totally different years, right?

You know the FBI said they lied, don't you? Why do you keep parroting the Biden time stats?

 

[Marener]

You know the FBI said they lied, don't you? Why do you keep parroting the Biden time stats?

They didn’t. You lied.

 

[Cougarbear]

They didn’t. You lied.

Same to you but more of it...Cut low....Your momma wears army boots....

 

[Marener]

Same to you but more of it...Cut low....Your momma wears army boots....

The FBI statistics guru had to very calmly explain to some very mathematically challenged Republicans why their narrative about crime statistics was wrong.

 

[Cougarbear]

The FBI statistics guru had to very calmly explain to some very mathematically challenged Republicans why their narrative about crime statistics was wrong.

All you have to do is listen to the first few minutes and the FBI revised their numbers and did not publish these to the public. Violent crime went up, not down. Plain and simple. After all, when you defund the police, let tens of thousands of criminals into the U.S. you are going to have an increase in violent crimes. Plain logic. Democrats are not logical thinkers.

 

[beagle9]

Xiden used the power of the pardon to let a kid killer free...and you defend it.

Anyone defending Biden at this point, is truly a sick minded individual.

 

[Marener]

All you have to do is listen to the first few minutes and the FBI revised their numbers and did not publish these to the public. Violent crime went up, not down. Plain and simple. After all, when you defund the police, let tens of thousands of criminals into the U.S. you are going to have an increase in violent crimes. Plain logic. Democrats are not logical thinkers.

All you have to do is listen to the first few minutes and the FBI revised their numbers and did not publish these to the public. Violent crime went up, not down. Plain and simple. After all, when you defund the police, let tens of thousands of criminals into the U.S. you are going to have an increase in violent crimes. Plain logic. Democrats are not logical thinkers.

Except they did. He explained it very carefully. The problem is that you’re misunderstanding the revision. 2021 was artificially low because they didn’t have enough data. So in 2022, they manually collected missing data from 2021 to show a more accurate representation.

2022 didn’t change. 2021 increases because they collected more complete data.

The accurate result was a decrease in violent crime in 2022. There’s no lie and no scandal.

At the 30 minute mark, Jim Jordan is reading from his prepared script intended to get viral views, but he clearly doesn’t understand what’s going on.

 

[Cougarbear]

Except they did. He explained it very carefully. The problem is that you’re misunderstanding the revision. 2021 was artificially low because they didn’t have enough data. So in 2022, they manually collected missing data from 2021 to show a more accurate representation.

2022 didn’t change. 2021 increases because they collected more complete data.

The accurate result was a decrease in violent crime in 2022. There’s no lie and no scandal.

At the 30 minute mark, Jim Jordan is reading from his prepared script intended to get viral views, but he clearly doesn’t understand what’s going on.

You are talking about the wrong years. Listen to the first 10 minutes.

 

[Marener]

You are talking about the wrong years. Listen to the first 10 minutes.

Nope. He explained it calmly and repeatedly several time to some republicans who, like you, had gotten a narrative drilled into your heads.

There was no revision. The only thing that happened was the automated system didn’t include manually sourced data from 2021.

 

[struth]

Except they did. He explained it very carefully. The problem is that you’re misunderstanding the revision. 2021 was artificially low because they didn’t have enough data. So in 2022, they manually collected missing data from 2021 to show a more accurate representation.

2022 didn’t change. 2021 increases because they collected more complete data.

The accurate result was a decrease in violent crime in 2022. There’s no lie and no scandal.

At the 30 minute mark, Jim Jordan is reading from his prepared script intended to get viral views, but he clearly doesn’t understand what’s going on.

It changed, you can claim the data was the same, and I agree, but they didn’t add the data to the automatic chart, that they finished published, and had to add it…thus it was revised

 

[Marener]

It changed, you can claim the data was the same, and I agree, but they didn’t add the data to the automatic chart, that they finished published, and had to add it…thus it was revised

The thing the republicans can’t understand is that 2021 it wasn’t revised down and the FBI statistics saying violent crime went down 1.7% was accurate.

You can see the Republicans just incapable of giving up their narrative and no matter how many times he explains it to Jim Jordan, he just doesn’t get it.

 

[struth]

The thing the republicans can’t understand is that 2021 it wasn’t revised down and the FBI statistics saying violent crime went down 1.7% was accurate.

You can see the Republicans just incapable of giving up their narrative and no matter how many times he explains it to Jim Jordan, he just doesn’t get it.

What was weird is the guy didn’t even know about the 4.5 percent increase…how in the world did he not know about that?

And why in the world did they put out two difference reports?

 

[Marener]

What was weird is the guy didn’t even know about the 4.5 percent increase…how in the world did he not know about that?

He didn’t know about it because it doesn’t exist. It comes out of erroneous reporting from a shoddy website that didn’t understand the issue.

It’s fake news and although he explained it repeatedly, the low IQ Republicans asking questions couldn’t stop saying “4.5%” because that’s what they were told to say.

 

[struth]

He didn’t know about it because it doesn’t exist. It comes out of erroneous reporting from a shoddy website that didn’t understand the issue.

It’s fake news and although he explained it repeatedly, the low IQ Republicans asking questions couldn’t stop saying “4.5%” because that’s what they were told to say.

um, they were literally reading it off the report that they submitted. to the Committee. Did you not watch the hearing????

 

[Marener]

um, they were literally reading it off the report that they submitted. to the Committee. Did you not watch the hearing????

No, they weren't. The supposed 4.5% increase wasn't in any report from the FBI. It was generated by Real Clear Investigations which downloaded data from their automated system which was incomplete and came to an incorrect conclusion about what happened.

Real Clear Investigations somehow came up with the idea that the 2022 data was revised up, when in fact it was the 2021 data that differed between the report (which had more complete data) and the automated system (which had incomplete data). The incomplete data, unsurprisingly, lowballed the actual crime rates.

 

[struth]

No, they weren't. The supposed 4.5% increase wasn't in any report from the FBI. It was generated by Real Clear Investigations which downloaded data from their automated system which was incomplete and came to an incorrect conclusion about what happened.

Real Clear Investigations somehow came up with the idea that the 2022 data was revised up, when in fact it was the 2021 data that differed between the report (which had more complete data) and the automated system (which had incomplete data). The incomplete data, unsurprisingly, lowballed the actual crime rates.

Geez, man, check it's literally the entire discussion

The guy says that they were looking at the data that the FBI first put out, the data that didn't include the manual data that they later put in.

 

[Marener]

Geez, man, check it's literally the entire discussion

The guy says that they were looking at the data that the FBI first put out, the data that didn't include the manual data that they later put in.

The guy is confused. So are you. There never was any report by the FBI showing a 4.5% increase in violent crime. The only way to come to that conclusion is by using the incomplete 2021 data.

 

[struth]

The guy is confused. So are you. There never was any report by the FBI showing a 4.5% increase in violent crime. The only way to come to that conclusion is by using the incomplete 2021 data.

I don’t disagree he is very confused, that’s why it’s so concerning the xiden fbi handling of all this