Zone1 There is no God they said

True, but I can see the animation of the cell. All I have to “prove” your book is the book itself and I’ve already seen the lies that exist in the second half of thst book for myself, in my own life. So you’re really gonna have to come up with something pretty spectacular to change my mind.
Lies like what....do tell
 
True, but I can see the animation of the cell. All I have to “prove” your book is the book itself and I’ve already seen the lies that exist in the second half of thst book for myself, in my own life. So you’re really gonna have to come up with something pretty spectacular to change my mind.
Yes we can clearly see the animation of a cell and have 0 explanation of what animates it yet, there it is doing machinations, coding, decoding, building engines, valves, permeable membranes that exclude and include foreign matter etc.

We have also seen the Earth, stars, plants animals and everything around us stay in motion with purposes. To believe all of this is happenstance seems quite a stretch in belief. It is more logical there be some kind of overall purpose or guiding entity.

Most people think of that entity as God which is a belief.....same as accidental life theory for which there is no proof.
 
Do tell why anyone can't click on a link
One can, but one does not choose to disable ad-block. Also, I never take only one source, so I searched for other sources on the same topic...and, there were none--which makes me doubt the reliability of first source, especially when someone who posted the single source cannot even summarize the findings.
 
Most people think of that entity as God which is a belief.....same as accidental life theory for which there is no proof.
Yes, and I’m one of those people. However I do not believe that entity has a personality or identify it as anything other than a Universal Force. I don’t believe in personification of that at force. Nor do I worship that force. Thus the difference.
 
Yes, and I’m one of those people. However I do not believe that entity has a personality or identify it as anything other than a Universal Force. I don’t believe in personification of that at force. Nor do I worship that force. Thus the difference.
You are that force. Your observation changes reality. If you really think about it. You're not alone however, no one really is.
 
Most people think of that entity as God which is a belief.....same as accidental life theory for which there is no proof.

heavenly creation is a vast distance from the desert bibles -

try removing those bibles for a generation and what better would evolve as true religion than the forgeries and fallacies madeup in the past used presently that have never come to any fruition or value.
 
heavenly creation is a vast distance from the desert bibles -

try removing those bibles for a generation and what better would evolve as true religion than the forgeries and fallacies madeup in the past used presently that have never come to any fruition or value.
It reminds me of a 1954 Buick I had with a rusty front bumper. One night I awoke to an earth-shaking bolt of lightening and when I went into garage I discovered that the bumper had turned to pure gold. This is a fact.
 
heavenly creation is a vast distance from the desert bibles -

try removing those bibles for a generation and what better would evolve as true religion than the forgeries and fallacies madeup in the past used presently that have never come to any fruition or value.
You really need to explain what removing bibles means. I mean, how would that be done? Why would that turn out any better?
 
There's the newer school of thought that has finally started to accept that the bibles are all allegorical nonsense. It's juzf taking longer than expected to be fully accepted. Our Ding tries his best but receives very little support. Even getting nothing but condemnation for abandoning his faith.
Parts of the Pentateuch are allegories like Genesis. Leviticus is civil law. Allegories are great way to express ideas. Genesis was way ahead of its time. It described evolution free will and moral values and mans inherent need to create meaning.
 
You really need to explain what removing bibles means. I mean, how would that be done? Why would that turn out any better?

well, deem the desert bibles, persona non grata - just for kicks ...

let the desert dwellers flounder in the darkness they deserve all on their own while everyone else is blessed by true heavenly sunshine obscured by the conclusion of the 1st century events - let flourish liberation theology, self determination cut short by the murder of the patriarch of religious freedom.
 
15th post
Biochemical energy

the spiritual content of physiology - the individual identity of one being ...

not one blade of grass from 200 million years past to the present and forever into the future will ever be identical to another blade of its kind or anything else.
 
the spiritual content of physiology - the individual identity of one being ...

not one blade of grass from 200 million years past to the present and forever into the future will ever be identical to another blade of its kind or anything else.
Actually it is possible given enough time
 
I have complete faith 'God' exists as something completely negative to the earthly interpretation of 'Him'
~S~
What language do you reckon 'He' speaks?

Yep. Here he is using his stage name:

Love.webp
 
Parts of the Pentateuch are allegories like Genesis. Leviticus is civil law. Allegories are great way to express ideas. Genesis was way ahead of its time. It described evolution free will and moral values and mans inherent need to create meaning.
Good for you if that works for you! Most Xtians still have to live the lies and bullsh-t on their bibles being the word of the god.
 
Back
Top Bottom