Being Muslim does not automatically mean being a terrorist any,ore than being a Christian means you're a member of the KKK.
We are no longer fighting wars with B-17s and Norton bomb sites. Carpet bombing is a war crime in the age of GPS guides bombs.
Art is the signature of civilzation. I didn't say that, Beverly Sills did. To censor art is to repress free expression.
Homosexuality is a reality among all cultures and all peoples and even in some other animal species. It does no harm to me or you or anyone else. Because YOU have hang ups about human sexuality, it does not grant you power over other's sexuality so long as that other sexuality harms no one and is consensual among adults.
Pregnancy is a matter between a woman, her spouse or partner and a doctor. Pregnancy is not your concern, nor the government's concern. Personal lives are exactly that: personal. Mind your own business. This is America, Land of the Free.
So, you see, you did more to confirm my post rather than refute it. Far Right in America? Look in the mirror.
1. Actually you're wrong. Being a Muslim DOES mean being a terrorist. That's because "being Muslim" is being a follower of the Koran which advocates (if not commands) mass genocide against non-Muslims. (Koran 8:12, 9:5, 9:123, et al). It would help if people who talk about Islam would read the Koran, so as to know what they're talking about. And terrorism isn't the only problem. The Koran is inundated with all sorts of immoral (and illegal under US laws) stuff that makes Muslims simply unassimilatable in American society, and immensely anti-social.
Those who do not prescribe to the Koran and general Islamic practices, can assimilate perfectly well and be great US citizens , and some are, BUT they then are being NON-Muslims, regardless of what they may call themselves. Example: I know a woman who calls herself Muslim, but she's a lesbian, drinks alcohol, belongs to an anti-wifebeating org, and has a dog. Obviously, she's not a Muslim.
2. I'm taking it that the answer to the question is, based on the technology of the 1940s, no you would not be against carpet bombing of Germany, or possibilty doing it now, if no other alternative was feasible. (GPS bombing isn't always)
3. Since I don't allow answers to be detached from my questions, I'm taking it that your evasive "answer" means that you would be OK with the molestation of children in movies or plays & the abuse of animals, as long as the perpetrator was doing it in a movie or play, and calling it "art". Please show a little more backbone in your "answers".
4. Nobody said homosexuality wasn't real. Homosexuality
certainly DOES do harm. It is a mental aberration, which is harmful as much as any other mental aberration, and defining it as normal, causes people to wrongly think it is acceptable, encourages them to engage in it (this is especially dangerous for young vulnerable teenagers) If we defined agoraphobia or claustraphobia as normal that would be harmful to the people afflicted with those illnesses.
5.
FALSE! You left out one critically important player in the abortion issue. The MOST important one of all. That is the soon to be born person, and that person, in 20 years will be able to speak clearly on his/her own, but at the pregnancy time, that person needs the voice that CAN be heard, and that voice of the voice of the American people, which may be reflected through the govt. That is what makes it the business of every America, just like it is the business of everyone to stop murderers and thieves.
So, you see, I refuted your post, and I have now refuted it in greater detail Hope you learned something.
