Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 19,691
- 35,782
- 2,430
There is no democracy without a free press. Right now, there is no democracy.

There is no democracy without a free press. Right now, there is no democracy. - Flopping Aces
There is no democracy without a free press. That's been echoed by many people. Here's one view:

There is no democracy without a free press. Thatās been echoed by many people.
Hereās one view:
The purpose of a free press is to ensure that the people are free to receive and impart information that is not manipulated or serving a particular person, entity or interest. Its duty, in fact, is often to investigate people of power, and especially the government, to ask the hard questions and to attempt to uncover whatās really happening, regardless of the political fallout.
ānot manipulated or serving a particular person.āToday much of the press is manipulated in favor of a particular person- Joe Biden. Censorship by the left-wing media is very troublesome- it cost Donald Trump the 2020 election. Trump has been harassed and pursued by phony charges and accusations since 2015.If you pay attention to the media, you see that every accusation about Trump is true but every piece of evidence against Biden is false. Each time a credible piece of evidence against Biden appears, the DNC media ignores it.
On Fridayās broadcast of Newsmax TVās āRob Schmitt Tonight,ā journalist Matt Taibbi stated that he believes there has been a lack of coverage of allegations of influence-peddling against President Joe Biden because āit happens to be politically inconvenientā and stated that it almost seems like members of the media ājust get a memo to not cover stuff.ā
Taibbi said, āI think a lot of journalists of an older generation feel the same way, which is, once upon a time, most reporters didnāt really care who was in office. If they were corrupt, if they did something wrong, weād do the reporting. It didnāt really matter to us. The idea that you would non-report something like the Biden story because it happens to be politically inconvenient would have been inconceivable, I think, in the mainstream press, even a dozen years ago.ā
The dog whistle gets blown.**********
**********

Commentary:
If you think we have a āFree Pressā, look who owns the Press.
Despite what the Quisling controlled Media America tells us daily, America is under attack on every front by Maoist Marxist Democrats. We see this in their attacks on our Children, their teaching, attacks on the Christian religion, Conservatives, Whites, and now on our political choices.
Has there been a time when the media became a Ministry of Propaganda for one specific party, promoting lies about the other party while suppressing any bad stories about the protected party?
Yes!⦠RIGHT NOW.
The "free press" in its original form was the honest broadcasting of the news by paper, radio, or TV.
We now have the internet.
So, the real issue comes down to this: "If we don't have "freedom of speech," we don't have a "democracy."
By that reasoning, we still have a "Democracy" albeit a fragile one.
That said, there are other ways to kill a "Democracy." One is a collapse of the institutions that the "Democracy" depends on, like the DOJ, the FBI, and the military (which has gone Woke).
Each day that goes by we are seeing the truth in Nakita Khruschev's predictive words.
See:
Nikita Khrushchev And 'We Will Take America Without Firing A Shot'
In his speech on November 18, 1956 Nikita Khrushchev predicted the downfall of capitalism. ŠŃ Š²Š°Ń ŠæŠ¾Ń
Š¾ŃŠ¾Š½ŠøŠ¼! we will bury you!
