Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 73,287
- 18,881
- 2,190
You say that as you completely deflect from my question. NiceI donāt believe that any part of your deflection effort matters worth a tinkerās damn in hell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You say that as you completely deflect from my question. NiceI donāt believe that any part of your deflection effort matters worth a tinkerās damn in hell.
LolYou say that as you completely deflect from my question. Nice![]()
My question was addressing your post about me being confused about words. I want to see if you think mentally ill people can be intelligent or if you think mentally ill implies the person is of low intellect. that goes directly to my point that you think Iām confused about.Lol
Your āquestionā is the deflection,
Try posting ON topic, you transparent troll.
Thereās no phrasing. Those are hard facts that canāt be worded in any other way.Itās not really a matter of anyone needing to think that. If those are the facts of what occurred then thatās what happened. You trying to phrase it like itās not a believable thing is a conspiracy tactic. Why donāt you just make the argument you want to make and back it up with real facts?
Skip the attempt at Orwellian bs.My question was addressing your post about me being confused about words. I want to see if you think mentally ill people can be intelligent or if you think mentally ill implies the person is of low intellect. that goes directly to my point that you think Iām confused about.
Thereās your direct answer. Your turn. Try a direct answer to my question and donāt be a hypocrite
You demonstrated your misuse of words at the very outset. And your question is off topic.My question was addressing your post about me being confused about words. I want to see if you think mentally ill people can be intelligent or if you think mentally ill implies the person is of low intellect. that goes directly to my point that you think Iām confused about
Pretty soon heāll give the inevitable āso whatā about why the shooting occurred.Lol
Your āquestionā is the deflection,
Try posting ON topic, you transparent troll.
Defective at best.You demonstrated your misuse of words at the very outset. And your question an off topic.
Stop trying to deflect.
How about you just admit that the ******* assailant didnāt need to be mentally bright in the case of his attempted assassination of Trump. Why not? Because the secret service āprotectionā of former President Trump was inexplicably defective.
Exactly. And so inexplicable that the present acting director admitted as much in the hearing today. Points to him for that concession.Defective at best.
1. The government orchestrated the shooting using a loner with mental issues to do the shooting knowing the shooter would be dead within seconds of Trump being shot.
2. A 20 year old kid with mental issues outsmarted the most sophisticated protective agency in the world.
You pick. Both choices are really really bad.
You really do need to stop reading daily Kos.Crooks was an ideal Trump supporter. Another Kyle Rittenhouse. The kind of people Trump told the secret service to let into his "stop the steal" rally in DC on January 6th.
'They're not here to hurt me': Former aide says Trump knew Jan. 6 crowd was armed
āI donāt f---ing care that they have weapons,ā Trump fumed in urging aides to take down magnetometers near the White House before he addressed a āStop the Stealā rally, Hutchinson testified. āTheyāre not here to hurt me. Take the f---ing mags away.ā
Can you back up that statement?The SS saw him on the roof with a rifle 10 minutes before Trump went on stage without raising the alarm to get Trump out.
Itās in the timeline. Look it up using your own Leftist sites you trust.Can you back up that statement?
That is true facts are facts. Do you consider it a fact that mentally ill 20 year olds can be of superior intellect?Skip the attempt at Orwellian bs.
Facts are facts.
There was obvious holes and miscommunication with the security team. The kids intellect doesnāt really matter except for the framing of the OP who IMO is trying to paint the kid as low intellect to indirectly stoke a conspiracy theory. If Iām wrong about that Iād be happy for him to clarify his point. Iāve asked him to do so but surprise surprise. He deflectedYou demonstrated your misuse of words at the very outset. And your question is off topic.
Stop trying to deflect.
How about you just admit that the ******* assailant didnāt need to be mentally bright in the case of his attempted assassination of Trump. Why not? Because the secret service āprotectionā of former President Trump was inexplicably defective.
I literally just heard the SS director testify to Congress and that wasnāt his account. Since you claim that is what happened, Please back it up. We both know you canāt so letās see what laughable deflection you come up withItās in the timeline. Look it up using your own Leftist sites you trust.
There was obvious holes and miscommunication with the security team.
His intellect doesnāt concern me at all. There is no evidence that he was particularly bright, however. But for the incompetence of the Secrwt Service, in fact, he would have been dead well before he ever fired even one shot.The kids intellect doesnāt really matter except for the framing of the OP who IMO is trying to paint the kid as low intellect to indirectly stoke a conspiracy theory.
Last Director blamed a slopey roof, so Iām not surprised.I literally just heard the SS director testify to Congress and that wasnāt his account. Since you claim that is what happened, Please back it up. We both know you canāt so letās see what laughable deflection you come up with
Which is why Iām pointing out the phrasing of the OP who painted an option that a mentally ill 20 year old outsmarted the most sophisticated security agency in the world.Yea. There were.
His intellect doesnāt concern me at all. There is no evidence that he was particularly bright, however. But for the incompetence of the Secrwt Service, in fact, he would have been dead well before he ever fired even one shot.
The point is that it didnāt require intellect for him to do what he did.
My questionS are just one I keep asking.You say that as you completely deflect from my question. Nice![]()