There Are Far More Defensive Gun Uses Than Murders in America. Here's Why You Rarely Hear of Them.

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,713
27,669
2,430

There Are Far More Defensive Gun Uses Than Murders in America. Here's Why You Rarely Hear of Them.​


While Americans know that guns take many innocent lives every year, many don’t know that firearms also save them.
On May 15, an attacker at an apartment complex in Fort Smith, Ark., fatally shot a woman and then fired 93 rounds at other people before a man killed him with a bolt-action rifle. Police said he “likely saved a number of lives in the process.”
On June 30, a 12-year-old Louisiana boy used a hunting rifle to stop an armed burglar who was threatening his mother’s life during a home invasion.
On July 4, a Chicago gunman shot into a crowd of people, killing one and wounding two others before a concealed handgun permit holder shot and wounded the attacker. Police praised him for stepping in.
These are just a few of the nearly 1,000 instances reported by the media so far this year in which gun owners have stopped mass shootings and other murderous acts, saving countless lives. And crime experts say such high-profile cases represent only a small fraction of the instances in which guns are used defensively. But the data are unclear, for a number of reasons, and this has political ramifications because it seems to undercut the claims of gun rights advocates that they need to possess firearms for personal protection -- an issue now before the Supreme Court.
Americans who look only at the daily headlines would be surprised to learn that, according to academic estimates, defensive gun uses — including instances when guns are simply shown to deter a crime — are four to five times more common than gun crimes, and far more frequent than the fewer than 20,000 murders each year, with or without a gun. But even when they prevent mass public shootings, defensive uses rarely get national news coverage. Those living in major news markets such as New York City, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles are unlikely to hear of such stories.
~Snip~
Take the fatal shooting of two at the West Freeway Church of Christ near Fort Worth, Texas, in December 2019, for example. The media covered this attack, but repeatedly described the parishioners who stopped further bloodshed as “security guards.” “These were not security professionals, just members of the church designated as security personnel as a kind of honorary title,” Jack Wilson, the church member credited with stopping the attack, told RCI. Wilson said that 19 to 20 members of the congregation were armed, but that neither he nor the church monitored who was carrying.

Comment:
You would think that the American people would prefer to hear/see stories like these. That is just not the case. They want to see hatred. They want to see the worst of human interaction. We have been so indoctrinated into violence (video games and TV) that we come to expect it like it was our evening meal.
Typically the Media say's 'If it bleeds it reads'. So why would they ever give the public the truth? Rather they would go along with Socialist power grabbing ideology.
 
Guns save more lives than they take. Many more.

Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives | GOA - Gun Owners


Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]

Gun owner fantasy of “scaring away bad guys”
 
Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]

Gun owner fantasy of “scaring away bad guys”

Pretty effective eh. You don't even have to fire the weapon to save a life.

Don't you wish all tools were that effective?!? Imagine pulling out your hammer and the nails just jump into the boards. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]

Gun owner fantasy of “scaring away bad guys”

:auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301:
 
Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]

Gun owner fantasy of “scaring away bad guys”
So statistics are a fantasy ?
 
Justifiable homicide is relatively rare. Here.

According to the table on p.6, less then 1.1% of people attacked have defended themselves with firearms.
 
Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers.

Unlikely. The judicial system typically views warning shots as careless behavior that could fall under the definition of unlawful use of deadly force, and common sense indicates a warning shot merely gives an attacker a extra chance to shoot/knife/bludgeon you.
 
You show a man your gun to scare him off.

He shoots you dead.

It's likely he'll get off because he was defending himself.

I do think there's a passive benefit to guns where no gun is ever seen or maybe there wasn't even a gun present. It's a person who is thinking of wrong doing but then thinks that his target may be armed and he decides not to act.

But everyone benefits from that, gun or no gun.
 
Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]
Sounds like it worked.

Just because somebody doesn't get killed does not mean the gun was not used defensively.
 
You show a man your gun to scare him off.

He shoots you dead.

It's likely he'll get off because he was defending himself.

I do think there's a passive benefit to guns where no gun is ever seen or maybe there wasn't even a gun present. It's a person who is thinking of wrong doing but then thinks that his target may be armed and he decides not to act.

But everyone benefits from that, gun or no gun.
Why are you showing somebody your gun to scare him off? What did he do to cause you to be in fear for your safety?
 

There Are Far More Defensive Gun Uses Than Murders in America. Here's Why You Rarely Hear of Them.​


While Americans know that guns take many innocent lives every year, many don’t know that firearms also save them.
On May 15, an attacker at an apartment complex in Fort Smith, Ark., fatally shot a woman and then fired 93 rounds at other people before a man killed him with a bolt-action rifle. Police said he “likely saved a number of lives in the process.”
On June 30, a 12-year-old Louisiana boy used a hunting rifle to stop an armed burglar who was threatening his mother’s life during a home invasion.
On July 4, a Chicago gunman shot into a crowd of people, killing one and wounding two others before a concealed handgun permit holder shot and wounded the attacker. Police praised him for stepping in.
These are just a few of the nearly 1,000 instances reported by the media so far this year in which gun owners have stopped mass shootings and other murderous acts, saving countless lives. And crime experts say such high-profile cases represent only a small fraction of the instances in which guns are used defensively. But the data are unclear, for a number of reasons, and this has political ramifications because it seems to undercut the claims of gun rights advocates that they need to possess firearms for personal protection -- an issue now before the Supreme Court.
Americans who look only at the daily headlines would be surprised to learn that, according to academic estimates, defensive gun uses — including instances when guns are simply shown to deter a crime — are four to five times more common than gun crimes, and far more frequent than the fewer than 20,000 murders each year, with or without a gun. But even when they prevent mass public shootings, defensive uses rarely get national news coverage. Those living in major news markets such as New York City, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles are unlikely to hear of such stories.
~Snip~
Take the fatal shooting of two at the West Freeway Church of Christ near Fort Worth, Texas, in December 2019, for example. The media covered this attack, but repeatedly described the parishioners who stopped further bloodshed as “security guards.” “These were not security professionals, just members of the church designated as security personnel as a kind of honorary title,” Jack Wilson, the church member credited with stopping the attack, told RCI. Wilson said that 19 to 20 members of the congregation were armed, but that neither he nor the church monitored who was carrying.

Comment:
You would think that the American people would prefer to hear/see stories like these. That is just not the case. They want to see hatred. They want to see the worst of human interaction. We have been so indoctrinated into violence (video games and TV) that we come to expect it like it was our evening meal.
Typically the Media say's 'If it bleeds it reads'. So why would they ever give the public the truth? Rather they would go along with Socialist power grabbing ideology.
The liberal media hates the fact that civilians can own firearms in this nation. Therefore they push stories where guns are misused and ignore stories where guns are used to save lives.
 
Why are you showing somebody your gun to scare him off? What did he do to cause you to be in fear for your safety?

The idea of carrying a concealed weapon is just that. You don't pull or expose the weapon until you are prepared and ready to use it. Exposing the fact that you possess the firearm opens you to dangers.

I'll give you an example... I know a retire Leo that was in a traffic jam because a "woman" was triple parked in NYC. He got out of his vehicle and approached the triple park car and asked the woman to move her car. his jacket was open and the "woman" saw his weapon called the police and claimed he harassed and threatened her with the gun. P.S. Case closed the gun was confiscated and the guy lost his privilege to carry a concealed weapon. Why because the "woman" saw his holstered weapon from under his jacket and claimed he was harassing.
If you're carrying in summertime always keep your concealed weapon to the rear and back of your strong side. Tip if you're a right use a left handed inside the belt holster.
 

Forum List

Back
Top