Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A panelist on a recent forum concerning world hunger stated that if food waste was reduced, and if people didn't overeat, there was enough food at current production levels to sustain a growing population until 2040.
Food isn't scarce, it's just mismanaged. Animal agriculture is as well.Diet for a Small Planet is a 1971 bestselling book by Frances Moore Lappé, the first major book to note the environmental impact of meat production as wasteful and a contributor to global food scarcity.
Diet for a Small Planet - Wikipedia
View attachment 750999
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diet_for_a_Small_Planet
I read this when it first came out and have not eaten meat since
Or we could just stop having babies for a few years and let the population come back down naturally,
solving EVERY FUCKING PROBLEM IN THE WORLD.
How about NO?Or we could just stop having babies for a few years .....
There is no "overpopulation," and every problem we have now we had when there were half as many people, and half of that, and half of that.So, every problem in the world is caused by overpopulation?
We didn't have any problems when there were fewer people?
There is no "overpopulation," and every problem we have now we had when there were half as many people, and half of that, and half of that.
Around 10 years ago or so, I read an informative article about how it really isn’t food scarcity that’s the problem, it’s the fact that distribution doesn’t pay off, so nobody has any desire to do it.Food isn't scarce, it's just mismanaged. Animal agriculture is as well.
Totalitarian Tyrants cause that.
It's all about logistics. How do we ship day old chicken McNuggets to Africa in a timely fashion?Food isn't scarce, it's just mismanaged. Animal agriculture is as well.
Who wants to feed someone to grow up and kill innocent people? They ran all the white farmers out of Africa and took their..everything. It's their baby now.Around 10 years ago or so, I read an informative article about how it really isn’t food scarcity that’s the problem, it’s the fact that distribution doesn’t pay off, so nobody has any desire to do it.
It seems like a great way for a global company to have a huge boost in consumer sales by a successful humanitarian run. For instance, if Kellogg’s prompted a major grain project for the entire population in Kenya, the media could ensure it would pay off for them, or not. Who knows what New York multi-billionaires care about, beyond families, but once one company saw it happening it wouldn’t matter about media backing, another would compete. Even if the motive remained -we can do it better than the other guys- at least people living under poverty would be fed.
He's right about "just the right amount of me". Population in the West is declining (China as well)."Fretting about overpopulation, is a perfect guilt-free - indeed, sanctimonious - way for "progressives" to be racists. ... way to many of them, just the right amount of me."
-- P.J. O'Rourke, All the Trouble in the World"