The Window for Avoiding a Dangerous Climate Change Has Closed

[Wyatt earp]

Oh well it's all over now.. I wonder if the AGW cult will now shut up?


Barring some incredible new carbon capture technology, the window for limiting global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius appears to have closed. That’s the stark conclusion of a report out in Nature today, which finds that the carbon reductions pledges penned into the Paris Agreement are ridiculously inadequate for keeping our climate within a safe and stable boundary.



The Paris Agreement—a historic piece of climate change policy adopted by leaders of 195 countries last December—pledged to limit human-caused global warming to less than two degrees Celsius, with a “stretch goal” of keeping our planet’s thermostat from rising more than 1.5 degrees. We’re supposed to do that by aggressively cutting back on fossil fuels and switching entirely to renewable energy sources by the end of the century.

But as climate scientists and well-informed politicians have been saying for months, global carbon emissionsare way off track if we want to meet even the 2 degree goal. Just how off track is the subject of the new analysis, led by Joeri Rogelj at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.






A Key Part of the Paris Climate Agreement Is…
Read more

In addition to concluding that “the window for limiting warming to below 1.5 degrees C with high probability and without temporarily exceeding that level already seems to have closed,” the study found that the pledges outlined in the Paris Agreement will likely see global temperatures rise 2.6 to 3.1 degrees Celsius by 2100.


https://www.google.com/amp/gizmodo....836113/amp?client=ms-android-americamovil-us#

 

[Epitah]

This is miserable.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Gee, maybe if they take a bunch more of our money and give it away, the sun will quit solar flaring......

UN Climate Summit: Causes of Climate Change “Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power”

For many years the public at large has been spoonfed the idea that Global Warming Climate Change, is caused by man’s excessive release of carbon into the atmosphere. And that the solution to the Climate crisis was to decrease the production of said gas.

Over the past several years the Global Warming fanatics have changed their tune. Many of us in the “new” media have been warning about their true motives for year.

Now, instead of the climate crisis being caused by carbon emissions, it is being caused by inequality.

On Monday, during a press conference at the United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Paris, Ms. Camille Risler, a representative of the Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD) which is an organization listed as an official consultant to the United Nations Economic and Social Council, stated that the cause of Climate Change is the unequal distribution of wealth, carbon, and power:

“This is the press conference of the Women and (unintelligible) constituency. It is one of the nine official constituencies of the UNFCCC, and we are composed of 15 women’s rights and feminist organizations from all around the world. So I’m going to begin with kind of an overview of our positions and then I will give the floor over to my colleagues that will go more into details of each section of negotiations.

I’m Camille Risler. I’m from France but I’m living in Thailand. I’m working for a feminist network that is called Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development and I’m working for the Climate Justice Program.

So what we want to highlight here is that Climate Change is a clear symptom of an unequal and unjust world.

So if we are to address the Climate crisis we need to challenge the structural causes of the crisis which lies on unequal distribution of wealth, of carbon, and of power. Whether it’s political power, economic power, or even military power.”

Ms. Risler goes on to say that the solution to the Climate crisis is to create more “just and equitable economies”.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Get it yet??? No? Here is the UN official that hands out all of America's money and why:

One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.
We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.

It is a redistribution of our money. Free yourself from the phoney belief that man can undo what the sun does.

 

[PredFan]

Good, can they shut the **** up now?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The science is setteled, we all gonna die.

.

 

[RollingThunder]

Oh well it's all over now.. I wonder if the AGW cult will now shut up?

Barring some incredible new carbon capture technology, the window for limiting global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius appears to have closed. That’s the stark conclusion of a report out in Nature today, which finds that the carbon reductions pledges penned into the Paris Agreement are ridiculously inadequate for keeping our climate within a safe and stable boundary.

The Paris Agreement—a historic piece of climate change policy adopted by leaders of 195 countries last December—pledged to limit human-caused global warming to less than two degrees Celsius, with a “stretch goal” of keeping our planet’s thermostat from rising more than 1.5 degrees. We’re supposed to do that by aggressively cutting back on fossil fuels and switching entirely to renewable energy sources by the end of the century.

But as climate scientists and well-informed politicians have been saying for months, global carbon emissionsare way off track if we want to meet even the 2 degree goal. Just how off track is the subject of the new analysis, led by Joeri Rogelj at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.


A Key Part of the Paris Climate Agreement Is…
Read more

In addition to concluding that “the window for limiting warming to below 1.5 degrees C with high probability and without temporarily exceeding that level already seems to have closed,” the study found that the pledges outlined in the Paris Agreement will likely see global temperatures rise 2.6 to 3.1 degrees Celsius by 2100.

https://www.google.com/amp/gizmodo....836113/amp?client=ms-android-americamovil-us#

Always hilarious, bareassretard, when you once again post something that you are very obviously way too stupid, ignorant and misinformed to even understand.

 

[Crick]

Oh well it's all over now.. I wonder if the AGW cult will now shut up?


Barring some incredible new carbon capture technology, the window for limiting global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius appears to have closed. That’s the stark conclusion of a report out in Nature today, which finds that the carbon reductions pledges penned into the Paris Agreement are ridiculously inadequate for keeping our climate within a safe and stable boundary.

The Paris Agreement—a historic piece of climate change policy adopted by leaders of 195 countries last December—pledged to limit human-caused global warming to less than two degrees Celsius, with a “stretch goal” of keeping our planet’s thermostat from rising more than 1.5 degrees. We’re supposed to do that by aggressively cutting back on fossil fuels and switching entirely to renewable energy sources by the end of the century.

But as climate scientists and well-informed politicians have been saying for months, global carbon emissionsare way off track if we want to meet even the 2 degree goal. Just how off track is the subject of the new analysis, led by Joeri Rogelj at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.






A Key Part of the Paris Climate Agreement Is…
Read more

In addition to concluding that “the window for limiting warming to below 1.5 degrees C with high probability and without temporarily exceeding that level already seems to have closed,” the study found that the pledges outlined in the Paris Agreement will likely see global temperatures rise 2.6 to 3.1 degrees Celsius by 2100.


https://www.google.com/amp/gizmodo....836113/amp?client=ms-android-americamovil-us#

So, have you actually got the gall to criticize the Paris Talks for not having set their goals high enough?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Still waiting for other countries to meet Kyoto goAls

 

[The Irish Ram]

Good, can they shut the **** up now?

Oh not only are they not going to shut up, they are teaching our children that it is necessary for the US to give away billions and billions or our planet will die, and they have banned any reference to the contrary. They not only want our 2nd. amendment gone, the 4th is an issue for them also. Banning the truth about fake global warming means big money.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Just in time for summer vacation.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Now we need to attempt to stop our own extinction.

 

[PredFan]

Good, can they shut the **** up now?

Oh not only are they not going to shut up, they are teaching our children that it is necessary for the US to give away billions and billions or our planet will die, and they have banned any reference to the contrary. They not only want our 2nd. amendment gone, the 4th is an issue for them also. Banning the truth about fake global warming means big money.

Of course you are right. I was just wishing.

 

[PredFan]

Now we need to attempt to stop our own extinction.

Hey, half this country lives off of the other half, Islam is going to take over the whole world, the American education system is graduating complete idiots from high schools and colleges year after year, the truth is to be shunned and outlawed, the media is 100% complicit, a criminal can become POTUS, and the disease of the morals and the mind get worse and worse.

Why bother stop our own extinction? Maybe Mother Nature wants to push the reset button.

 

[Crick]

As Mother Nature has always demonstrated, ignorance is not a survival trait.