The Washington Post Has Become Unrecognizable, The Way They Have Submitted To Trump.....I Can't Read It Anymore

[GLASNOST]

Bezos decided to glue his lips to Trump's fat ass

Bezos schmezos. Trump is saving America and (presumably) the rest of the world. Take up your Bezos paranoia with someone else.

You were typing some type of juvenile name for Harris....no doubt.

Well, I'll try again >>> Camel Hairless You see. My spell checker is programmed that way.

 

[cnm]

Trump is saving America and (presumably) the rest of the world.

It's not a cult. No way. No how.

 

[GLASNOST]

It's not a cult. No way. No how.

View attachment 1147196

It's not a cult. No way. No how.

 

[fncceo]

I Can't Read It Anymore​

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Jeff Bezos has completely destroyed a once outstanding newspaper.

The criticism of Donald Trump in the Washington Post opinion pages has become non-existent. It is absolutely chilling to behold. No more Dana Milbank. No more Eugene Robinson. No more Jennifer Rubin. No more David Ignatius. No more Ruth Marcus.

I held out hope until recently. Dana Milbank was still being very critical of Trump until a few weeks ago....and now he has been eerily silent as well.

It's ironic that the Washington Post still has the headline "Democracy Dies In Darkness" on their webpage. They have allowed democracy to die with their subjugation to Trump.

I'm cancelling my subscription.

You'll always have the daily kos and msnbc

 

[luiza]

I'm cancelling my subscription.

The fact that you ever took it seriously raises interesting views about your Gullibility and presumed lack of alternative News sources.

The only reason to ever regularly look at something like Wa Po is to check on latest CIA attempted influencing plus misinformation and disinformation routes that they are following .

 

[Lisa558]

I haven’t gone near WaPo in the last several years, after they became an obvious tool of the Left, but if what OP says is true, that means the WaPo has returned to being a regular newspaper and I think I’ll pick up a copy.

Good news. It sure seems like sanity is returning to America!

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I'm cancelling my subscription.

But you haven't cancelled your subscription to The Daily Worker, I presume?

 

[Paradoxical#1]

The fake elector scheme was illegal.....that's why Trump and all the Republicans involved were charged with crimes. Trump would have gone to jail for it if the 2024 election had not saved his ass.

As I was saying....you are too much of an unknowledgeable lightweight MAGA troll for a real discussion of these issues.

Law scholars disagree.

 

[citygator]

Jeff Bezos has completely destroyed a once outstanding newspaper.

The criticism of Donald Trump in the Washington Post opinion pages has become non-existent. It is absolutely chilling to behold. No more Dana Milbank. No more Eugene Robinson. No more Jennifer Rubin. No more David Ignatius. No more Ruth Marcus.

I held out hope until recently. Dana Milbank was still being very critical of Trump until a few weeks ago....and now he has been eerily silent as well.

It's ironic that the Washington Post still has the headline "Democracy Dies In Darkness" on their webpage. They have allowed democracy to die with their subjugation to Trump.

I'm cancelling my subscription.

I did too. Same reason. Chilling. NYTs is it from a great journal.

 

[citygator]

you have a subscription to a news paper?...you must be old....

I have an online subscription to WSJ and NYTs. Used to have wapo. No longer.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

View attachment 1147235

What a handsome and powerful president we have. Be proud.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Bezos schmezos. Trump is saving America and (presumably) the rest of the world. Take up your Bezos paranoia with someone else.

Simple thoughts for a simple MAGA mind.

Well, I'll try again >>> Camel Hairless You see. My spell checker is programmed that way.

Well....you proved me correct. Stupid ass shit that means nothing.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

You'll always have the daily kos and msnbc

You don't know that either, simpleton.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

The fact that you ever took it seriously raises interesting views about your Gullibility and presumed lack of alternative News sources.

Says the person who enthusiastically supports a deranged old man like Trump who tried to kill his own Vice President on Jan 6.

Every MAGA voter had a lobotomy a long time ago.

The only reason to ever regularly look at something like Wa Po is to check on latest CIA attempted influencing plus misinformation and disinformation routes that they are following .

More Deep State QAnon idiocy.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Law scholars disagree.

Yeah? Provide one, simp. If that were true, then Trump would not have been charged in the first place.

As I said....you don't have the intellectual guns for a serious discussion about ANYTHING.

 

[GLASNOST]

Simple thoughts for a simple MAGA mind.


Well....you proved me correct. Stupid ass shit that means nothing.

There's a huge difference between meaning nothing and understanding nothing. Of course ........ you understand nothing about it.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Yeah? Provide one, simp. If that were true, then Trump would not have been charged in the first place.

As I said....you don't have the intellectual guns for a serious discussion about ANYTHING.

Allan Dershowitz, a constitutional scholar, says so. You, not having a clue about law, think you know better than someone who spent his entire life studying it.

Edit for the real simp from Grok AI:

Alan Dershowitz has argued that Donald Trump's actions regarding the use of alternate electors in the 2020 election do not constitute a crime, primarily because such strategies have historical precedent and were not illegal in past contexts. He points to examples like Al Gore’s legal team preparing alternate electors during the 2000 Florida election challenge and the 1960 Hawaii election dispute, where alternate electors were used without legal repercussions. Dershowitz contends that these historical practices raise questions about why Trump’s similar actions in 2020, such as challenging election results and proposing alternate electors, are now being treated as criminal by prosecutors like Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Special Counsel Jack Smith. He argues that the use of alternate electors in contested elections has been a recognized legal mechanism, citing the 1876 Tilden-Hayes election as another example where competing slates of electors were submitted without criminal consequences. Dershowitz suggests that the criminalization of these actions in Trump’s case is inconsistent with historical and constitutional norms, framing it as a potential overreach by prosecutors

All this crap about him overthrowing "Democracy" is bullshit fed to you by the DNC. Get a life, dude. Or is it dudette?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Allan Dershowitz, a constitutional scholar, says so. You, not having a clue about law, think you know better than someone who spent his entire life studying it.

Edit for the real simp from Grok AI:

Alan Dershowitz has argued that Donald Trump's actions regarding the use of alternate electors in the 2020 election do not constitute a crime, primarily because such strategies have historical precedent and were not illegal in past contexts. He points to examples like Al Gore’s legal team preparing alternate electors during the 2000 Florida election challenge and the 1960 Hawaii election dispute, where alternate electors were used without legal repercussions. Dershowitz contends that these historical practices raise questions about why Trump’s similar actions in 2020, such as challenging election results and proposing alternate electors, are now being treated as criminal by prosecutors like Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Special Counsel Jack Smith. He argues that the use of alternate electors in contested elections has been a recognized legal mechanism, citing the 1876 Tilden-Hayes election as another example where competing slates of electors were submitted without criminal consequences. Dershowitz suggests that the criminalization of these actions in Trump’s case is inconsistent with historical and constitutional norms, framing it as a potential overreach by prosecutors

All this crap about him overthrowing "Democracy" is bullshit fed to you by the DNC. Get a life, dude. Or is it dudette?

Dershowitz is now a joke and everyone knows it.

Al Gore never had a plan to use fake electors. Neither did Hawaii in 1960. The alternate Hawaii electors were to be used if the courts determined that Kennedy had won Hawaii instead of Nixon. It was a fully transparent effort, unlike the theft that Trump and Eastman tried to commit.

Trump told Pence to count the fake electors on Jan 6.....which Pence refused to do. Trump broke the law because he is a total fascist who couldn't accept losing an election. PERIOD.

What Trump and Eastman did is unprecedented.

 

[GLASNOST]

Dershowitz is now a joke

Says who? You?

and everyone knows it.

Again with the "everyone knows" crap.