The video of the Trans woman boxer breaking Carini's nose is blacked out on the internet.

[WinterBorn]

None of them, right. None of the four.

Beating women is becoming an arena sport. After all. This isn't the first sport to allow abusing women.

Well she has lost 9 fights. All of them to women. They were good enough to take her out.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Well she has lost 9 fights. All of them to women. They were good enough to take her out.

They she can beat all the women they will let her.

Or she threw some fights. You know who did that? Fallon Fox, the MMA fighter that fractured a woman's eye socket with one punch. She threw some fights. Lia Thomas the 6'4" man swimming as a woman, threw some races and laughed about it. But the olympics wasn't buying his crap.

 

[WinterBorn]

They she can beat all the women they will let her.

Or she threw some fights. You know who did that? Fallon Fox, the MMA fighter that fractured a woman's eye socket with one punch. She threw some fights. Lia Thomas the 6'4" man swimming as a woman, threw some races and laughed about it. But the olympics wasn't buying his crap.

Then change the fucking rules. All this whining does nothing.

And, as I said before, you cannot change the qualification rules in the middle of the Olympic game.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Then change the fucking rules. All this whining does nothing.

And, as I said before, you cannot change the qualification rules in the middle of the Olympic game.

They didn't. Just apply the rules to guys.

 

[frigidweirdo]

"She has manly muscles! She can't be a woman!"

Define a woman? For thousands of years a woman was someone who had a vagina and menstruated.

That's what this woman is.

And women can have muscles.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You actually don't know that. You actually don't know if he has a uterus or fallopian tubes.

I know the women who she's fighting does, because she said she lost a fight to this other one before because she was menstruating.

Either way, this woman was born in very, VERY conservative Algeria, and if you have a penis, you're a boy, you have a vagina, you're a girl. And Algeria says she's female.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I know the women who she's fighting does, because she said she lost a fight to this other one before because she was menstruating.

Either way, this woman was born in very, VERY conservative Algeria, and if you have a penis, you're a boy, you have a vagina, you're a girl. And Algeria says she's female.

So does his passport. The poor guy, either male nor female but a bit of both.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So does his passport. The poor guy, either male nor female but a bit of both.

And that's the problem isn't it?

You've got these ignoramus who say "there are only two genders, male and female."

And then you ask them what the defining features are and they say "It's obvious, a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina" and you point out that this person has a vagina... and they tell you it's a man, you point out this other person has both.

Now they've decided, after thousands of years of not having DNA testing, that DNA testing is what matter, at least when it backs their own argument up.

I would start a thread about it, but I know it's pointless. They won't have a proper conversation about it.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

And that's the problem isn't it?

You've got these ignoramus who say "there are only two genders, male and female."

And then you ask them what the defining features are and they say "It's obvious, a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina" and you point out that this person has a vagina... and they tell you it's a man, you point out this other person has both.

Now they've decided, after thousands of years of not having DNA testing, that DNA testing is what matter, at least when it backs their own argument up.

I would start a thread about it, but I know it's pointless. They won't have a proper conversation about it.

The fair thing would be to have men competing against men. Women competing against women and the mutants competing against mutants.

 

[WinterBorn]

Define a woman? For thousands of years a woman was someone who had a vagina and menstruated.

That's what this woman is.

And women can have muscles.

The post you quoted had all that in quotation marks because I was mocking what is being said.

She qualified as a woman by the Olympic standards. Her passport says "Female".

 

[frigidweirdo]

The fair thing would be to have men competing against men. Women competing against women and the mutants competing against mutants.

So, you're saying there's a third gender, then?

 

[WinterBorn]

The fair thing would be to have men competing against men. Women competing against women and the mutants competing against mutants.

I'm pretty sure there are not enough "mutants".

 

[Stryder50]

Saw it in coverage on Fox news and in posts on social media.

Then please provide links to such.
I haven't time to live on the MSM all day and I have yet to see the genital proof.

If it's real,then you and/or others should be able to provide it.

Otherwise, just more smoke blowing up an arse ...

 

[Stryder50]

Surgically altered trangenders cannot reproduce.

They are mutants and essentially sexless, or non-sexual.
They should not compete against others purely of one sex or the other.

Transgender mutants~freaks belong in a category separate from the other two biologically pure sex classifications.

"Transgenders" belong in a "transgender" classification.

 

[WelfareQueen]

And that's the problem isn't it?

You've got these ignoramus who say "there are only two genders, male and female."

And then you ask them what the defining features are and they say "It's obvious, a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina" and you point out that this person has a vagina... and they tell you it's a man, you point out this other person has both.

Now they've decided, after thousands of years of not having DNA testing, that DNA testing is what matter, at least when it backs their own argument up.

I would start a thread about it, but I know it's pointless. They won't have a proper conversation about it.

This is real simple. A man is XY. A female is XX. The secondary sexual characteristics are just that....secondary.

 

[Stryder50]

My post suggest nothing of the kind.

"My type"?

The basics of what I have said in this thread is that they cannot change the rules in the middle of the games.

And I made remarks about the pervert asking if I had seen the athletes vagina.



I am all for improved testing to determine/verify gender. I have said as much. But you conveniently skipped over that part.

"My type" is the type that makes rules before a competition and doesn't change them mid-game.

"My type" is the type that wants an even playing field.



If those thing offend you.....well........tough shit.

Sorry Charlie, but I don't waste time keeping track of a member/posters past history of weeks~months~years ago they want to claim they were this or that.

My read of your recent posts (plural) were that you were defending this "he" being allowed to compete as "she" just because "he" said "he" was a "she".

I don't accept that bogus consideration and merely stated that in sex based competitions then sexual organ, hormones, and genetics, need to be openly examined and confirmed of the participants.

I'm for rules before a competition proved they are fair, unbiased, objective, non-partisan, and not "stacked" to favor a select group or range of contestants.

My take on your recent posts was that you had no objections to this "guy" being allowed to compete as a "gal" just because he said he was a she. If you claim different than provide the links to the posts that support your dodge.

I don't go for that bogus garbage and don't support any who do favor "personal testimony/affidavit" over objective, independent, 'third party' biological testing, which includes confirmation of sexual apparatus~plumbing .

Just because he said he was a she doesn't cut it with me and should be grounds for disqualification when no unbiased and pure proof otherwise has been presented to support that verbal affirmation.

 

[AlexanderPK]

I have no idea why "transfucking former men" do what they do.

But I do know that the person in question was born a biological woman. In other words, she is not a "transfucking former man".

If he's not a man and not a woman in a general sense then why don't you invent a new category, say, chicks who chose to grow a dick on their foreheads, and let them beat the living crap out of themselves? Just don't let them fuck around with normal people, for crying out loud!

 

[AlexanderPK]

This is real simple. A man is XY. A female is XX. The secondary sexual characteristics are just that....secondary.

Aha, let me just get my chromosome checker before I start applying proper pronouns to you. Oh fuck, sorry, I left it on my piano this morning. So what shall we do now that we've found ourselves in such an impasse?

 

[WinterBorn]

So, you're saying there's a third gender, then?

Sorry Charlie, but I don't waste time keeping track of a member/posters past history of weeks~months~years ago they want to claim they were this or that.

My read of your recent posts (plural) were that you were defending this "he" being allowed to compete as "she" just because "he" said "he" was a "she".

I don't accept that bogus consideration and merely stated that in sex based competitions then sexual organ, hormones, and genetics, need to be openly examined and confirmed of the participants.

I'm for rules before a competition proved they are fair, unbiased, objective, non-partisan, and not "stacked" to favor a select group or range of contestants.

My take on your recent posts was that you had no objections to this "guy" being allowed to compete as a "gal" just because he said he was a she. If you claim different than provide the links to the posts that support your dodge.

I don't go for that bogus garbage and don't support any who do favor "personal testimony/affidavit" over objective, independent, 'third party' biological testing, which includes confirmation of sexual apparatus~plumbing .

Just because he said he was a she doesn't cut it with me and should be grounds for disqualification when no unbiased and pure proof otherwise has been presented to support that verbal affirmation.

I have not supported it and do not agree with it. But the current rules are what they are.

Want to change the rules? Sounds great. But until you do, it is what it is. And you cannot change the rules in the middle of an Olympic competition. That has been my point the entire thread.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I have not supported it and do not agree with it. But the current rules are what they are.

Want to change the rules? Sounds great. But until you do, it is what it is. And you cannot change the rules in the middle of an Olympic competition. That has been my point the entire thread.

I don't mean at the Olympics, I mean in general.

The right are saying there are only two genders. Are there or aren't there?